Odd how this evidence is substantially missing from this conversation.

The evidence is missing from this conversation because that is not what this conversation is about. This conversation is about censorship of evidence! What the fuck dude?

injection hardware, installed en masse, in commercial aircraft

Wait, I need to show you the evidence you insist on for people to be able to show evidence at all? This "I know what is true better than anyone" logic here is insane. It's not about me. It's not about you. It's not about chemtrails. It's about evidence and debate.

The path to the Truth is not based on your beliefs, or my beliefs, or anyone's beliefs, it is based on debating the evidence.

The only way to debate the evidence is to see the evidence and then debate it.

Now I understand why this board is so censored.

While I have other evidence, I don't have any of the evidence you want to see. I woudln't even look for such evidence because none of that would be even slightly convincing for me. I look for other evidence; chemical evidence, atmospheric evidence.

I am a scientist. My investigations into chemtrails are science based. I don't care about trying to figure out how they get it up there. I care about whether or not there is evidence in the atmosphere, in the ground, in the groundwater, in the plants, in our bodies, etc.

This video is not the best exposition because it's not a long list of peer reviewed papers (which I doubt you would want to wade through), but it gives a good amount of detail in some of the specifics, and is the best exposition I've found all in one place.

The exposition on aluminum salts is particularly interesting (starts around 12-13 mins).

Maybe if it wasn't all censored, I'd have a lot more "non-science" stuff to show you, though probably not, because I don't generally consider that to be good evidence and probably wouldn't save it unless it was really good.

Because chemtrails are a chemical fuckery, I prefer chemical evidence.

Odd how this evidence is substantially missing from this conversation.

The evidence is missing from this conversation because that is not what this conversation is about. This conversation is about censorship of evidence! What the fuck dude?

injection hardware, installed en masse, in commercial aircraft

Wait, I need to show you the evidence you insist on for people to be able to show evidence at all? This "I know what is true better than anyone" logic here is insane. It's not about me. It's not about you. It's not about chemtrails. It's about evidence and debate.

The path to the Truth is not based on your beliefs, or my beliefs, or anyone's beliefs, it is based on debating the evidence.

The only way to debate the evidence is to see the evidence and then debate it.

Now I understand why this board is so censored.

While I have other evidence, I don't have any of the evidence you want to see. I woudln't even look for such evidence because none of that would be even slightly convincing for me. I look for other evidence; chemical evidence, atmospheric evidence.

I am a scientist. My investigations into chemtrails are science based. I don't care about trying to figure out how they get it up there. I care about whether or not there is evidence in the atmosphere, in the ground, in the groundwater, in the plants, in our bodies, etc.

This video is not the best exposition because it's not a long list of peer reviewed papers (which I doubt you would appreciate), but it gives a good amount of detail in some of the specifics, and is the best exposition I've found all in one place.

The exposition on aluminum salts is particularly interesting (starts around 12-13 mins).

Maybe if it wasn't all censored, I'd have a lot more "non-science" stuff to show you, though probably not, because I don't generally consider that to be good evidence and probably wouldn't save it unless it was really good.

Because chemtrails are a chemical fuckery, I prefer chemical evidence.

Odd how this evidence is substantially missing from this conversation.

The evidence is missing from this conversation because that is not what this conversation is about. This conversation is about censorship of evidence! What the fuck dude?

injection hardware, installed en masse, in commercial aircraft

Wait, I need to show you the evidence you insist on for people to be able to show evidence at all? This "I know what is true better than anyone" logic here is insane. It's not about me. It's not about you. It's not about chemtrails. It's about evidence and debate.

The path to the Truth is not based on your beliefs, or my beliefs, or anyone's beliefs, it is based on debating the evidence.

The only way to debate the evidence is to see the evidence and then debate it.

Now I understand why this board is so censored.

While I have other evidence, I don't have any of the evidence you want to see. I woudln't even look for such evidence because none of that would be even slightly convincing for me. I have other evidence; chemical evidence, atmospheric evidence.

I am a scientist. My investigations into chemtrails are science based. I don't care about trying to figure out how they get it up there. I care about whether or not there is evidence in the atmosphere, in the ground, in the groundwater, in the plants, in our bodies, etc.

This video is not the best exposition because it's not a long list of peer reviewed papers (which I doubt you would appreciate), but it gives a good amount of detail in some of the specifics, and is the best exposition I've found all in one place.

The exposition on aluminum salts is particularly interesting (starts around 12-13 mins).

Maybe if it wasn't all censored, I'd have a lot more "non-science" stuff to show you, though probably not, because I don't generally consider that to be good evidence and probably wouldn't save it unless it was really good.

Because chemtrails are a chemical fuckery, I prefer chemical evidence.