It does not prove or disprove.

I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

1. If you were Dave of X22, would you rather have the country fixed up overnight or would you rather the current situation gets prolonged? Selling hopium is good business I heard.
2. If you were Patel Patriot, you see donations keep coming in for the series, would you rather be proven right immediately or just point out enough ambiguous clues to keep the readers engaged and donations coming?
3. If you were General Flynn, would you rather have Trump reinstated as president or have the current situation keep going and charge hefty speaking fees? (And the prospect of a presidential run in 2024.)

I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot of respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.

Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.

Edit: Judging by the responses, it is clear that many got the impression that I had concluded that Dave, Patel Patriot and General Flynn have sinister motivations. That's not true, I merely posed hard questions, to which I have no definitive answers, that's why I said it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing things.

Attacking someone for asking uncomfortable questions that challenge your own interpretations of things by immediately calling them doomers or shills is no different than the left's name calling.

Humans are complex creatures, on any given issue, we fall into a spectrum of opinions in a Bell curve distribution pattern. You can't expect everyone to see things the way you do, and if the right-leaning platforms start banning people for saying things that don't exactly match their stance, then they are also no better than Twitter or Facebook. We don't want this to become an echo chamber. Just my opinion here.

It does not prove or disprove.

I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

1. If you were Dave of X22, would you rather have the country fixed up overnight or would you rather the current situation gets prolonged? Selling hopium is good business I heard.
2. If you were Patel Patriot, you see donations keep coming in for the series, would you rather be proven right immediately or just point out enough ambiguous clues to keep the readers engaged and donations coming?
3. If you were General Flynn, would you rather have Trump reinstated as president or have the current situation keep going and charge hefty speaking fees? (And the prospect of a presidential run in 2024.)

I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot of respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.

Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.

It does not prove or disprove.

I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

1. If you were Dave of X22, would you rather have the country fixed up overnight or would you rather the current situation gets prolonged? Selling hopium is good business I heard.
2. If you were Patel Patriot, you see donations keep coming in for the series, would you rather be proven right immediately or just point out enough ambiguous clues to keep the readers engaged and donations coming?
3. If you were General Flynn, would you rather have Trump reinstated as president or have the current situation keep going and charge hefty speaking fees? (And the prospect of a presidential run in 2024.)

I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot if respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.

Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.

It does not prove or disprove.

I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

1. If you were Dave of X22, would you rather have the country fixed up overnight or would you rather the current situation gets prolonged? Selling opium is good business I heard.
2. If you were Patel Patriot, you see donations keep coming in for the series, would you rather be proven right immediately or just point out enough ambiguous clues to keep the readers engaged and donations coming?
3. If you were General Flynn, would you rather have Trump reinstated as president or have the current situation keep going and charge hefty speaking fees? (And the prospect of a presidential run in 2024.)

I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot if respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.

Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.