Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The world has a tragic history of bloodshed and genocide. In the past century there have been the following cases of Genocide:

China 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50 49-78,000,000 purges

USSR 1932-39 23,000,000 the purges plus Ukraine's famine

Germany 1939-1945 12,000,000 concentration camps and civilians WWII

Congo 1886-1908 8,000,000 imperialism

Japan 1941-44 5,000,000 civilians in WWII

Turkey 1915-20 2,500,000 Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians

Cambodia 1975-79 1,700,000 purges and concentration camps

North Korea 1948-94 1,600,000 purges and concentration camps

Ethiopia 1975-78 1,500,000 purges

Biafra 1967-1970 1,000,000 ethnic cleansing

Afghanistan1979-1982 900,000 purges and rebellion

How many of these Genocides were you aware of? It seems that the only Genocide that is remembered at all is the Jewish Genocide of Germany. Whether you believe with the initial Red Cross reports that 350,00 Jews were killed by Nazis or believe historians today that 6 million were killed, it was certainly an atrocity!

Nonetheless, it seems that every reference to evil government tyranny, brainwashed civilians, or helpless victims, it is always the WWII Holocaust that is remembered.

I have noted that virtually every list of "greatest genocides" all have the German holocaust listed as number one, even if there are others that greatly surpass the numbers of victims.

Even in forums of free thinkers, the WWII holocaust is the archetype of all genocides.

Perhaps in honor of other world victims, and in the sake of diversity we could alter our speech a little.

Instead of saying "A lawbreaker was hiding Jews from Nazis in Germany" we could say "A lawbreaker was hiding Christians from Bolsheviks in Russia".

Instead of saying "This is how the Germans began to treat the Jews" we could say "This is how the Turks began treating the Armenian Christians."

Instead of saying "The hatred against the Jews was fueled by Nazi propaganda and media" we could say "The hatred against the Tutsi's was fueled by Hutu propaganda and media"

Am I out of line here?

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

The world has a tragic history of bloodshed and genocide. In the past century there have been the following cases of Genocide:

China 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50 49-78,000,000 purges

USSR 1932-39 23,000,000 the purges plus Ukraine's famine

Germany 1939-1945 12,000,000 concentration camps and civilians WWII

Congo 1886-1908 8,000,000 imperialism

Japan 1941-44 5,000,000 civilians in WWII

Turkey 1915-20 2,500,000 Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians

Cambodia 1975-79 1,700,000 purges and concentration camps

North Korea 1948-94 1,600,000 purges and concentration camps

Ethiopia 1975-78 1,500,000 purges

Biafra1967-1970 1,000,000 ethnic cleansing

Afghanistan1979-1982 900,000purges and rebellion

How many of these Genocides were you aware of? It seems that the only Genocide that is remembered at all is the Jewish Genocide of Germany. Whether you believe with the initial Red Cross reports that 350,00 Jews were killed by Nazis or believe historians today that 6 million were killed, it was certainly an atrocity!

Nonetheless, it seems that every reference to evil government tyranny, brainwashed civilians, or helpless victims, it is always the WWII Holocaust that is remembered.

I have noted that virtually every list of "greatest genocides" all have the German holocaust listed as number one, even if there are others that greatly surpass the numbers of victims.

Even in forums of free thinkers, the WWII holocaust is the archetype of all genocides.

Perhaps in honor of other world victims, and in the sake of diversity we could alter our speech a little.

Instead of saying "A lawbreaker was hiding Jews from Nazis in Germany" we could say "A lawbreaker was hiding Christians from Bolsheviks in Russia".

Instead of saying "This is how the Germans began to treat the Jews" we could say "This is how the Turks began treating the Armenian Christians."

Instead of saying "The hatred against the Jews was fueled by Nazi propaganda and media" we could say "The hatred against the Tutsi's was fueled by Hutu propaganda and media"

Am I out of line here?

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

The world has a tragic history of bloodshed and genocide. In the past century there have been the following cases of Genocide:

China1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-5049-78,000,000 purges

USSR1932-39 23,000,000 the purges plus Ukraine's famine

Germany1939-1945 12,000,000 concentration camps and civilians WWII

Congo1886-1908 8,000,000 imperialism

Japan1941-44 5,000,000 civilians in WWII

Turkey1915-20 2,500,000 Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians

Cambodia1975-79 1,700,000purges and concentration camps

North Korea1948-94 1,600,000purges and concentration camps

Ethiopia1975-78 1,500,000purges

Biafra1967-1970 1,000,000ethnic cleansing

Afghanistan1979-1982 900,000purges and rebellion

How many of these Genocides were you aware of? It seems that the only Genocide that is remembered at all is the Jewish Genocide of Germany. Whether you believe with the initial Red Cross reports that 350,00 Jews were killed by Nazis or believe historians today that 6 million were killed, it was certainly an atrocity!

Nonetheless, it seems that every reference to evil government tyranny, brainwashed civilians, or helpless victims, it is always the WWII Holocaust that is remembered.

I have noted that virtually every list of "greatest genocides" all have the German holocaust listed as number one, even if there are others that greatly surpass the numbers of victims.

Even in forums of free thinkers, the WWII holocaust is the archetype of all genocides.

Perhaps in honor of other world victims, and in the sake of diversity we could alter our speech a little.

Instead of saying "A lawbreaker was hiding Jews from Nazis in Germany" we could say "A lawbreaker was hiding Christians from Bolsheviks in Russia".

Instead of saying "This is how the Germans began to treat the Jews" we could say "This is how the Turks began treating the Armenian Christians."

Instead of saying "The hatred against the Jews was fueled by Nazi propaganda and media" we could say "The hatred against the Tutsi's was fueled by Hutu propaganda and media"

Am I out of line here?

2 years ago
1 score