Why do you keep bringing him up? What does he have to do with the claim of "cast iron coverage?"

Look at the post title and figure it out.

Why do you continue to avoid answering what data is being collected as part of the "cast iron coverage" claimed? How can one make the claim the coverage was "cast iron" without even knowing what was collected?

The only "claim" of cast iron coverage was in regards to the capabilities of the surveillance balloons to communicate any data collected with each other and command centers on the ground. If you purchase 6-7 balloons from that company, you can cover the entire continental United States as well as northern Mexico and southern Canada. The balloons have the ability to communicate through multiple means, including satellite, and are operating at 60,000 feet, which means their communication can't be scrambled by traditional anti-aircraft defenses, REGARDLESS OF WHAT DATA THEY ARE BEING USED TO COLLECT.

And I'm not avoiding your what data is being collected question. The answer is WE DON'T KNOW since you apparently don't understand WE HAVE NO IDEA.

You're wasting my time. The only curious thing is why I even bother responding to you at this point.

Why do you keep bringing him up? What does he have to do with the claim of "cast iron coverage?"

Look at the post title and figure it out.

Why do you continue to avoid answering what data is being collected as part of the "cast iron coverage" claimed? How can one make the claim the coverage was "cast iron" without even knowing what was collected?

The only "claim" of cast iron coverage was in regards to the capabilities of the surveillance balloons to communicate any data collected with each other and command centers on the ground. If you purchase 6-7 balloons from that company, you can cover the entire continental United States as well as northern Mexico and southern Canada. The balloons have the ability to communicate through multiple means, including satellite, and are operating at 60,000 feet, which means their communication can't be scrambled by traditional anti-aircraft defenses, REGARDLESS OF WHAT DATA THEY ARE BEING USED TO COLLECT.

And I'm not avoiding your what data is being collected question. The answer is WE DON'T KNOW.

You're wasting my time. The only curious thing is why I even bother responding to you at this point.

Why do you keep bringing him up? What does he have to do with the claim of "cast iron coverage?"

Look at the post title and figure it out.

Why do you continue to avoid answering what data is being collected as part of the "cast iron coverage" claimed? How can one make the claim the coverage was "cast iron" without even knowing what was collected?

The only "claim" of cast iron coverage was in regards to the capabilities of the surveillance balloons to communicate any data collected with each other and command centers on the ground. If you purchase 6-7 balloons from that company, you can cover the entire continental United States as well as northern Mexico and southern Canada. The balloons have the ability to communicate through multiple means, including satellite, and are operating at 60,000 feet, which means their communication can't be scrambled by traditional anti-aircraft defenses, REGARDLESS OF WHAT DATA THEY ARE BEING USED TO COLLECT.

And I'm not avoiding your what data is being collected question. The answer is WE DON'T KNOW.

You're wasting my time.

Why do you keep bringing him up? What does he have to do with the claim of "cast iron coverage?"

Look at the post title and figure it out.

Why do you continue to avoid answering what data is being collected as part of the "cast iron coverage" claimed? How can one make the claim the coverage was "cast iron" without even knowing what was collected?

The only "claim" of cast iron coverage was in regards to the capabilities of the surveillance balloons to communicate with each other and command centers on the ground. If you purchase 6-7 balloons from that company, you can cover the entire continental United States as well as northern Mexico and southern Canada. The balloons have the ability to communicate through multiple means and are operating at 60,000 feet, REGARDLESS OF WHAT DATA THEY ARE BEING USED TO COLLECT.

And I'm not avoiding your what data is being collected question. The answer is WE DON'T KNOW.

You're wasting my time.

Why do you keep bringing him up? What does he have to do with the claim of "cast iron coverage?"

Look at the post title and figure it out.

Why do you continue to avoid answering what data is being collected as part of the "cast iron coverage" claimed? How can one make the claim the coverage was "cast iron" without even knowing what was collected?

The only "claim" of cast iron coverage was in regards to the capabilities of the surveillance balloons to communicate with each other and command centers on the ground. If you purchase 6-7 balloons from that company, you can cover the entire continental United States as well as northern Mexico and southern Canada. The balloons have the ability to communicate through multiple means and are operating at 60,000 feet, REGARDLESS OF WHAT DATA THEY ARE BEING USED TO COLLECT.

And I'm not avoiding your what data is being collected question. The answer is WE DON'T KNOW.

You're wasting my time.