No. 8chan predated the Reddit ban on Q stuff by several years.
You're assuming that military intelligence is so dumb they wouldn't have predicted the heavy-handed censorship, or a plan that was fallible if cabal-owned media predictably wouldn't cooperate.
I have never heard a reasonable explanation for why a team of digital supersoldier shad to rely on Jim Watkins and a fairly basic chan site for “plausible deniability.” Really?
There are two questions wound up in that statement, why the need for plausible deniability and why Jim Watkins.
What is the opposite of plausible deniability? Full disclosure? Imagine that, in WW2, the allies not only didn't secure their communications, but instead broadcast their every move to the enemy and what a disaster it would have been.
Regarding on Jim Watkins, Q doesn't "rely on him". Not at all. Military intelligence have devised a way to send us messages that are confirmed based on proofs provided. It's a robust system that can withstand bad actors inserting themselves in channels of communication.
Wouldn't it be silly to think that the plan to save the world would boil down to the performance of one individual? Q could reconfirm themselves anywhere on any platform they desire with a couple deltas or other significant proof.
Also, down to the minute? Minute of what? McCain’s death? The announcement of McCain’s death? In what time zone? Through what media?
Q drop 1706
Jul 25, 2018 7:28:35 PM EDT
https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1033509124619681792
“Senator John Sidney McCain III died at 4:28pm on August 25, 2018. With the Senator when he passed were his wife Cindy and their family. At his death, he had served the United States of America faithfully for sixty years.”
Account for time zone. Exactly, to the minute.
Would you mind telling me which photo specifically is the most proof-worthy? Many of them are Bigfoot-level blurry or of generic clouds.
Take for instance the generic clouds post you're talking about.
The proof isn't designed to prove that Q was real, or even that they were actually taken over North Korea.
The proof is that the photos are, in fact, sequential and taken from the same camera, by the same person, in the same plane.
That's all that proof was designed for. To confirm the continuity of Q through a trip code change, and that the old poster is the same as the new poster.
Did you check? Or are you only looking for the confirmation in Q posts? Why aren’t you looking for deltas in HRC’s posts? Why not in Jim Gaffigan’s?
If HRC had predicted McCain would be in the news, and one month later he was pronounced dead, to the minute, you wouldn't consider him the latest Arkancide victim?
If they have deltas, that would therefore mean they’re also part of the Plan. But people are only looking at Q.
Other people haven't made the claim to be a backchannel for military intelligence.
I get your point, that Q is using methods of what fortune-tellers do, predicting vague things in a way they are certain to be confirmed, if enough predictions are made.
But there are too many coincidences that are too exact.
To be honest, I'm surprised you asked me about the "to the minute" with McCain. It sounded like you had never heard that before. If you haven't looked into that particular proof, it makes me wonder how many others you haven't fully checked out (being one of the most famous).
And I’m supposed to be mystified that the most famous Republican at the time besides trump was predicted to be “in the news soon”?
And do you still feel that way when you realize the time on the death certificate to the time of Q's posts are exactly one month, to the minute?
What fascinates me most is your complete certainty. I'm an odds kind-of-guy. Everything has varying levels of certainty. Like I don't think Q has came back, but I allow for the possibility they might be with further verification.
I might put that opinion at 75% certainty that the new Q isn't real, or rather uncertainty. Some things are unknowable.
I put Q's existence, as stated by Q, at 100% certainty of being "real", 95% of being a benevolent psyop, 90% that it's military intelligence operating as they state themselves to be.
But that remaining uncertainty has me prepping to take care of my family just in case military intelligence doesn't send the bad guys to Gitmo.
You being 100% certain that the Q and McCain are merely a coincidence, or 100% ruling out that Q is real ... doesn't appeal to me as being very wise based on what I've seen. There are too many coincidences.
Another random coincidence off the top of my head, there being a Q stocking in a whitehouse photo.
You can argue that Q may or may not be military intelligence. You cannot argue that Q coordinates with Trump and the whitehouse. There's no disputing that, only the implications of what Trump and Q coordinating means.
No. 8chan predated the Reddit ban on Q stuff by several years.
You're assuming that military intelligence is so dumb they wouldn't have predicted the heavy-handed censorship.
I have never heard a reasonable explanation for why a team of digital supersoldier shad to rely on Jim Watkins and a fairly basic chan site for “plausible deniability.” Really?
There are two questions wound up in that statement, why the need for plausible deniability and why Jim Watkins.
What is the opposite of plausible deniability? Full disclosure? Imagine that, in WW2, the allies not only didn't secure their communications, but instead broadcast their every move to the enemy and what a disaster it would have been.
Regarding on Jim Watkins, Q doesn't "rely on him". Not at all. Military intelligence have devised a way to send us messages that are confirmed based on proofs provided. It's a robust system that can withstand bad actors inserting themselves in channels of communication.
Wouldn't it be silly to think that the plan to save the world would boil down to the performance of one individual? Q could reconfirm themselves anywhere on any platform they desire with a couple deltas or other significant proof.
Also, down to the minute? Minute of what? McCain’s death? The announcement of McCain’s death? In what time zone? Through what media?
Q drop 1706
Jul 25, 2018 7:28:35 PM EDT
https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1033509124619681792
“Senator John Sidney McCain III died at 4:28pm on August 25, 2018. With the Senator when he passed were his wife Cindy and their family. At his death, he had served the United States of America faithfully for sixty years.”
Account for time zone. Exactly, to the minute.
Would you mind telling me which photo specifically is the most proof-worthy? Many of them are Bigfoot-level blurry or of generic clouds.
Take for instance the generic clouds post you're talking about.
The proof isn't designed to prove that Q was real, or even that they were actually taken over North Korea.
The proof is that the photos are, in fact, sequential and taken from the same camera, by the same person, in the same plane.
That's all that proof was designed for. To confirm the continuity of Q through a trip code change, and that the old poster is the same as the new poster.
Did you check? Or are you only looking for the confirmation in Q posts? Why aren’t you looking for deltas in HRC’s posts? Why not in Jim Gaffigan’s?
If HRC had predicted McCain would be in the news, and one month later he was pronounced dead, to the minute, you wouldn't consider him the latest Arkancide victim?
If they have deltas, that would therefore mean they’re also part of the Plan. But people are only looking at Q.
Other people haven't made the claim to be a backchannel for military intelligence.
I get your point, that Q is using methods of what fortune-tellers do, predicting vague things in a way they are certain to be confirmed, if enough predictions are made.
But there are too many coincidences that are too exact.
To be honest, I'm surprised you asked me about the "to the minute" with McCain. It sounded like you had never heard that before. If you haven't looked into that particular proof, it makes me wonder how many others you haven't fully checked out (being one of the most famous).
And I’m supposed to be mystified that the most famous Republican at the time besides trump was predicted to be “in the news soon”?
And do you still feel that way when you realize the time on the death certificate to the time of Q's posts are exactly one month, to the minute?
What fascinates me most is your complete certainty. I'm an odds kind-of-guy. Everything has varying levels of certainty. Like I don't think Q has came back, but I allow for the possibility they might be with further verification.
I might put that opinion at 75% certainty that the new Q isn't real, or rather uncertainty. Some things are unknowable.
I put Q's existence, as stated by Q, at 100% certainty of being "real", 95% of being a benevolent psyop, 90% that it's military intelligence operating as they state themselves to be.
But that remaining uncertainty has me prepping to take care of my family just in case military intelligence doesn't send the bad guys to Gitmo.
You being 100% certain that the Q and McCain are merely a coincidence, or 100% ruling out that Q is real ... doesn't appeal to me as being very wise based on what I've seen. There are too many coincidences.
Another random coincidence off the top of my head, there being a Q stocking in a whitehouse photo.
You can argue that Q may or may not be military intelligence. You cannot argue that Q coordinates with Trump and the whitehouse. There's no disputing that, only the implications of what Trump and Q coordinating means.