Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand the scope of things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

The Constitution is an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereign Authority of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract, as are all Articles of Incorporation, between the Signers and the Authority that grants Legal Personhood (the definition of a Corporation). In the case of the Constitution, the Signers and the Authority were the same people, which is rare, but there are several other examples. The Constitutional Contract defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand the scope of things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

The Constitution is an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract, as are all Articles of Incorporation, between the Signers and the Authority that grants Legal Personhood (the definition of a Corporation). In the case of the Constitution, the Signers and the Authority were the same people, which is rare, but there are several other examples. The Constitutional Contract defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

The Constitution is an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract, as are all Articles of Incorporation, between the Signers and the Authority that grants Legal Personhood (the definition of a Corporation). In the case of the Constitution, the Signers and the Authority were the same people, which is rare, but there are several other examples. The Constitutional Contract defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract, as are all Articles of Incorporation, between the Signers and the Authority that grants Legal Personhood (the definition of a Corporation). In the case of the Constitution, the Signers and the Authority were the same people, which is rare, but there are several other examples. The Constitutional Contract defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract, as are all Articles of Incorporation, between the Signers and the Authority that grants Legal Corporeal form. In the case of the Constitution, the Signers and the Authority were the same people, which is rare, but there are several other examples. The Constitutional Contract defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract, as are all Articles of Incorporation, between the Signers and the Authority that grants Corporeal (legal) form. In the case of the Constitution, the Signers and the Authority were the same people, which is rare, but there are several other examples. The Constitutional Contract defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a specific Order to Society AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension of That Which Is).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings, and We, and all other things, are fundamentally Part of All AKA God. The idea of a separate "God" is intentional fuckery.

If you can at least grant that these things might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as a part of All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings. If you can at least grant that that might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these particular terms (God, Universe, etc.). Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the main arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as a part of All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings. If you can at least grant that that might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I'm not sure why it is important for you to define these terms. Their equality is central to my attempt to help you understand things, but it is not essential to the arguments themselves. If you can just allow that I am equating them for a reason, and try to understand that reason, it will make things go a lot smoother. Unless of course you wish to have the separate debate about the topics themselves, in which case that's fine, but is very much a tangent to the main topic of this conversation.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as a part of All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings. If you can at least grant that that might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

2/2

Billions of people throughout history have rejected that view

Billions of people throughout history have been led by the nose by an evil Cabal down a path of abject slavery. They believe what they have been taught, through fraud, for millennia. I have a feeling, based on who you are placing faith in, that you haven’t gotten far along the path of appreciating the true history of this planet. The evidence suggests we are not the first “advanced” civilization. A year ago I would have thought that was completely crazy. Then I actually started digging into the evidence. The Great Reset is not the first Reset. There have been many others, and in each case history was rewritten, and the rhetoric created in the works further obfuscated Reality.

The evidence suggests about 13,000 years ago there was a comet that hit the arctic and caused a Flood (The Flood). It almost completely wiped out the advanced civilization that existed at that time. Making that case is possible, but would take quite a while. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested, but it is well worth attempting to comprehend the scope of the rewriting of history, so you can appreciate what is going on today. That is not the only lie of history, it’s not even scratching the surface. The evidence suggests virtually everything we believe about history is a lie to one extent or another. The “official narrative” of “society started 10,000 years ago in the fertile crescent” is provably intentional fraud. The evidence for that statement is overwhelming.

Universe = the physical matter and energy we can measure that exist within reality.

I’ve tried to explain to you that your belief of this definition was implanted by a school system that purposefully intended to make you believe something that isn’t true. If you want to say “the physical part of Reality” you need to use a different word, because “Universe” means everything, by definition. It is described in the way you have defined it so that people will think of “spiritual” and “physical” as separate things. That is a fraud (intentional lie to mislead comprehension).

God = the concept of a master conductor, creator, or otherwise something that exists but is not part of the Universe itself

This “separateness” of God is another fraud. There can be no separation from God, God is That Which Is. To make this case would take a very long time, but again, it can be done, and I can lead you in the right direction if you wish. There is so very much context that needs to be understood however. There is so much fraud in our education. The Bible for example (final edit, not the original books, though some of those too), was written by the same people that wrote the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc., etc.. They are all designed to guide us in the wrong direction, by lies of context. What exactly the Right direction is I can’t say for sure of course, but all signs point to an appreciation of “oneness”, i.e. God as a part of All, i.e. The Universe, and God, and That Which Is, and Reality, are all identical meanings. If you can at least grant that that might be true, we can continue meaningfully. At least grant that your definitions might be fraudulent (intentionally misleading). You really need to delve into history more I think, because you are missing so much of the fraud.

I do not disagree with anarchocapitalist theory. I do, however, reject anarchocommunist theory.

Capitalism and Communism, or any “ism” have nothing to do with anarchy. I mean, they can have something to do with them, just like orange juice can have something to do with a peanut butter sandwich, but they have no meaningful relationship unless you purposefully have them both for lunch. They are Economic Design Patterns. We currently live in a Totalitarian Capitalism (weakly disguised as a “free market” which is a total fraud and always has been.) Capitalism is an economic design pattern to “use capital to gain more capital.” In a truly Free Market, any ism can be applied. It is when we force a society to adhere to any one ism that we create the problems. If someone wants to run a business where all workers share equally in both the means of production and the profits (an application of the Communism Design Pattern), then the market will decide whether or not they will succeed. But (presumably) all of those “workers” are there by choice in a Free Market. It is only when any ism is forced that fuckery ensues.

Economic Design Patterns have nothing intrinsically to do with “ruler” or “no ruler.”

The Constitution is a trust

It is a statement, an Article of Incorporation that, through the Sovereignty of the signers creates a Trust. It is not the Trust itself; that is the corporate entity defined by the Article. This Article of Incorporation is a Contract (as are all Articles of Incorporation), that defines a Social Order AKA a Social Contract.

2 years ago
1 score