Wrong, REPORTED current short of 19%. Learn about total return swaps
That is a claim made by the touts.
PROVE it.
Wrong. Read early 2021 SEC report. Shorts covered not closed. There was no squeeze, was only retail buying pressure.
YOU read it, and then quote me line and verse where it specifically says that. Good luck.
Melvin shut down last month. Again learn about total return swaps.
If I remember correctly, they shut down due to poor overall performance in a bear market environment, but NOT a blow up of the fund. So, it is NOT evidence for your position.
You sound like Jim Cramer.
LOL. There are TWO ways to know that I am not Jim Cramer:
(1) I predicted that a stock (any stock -- in this case, GME) would go DOWN in price, not up, and did so during a bull market, and
(2) I was right.
They are investing tons of money into the company.
That has NOTHING to do with the FACT that they are losing money, which is my point that you quoted and (tried to) respond to.
Do you not know the difference between (a) profit and loss, and (b) sources and uses of cash flow?
Have you read the Cash Flow Statements? Do you know what they are? Nope and nope.
ZERO DEBT AND STILL OVER 1 BILLION CASH ON HAND
I already addressed that: They do NOT have zero debt, and they DO have over $1 billion cash ($1.2 billion), and that is BECAUSE they diluted the stock to do it -- right AFTER the big short squeeze, which I PREDICTED A YEAR AGO they would do (right here on GAW).
So, stop shoveling the bullshit. It's getting a little deep and I don't have my wading boots with me.
KEK
Wrong. At this rate it would take many years for that to happen.
Tell me: What is the current burn rate? I doubt you know what that is, but hey ... it's the internet and you can look it up.
READ EARNINGS REPORTS
Funny how I am the one who DID refer to earnings reports in this thread, even though I have NO INTEREST in the stock, while YOU have NOT ONCE in this thread referred to anything in the earnings reports until I brought it up.
We both know why that is.
THERE WAS NO SHORT SQUEEZE, READ SEC REPORT
Again, show me where in the SEC report it says that.
That is simply your opinion with zero facts.
Finally, we agree! That statement was my opinion -- which I concluded based on facts.
Your opinion seems to be based on what bullshitters have fed you, and you have not done YOUR OWN due dilligence.
I do NOT own (or short) GME ... BECAUSE I did my research. And I have been right over this past year about both the stock price going down AND that GME would issue more stock.
You, OTOH, have been wrong. What is your excuse?
Wrong, REPORTED current short of 19%. Learn about total return swaps
That is a claim made by the touts.
PROVE it.
Wrong. Read early 2021 SEC report. Shorts covered not closed. There was no squeeze, was only retail buying pressure.
YOU read it, and then quote me line and verse where it specifically says that. Good luck.
Melvin shut down last month. Again learn about total return swaps.
If I remember correctly, they shut down due to poor overall performance in a bear market environment, but NOT a blow up of the fund. So, it is NOT evidence for your position.
You sound like Jim Cramer.
LOL. There are TWO ways to know that I am not Jim Cramer:
(1) I predicted that a stock (any stock -- in this case, GME) would go DOWN in price, not up, and did so during a bull market, and
(2) I was right.
They are investing tons of money into the company.
That has NOTHING to do with the FACT that they are losing money, which is my point that you quoted and (tried to) respond to.
Do you not know the difference between (a) profit and loss, and (b) sources and uses of cash flow?
Have you read the Cash Flow Statements? Do you know what they are? Nope and nope.
ZERO DEBT AND STILL OVER 1 BILLION CASH ON HAND
I already addressed that: They do NOT have zero debt, and they DO have over $1 billion cash ($1.2 billion), and that is BECAUSE they diluted the stock to do it -- right AFTER the big short squeeze, which I PREDICTED A YEAR AGO they would do (right here on GAW).
So, stop shoveling the bullshit. It's getting a little deep and I don't have my wading boots with me.
KEK
Wrong. At this rate it would take many years for that to happen.
Tell me: What is the current burn rate? I doubt you know what that is, but hey ... it's the internet and you can look it up.
READ EARNINGS REPORTS
Funny how I am the one to DID refer to earnings reports in this thread, even though I have NO INTEREST in the stock, while YOU have NOT ONCE in this thread referred to anything in the earnings reports until I brought it up.
We both know why that is.
THERE WAS NO SHORT SQUEEZE, READ SEC REPORT
Again, show me where in the SEC report it says that.
That is simply your opinion with zero facts.
Finally, we agree! That statement was my opinion -- which I concluded based on facts.
Your opinion seems to be based on what bullshitters have fed you, and you have not done YOUR OWN due dilligence.
I do NOT own (or short) GME ... BECAUSE I did my research. And I have been right over this past year about both the stock price going down AND that GME would issue more stock.
You, OTOH, have been wrong. What is your excuse?