I regret you seem to not comprehend what was written in my post. I wrote the following that you seemed to have not read.
"On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know."
That last sentence seems to be confirmed in your response. The information I posted are sourced by the following researchers. In other words, it's not my opinion. It's based on several academic studies. It's the same reason why women are targeted by advertisers. They are by far the largest TV demographic. Understanding 'why' this is reveals why women are targeted with lies by Marxist propagandists. It is mainly through women that's changing the fabric of this nation from one that is of liberty to one that is a promised 'safety'. Again, this is not my opinion, John R. Lott, Jr., Yale University Lawrence, and W. Kenny University of Florida published this study in Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?.
-- Joan Meyers-Levy , “Mixed Messages - How Men And Women Differ In Their Responses To Marketing Messages,” http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/news/capideas/sum98/meyers.htm
-- Malcolm Gladwell, “Listening to Khakis,” The New Yorker, http://www.gladwell.com/1997/1997_07_27_a_khaki.htm.
-- Ibid. “Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects.”
-- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?” Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
-- Samuel Silver, “The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!,” Jewish World Review Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761
-- Paul Recer, “New study says female brain is wired for emotion,” Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study. www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2002/07/22/female_brain/index.html
-- Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight,”
-- The word – “integrate” means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, “Females integrate, Men eliminate”). The author uses the words – “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same.
I regret you seem to not comprehend what was written in my post. I wrote the following that you seemed to have not read.
"On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know."
That last sentence seems to be confirmed in your response. The information I posted are sourced by the following researchers. In other words, it's not my opinion. It's based on several academic studies. It's the same reason why women are targeted by advertisers. They are by far the largest TV demographic.
-- Joan Meyers-Levy , “Mixed Messages - How Men And Women Differ In Their Responses To Marketing Messages,” http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/news/capideas/sum98/meyers.htm
-- Malcolm Gladwell, “Listening to Khakis,” The New Yorker, http://www.gladwell.com/1997/1997_07_27_a_khaki.htm.
-- Ibid. “Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects.”
-- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?” Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
-- Samuel Silver, “The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!,” Jewish World Review Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761
-- Paul Recer, “New study says female brain is wired for emotion,” Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study. www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2002/07/22/female_brain/index.html
-- Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight,”
-- The word – “integrate” means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, “Females integrate, Men eliminate”). The author uses the words – “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same.