I'm not the source of the proof, and I do not respect your intellectual honesty enough to provide you what I believe is proof. You need to stop being a baby and go find it yourself.

When you allude to any specifics (aluminum in soil) you demonstrate ignorance of the fact that the specific is a commonplace.

No, I don't. When you respond to those claims, you distort them into something that wasn't said in order to make me wrong. You are a dishonest person.

There is no "free aluminum."

You are an idiot. Aluminosilicates are how aluminum is normally found in nature. Aluminum oxide is NOT.

What aircraft sampling?

You can figure that out for yourself if you go actually look.

What you are claiming would be against air safety requirements.

And yet they managed to get it done. The explanation of how is very obvious, you'll see, if you go look for yourself instead of being a moron.

How about flight plans and aircraft tail numbers?

Good luck getting a tail number off an unmarked plane at 35,000 feet, which doesn't show up on public flight trackers.

Getting that close to another airplane is an inherently dangerous maneuver.

Why would they need to get anywhere near a plane with a contrail lingering hundreds of miles behind it?

And how would you know you are sampling a spray and not engine exhaust?

You're a moron, lol. You know that the scientific field of chemistry exists, right?

I've seen the hoax photos of a "chemtrail-equipped airliner," which was really a developmental model equipped with a water ballast management system for center-of-gravity location studies.

Irrelevant. That some people got something wrong somewhere does not affect the real proof at all.

You see, I worked in this industry. There is nothing like that going on.

You're unfortunately incorrect.

All this talk and you still haven't explained why (or if) there is a visual difference between contrails and "chemtrails."

You have not asked me to explain that, and if you had I'd tell you it's irrelevant. They can look identical, it doesn't matter. The proof has nothing to do with how they look, it is their composition.

Reference to persistence is useless, in that contrails can persist not at all or can extend from horizon to horizon for a long time, slowly diffusing.

I already said earlier that I believe that contrails CAN linger for a long time, and spread. But, the outrageous increase I saw where I live in such contrails was simply ridiculous to behold, and so clearly not natural I had no option but to reassess whether chemtrail spraying was a real thing. I looked into it, and found the proof that the various researchers had compiled was solid.

There are legitimate and open cloud-seeding programs... I assume you are not talking about this non-secret activity.

Correct, this is obviously not cloud seeding, and the planes doing it are untracked (which is illegal for civilian planes).

There are also emergency situations where civil or military aircraft must dump fuel for safety purposes prior to an emergency landing... And, of course, there is extinguishant dumping in the fighting of forest fires.

So, you're saying they filled the entire sky from horizon to horizon, almost every day for three months, with emergency fuel dumps? So like, several thousand emergency landings happening over my head? Oh, but some of it may be forest fires being put out, all zero of them this season. So, we've got hundreds and hundreds of phantom emergency landings and phantom forest fires being put out. That explains it!

you are not talking about the visibly evident and copious chemtrails inherent in launch vehicles using large solid boosters.

Oh, well now THAT explains it, these conventional winged aircraft we see in the sky leaving dozens of lingering contrails that blanket the entire sky every day are actually solid booster space launch vehicles! In disguise! It all makes sense now.

Could it be that such a cause would not further your paranoid fantasy? But why not?

Oh yes, a few rocket launches here and there are totally the cause of total sky enveloping contrails across basically the entire nation, totally the cause of increased aluminum in the air, rain, and soil. Not the dozens of unmarked, untracked aircraft we can see with our own eyes literally spraying stuff into the air every day.

I hope you realize how dumb you sound, but I suspect you won't.

I'm not the source of the proof, and I do not respect your intellectual honesty enough to provide you what I believe is proof. You need to stop being a baby and go find it yourself.

When you allude to any specifics (aluminum in soil) you demonstrate ignorance of the fact that the specific is a commonplace.

No, I don't. When you respond to those claims, you distort them into something that wasn't said in order to make me wrong. You are a dishonest person.

There is no "free aluminum."

You are an idiot. Aluminosilicates are how aluminum is normally found in nature. Aluminum oxide is NOT.

What aircraft sampling?

You can figure that out for yourself if you go actually look.

What you are claiming would be against air safety requirements.

And yet they managed to get it done. The explanation of how is very obvious, you'll see, if you go look for yourself instead of being a moron.

How about flight plans and aircraft tail numbers?

Good luck getting a tail number off an unmarked plane at 35,000 feet, which doesn't show up on public flight trackers.

Getting that close to another airplane is an inherently dangerous maneuver.

Why would they need to get anywhere near a plane with a contrail lingering hundreds of miles behind it?

And how would you know you are sampling a spray and not engine exhaust?

You're a moron, lol. You know that the scientific field of chemistry exists, right?

I've seen the hoax photos of a "chemtrail-equipped airliner," which was really a developmental model equipped with a water ballast management system for center-of-gravity location studies.

Irrelevant. That some people got something wrong somewhere does not affect the real proof at all.

You see, I worked in this industry. There is nothing like that going on.

You're unfortunately incorrect.

All this talk and you still haven't explained why (or if) there is a visual difference between contrails and "chemtrails."

You have no asked me to explain that, and if you had I'd tell you it's irrelevant. They can look identical, it doesn't matter. The proof has nothing to do with how they look, it is their composition.

Reference to persistence is useless, in that contrails can persist not at all or can extend from horizon to horizon for a long time, slowly diffusing.

I already said earlier that I believe that contrails CAN linger for a long time, and spread. But, the outrageous increase I saw where I live in such contrails was simply ridiculous to behold, and so clearly not natural I had no option but to reassess whether chemtrail spraying was a real thing. I looked into it, and found the proof that the various researchers had compiled was solid.

There are legitimate and open cloud-seeding programs... I assume you are not talking about this non-secret activity.

Correct, this is obviously not cloud seeding, and the planes doing it are untracked (which is illegal for civilian planes).

There are also emergency situations where civil or military aircraft must dump fuel for safety purposes prior to an emergency landing... And, of course, there is extinguishant dumping in the fighting of forest fires.

So, you're saying they filled the entire sky from horizon to horizon, almost every day for three months, with emergency fuel dumps? So like, several thousand emergency landings happening over my head? Oh, but some of it may be forest fires being put out, all zero of them this season. So, we've got hundreds and hundreds of phantom emergency landings and phantom forest fires being put out. That explains it!

you are not talking about the visibly evident and copious chemtrails inherent in launch vehicles using large solid boosters.

Oh, well now THAT explains it, these conventional winged aircraft we see in the sky leaving dozens of lingering contrails that blanket the entire sky every day are actually solid booster space launch vehicles! In disguise! It all makes sense now.

Could it be that such a cause would not further your paranoid fantasy? But why not?

Oh yes, a few rocket launches here and there are totally the cause of total sky enveloping contrails across basically the entire nation, totally the cause of increased aluminum in the air, rain, and soil. Not the dozens of unmarked, untracked aircraft we can see with our own eyes literally spraying stuff into the air every day.

I hope you realize how dumb you sound, but I suspect you won't.