Well, well well ... "workplace safety," huh?
Since there is no study (and the CDC/FDA admits there is no study) that shows that taking an EXPERIMENTAL jab will prevent the transmission of ANY illness ... there is NO PROOF that taking that jab will do anything with regard to workplace safety.
It is, therefore, fraud, and unenforceable.
Sucks to have to go to court, but hey.
Would be interesting to file for a Writ of Quo Warranto in the local court against the city of Pittsburgh. This would require the city to prove they have lawful authority to exist at all, and the charge would be they are required under law to protect the rights of the People for whom they work, and here they claim they have authority to violate someone's rights in the fraudulent claim that they will protect others.
If they are refusing to uphold their purpose for existing, then the city charter should be dissolved.
Also, if city employees are claiming to be operating in the capacity of city employees with power to operate a city, per its charter, are de facto operating only under color of law, then they should be held personally accountable in their own names for any damages they cause under said color of law.
Of course, if they have a bond on file, then the bond assurance company would pay the damages. But if they don't, then sucks to be them. It comes out of their own bank accounts, retirement accounts, and home equity.
That's what a Writ of Quo Warranto could potentially accomplish.
Any lawyers have the balls to file it?
Well, well well ... "workplace safety," huh?
Since there is no study (and the CDC/FDA admits there is no study) that shows that taking an EXPERIMENTAL jab will prevent the transmission of ANY illness ... there is NO PROOF that taking that jab will do anything with regard to workplace safety.
It is, therefore, fraud, and unenforceable.
Sucks to have to go to court, but hey.
Would be interesting to file for a Writ of Quo Warranto in the local court against the city of Pittsburgh. This would require the city to prove they have lawful authority to exist at all, and the charge would be they are required under law to protect the rights of the People for whom they work, and here they claim they have authority to violate someone's rights in the fraudulent claim that they will protect others.
If they are refusing to uphold their purpose for existing, then the city charter should be dissolved.
That's what a Writ of Quo Warranto could potentially accomplish.
Any lawyers have the balls to file it?