Respectfully, are you sure you want to commit to that assertion so completely? Every day or so, I see posts from non-handshake accounts expressing a desire for public arrests. Why public?

There's two misconceptions in your above statement. The first one, that ego is the only reason for public arrests, and the second one is that public arrests would even necessarily need be associated with Q.

Take for instance the 2000+ mules. If a bulk majority of them were arrested, wouldn't that provide the non-ego-related benefit that future potential mules would stop because the risk is too high?

And if the 2000+ mules were arrested, why would anyone even tie it to Q rather than just say it was Dinesh D'Souza who caused all the arrests to happen?

but do you feel that comfortable suggesting that members of the Q movement have "no motivation whatsoever" to enjoy the schadenfreude of the "I told you so" moment of the Storm and the sudden confirmed, public elevation to expert on current events?

I can't speak for others but I can give you many reasons people would want public arrests that have nothing to do with "I told you so".

• public confirmation is the only way to know for certain that justice is being served (you can want justice to be served without needing to prove a point to anyone)
• public arrests give pause to others who would commit the same crime
• if someone is concerned about human trafficking and 1000s of traffickers are publicly arrested, it eases concern for the victims (having nothing to do with public vindication)

And lastly, public arrests aren't publicly going to be associated with Q. If Durham leads to the arrest of thousands of individuals, Durham will be publicly credited for the arrests.

In other words, some imaginary nerd sitting in their mother's basement, outcast by his family because he dove too deeply into Q, hoping and praying for confirmation to be accepted by his family again ... is going to be disappointed when the arrests happen, because they won't even be attributed to Q.

So yes, I would very much say that if there is any legitimacy to Q whatsoever, this Cabal would know it better than any of you.

"Know it better than any of you". People around here are extremely confused, myself included.

If the cabalists know more than I do, that isn't saying much. I thought Trump was going to win in 2020. I thought arrests would have happened by now. I don't even know if the new Q posts are from the Q team. It's 100% fog of war right now.

The thing I'm mostly certain of is that military intelligence and Trump are coordinating and have vaguely stated that they are addressing the situation and that the bad guys will be arrested.

That knowledge and all the proofs associated with it aren't actionable intel that the enemy can do anything with.

And to be clear, I cringe when anyone posts statements of fact like they know what's going on behind the scenes, as though they have an insider connection.

People are dumb. Criminals get caught leaving behind evidence all the time

Put yourself in Hunter's head. A laptop, with every email you've ever made in the last decade filled with incriminating evidence. Photos of you having sex with minors, even incest. Information that would absolutely cause your entire family to crash and burn.

And you leave it at a repair place and forget about it.

It went from the most valuable communication asset (he wrote or read over 128k emails that span over a decade if I remember properly), with a complete log of his decadence with photos of him having sex with minors ... to something he just forgot about? I don't see that being the most probable explanation.

They weren't proven wrong. They just give up.

In the hypothetical future where arrests never happen, the only one who will care whether they were proven wrong or gave up is probably just you.

Respectfully, are you sure you want to commit to that assertion so completely? Every day or so, I see posts from non-handshake accounts expressing a desire for public arrests. Why public?

There's two misconceptions in your above statement. The first one, that ego is the only reason for public arrests, and the second one is that public arrests would even necessarily need be associated with Q.

Take for instance the 2000+ mules. If a bulk majority of them were arrested, wouldn't that provide the non-ego-related benefit that future potential mules would stop because the risk is too high?

And if the 2000+ mules were arrested, why would anyone even tie it to Q rather than just say it was Dinesh D'Souza who caused all the arrests to happen?

but do you feel that comfortable suggesting that members of the Q movement have "no motivation whatsoever" to enjoy the schadenfreude of the "I told you so" moment of the Storm and the sudden confirmed, public elevation to expert on current events?

I can't speak for others but I can give you many reasons people would want public arrests that have nothing to do with "I told you so".

• public confirmation is the only way to know for certain that justice is being served (you can want justice to be served without needing to prove a point to anyone)
• public arrests give pause to others who would commit the same crime
• if someone is concerned about human trafficking and 1000s of traffickers are publicly arrested, it eases concern for the victims (having nothing to do with public vindication)

And lastly, public arrests aren't publicly going to be associated with Q. If Durham leads to the arrest of thousands of individuals, Durham will be publicly credited for the arrests.

In other words, some imaginary nerd sitting in their mother's basement, outcast by his family because he dove too deeply into Q, hoping and praying for confirmation to be accepted by his family again ... is going to be disappointed when the arrests happen, because they won't even be attributed to Q.

So yes, I would very much say that if there is any legitimacy to Q whatsoever, this Cabal would know it better than any of you.

"Know it better than any of you". People around here are extremely confused, myself included.

If the cabalists know more than I do, that isn't saying much. I thought Trump was going to win in 2020. I thought arrests would have happened by now. I don't even know if the new Q posts are from the Q team. It's 100% fog of war right now.

The thing I'm mostly certain of is that military intelligence and Trump are coordinating and have vaguely stated that they are addressing the situation and that the bad guys will be arrested.

That knowledge and all the proofs associated with it aren't actionable intel that the enemy can do anything with.

And to be clear, I cringe when anyone posts statements of fact like they know what's going on behind the scenes, as though they have an insider connection.

People are dumb. Criminals get caught leaving behind evidence all the time

Put yourself in Hunter's head. A laptop, with every email you've ever made in the last decade filled with incriminating evidence. Photos of you having sex with minors, even incest. Information that would absolutely cause your entire family to crash and burn.

And you leave it at a repair place and forget about it.

It went from the most valuable communication asset (he wrote or read over 128k emails that span over a decade if I remember properly), with a complete log of his decadence with photos of him having sex with minors ... to something he just forgot about? I don't see that being the most probably explanation.

They weren't proven wrong. They just give up.

In the hypothetical future where arrests never happen, the only one who will care whether they were proven wrong or gave up is probably just you.

Respectfully, are you sure you want to commit to that assertion so completely? Every day or so, I see posts from non-handshake accounts expressing a desire for public arrests. Why public?

There's two misconceptions in your above statement. The first one, that ego is the only reason for public arrests, and the second one is that public arrests would even necessarily need be associated with Q.

Take for instance the 2000+ mules. If a bulk majority of them were arrested, wouldn't that provide the non-ego-related benefit that future potential mules would stop because the risk is too high?

And if the 2000+ mules were arrested, why would anyone even tie it to Q rather than just say it was Dinesh D'Souza who caused all the arrests to happen?

but do you feel that comfortable suggesting that members of the Q movement have "no motivation whatsoever" to enjoy the schadenfreude of the "I told you so" moment of the Storm and the sudden confirmed, public elevation to expert on current events?

I can't speak for others but I can give you many reasons people would want public arrests that have nothing to do with "I told you so".

• public confirmation is the only way to know for certain that justice is being served (you can want justice to be served without needing to prove a point to anyone)
• public arrests give pause to others who would commit the same crime
• if someone is concerned about human trafficking and 1000s of traffickers are publicly arrested, it eases concern for the victims (having nothing to do with public vindication)

And lastly, public arrests aren't publicly going to be associated with Q. If Durham leads to the arrest of thousands of individuals, Durham will be publicly credited for the arrests.

In other words, some imaginary nerd sitting in their mother's basement, outcast by his family because he dove too deeply into Q, hoping and praying for confirmation to be accepted by his family again ... is going to be disappointed when the arrests happen, because they won't even be attributed to Q.

So yes, I would very much say that if there is any legitimacy to Q whatsoever, this Cabal would know it better than any of you.

"Know it better than any of you". People around here are extremely confused, myself included.

If the cabalists know more than I do, that isn't saying much. I thought Trump was going to win in 2020. I thought arrests would have happened by now. I don't even know if the new Q posts are from the Q team. It's 100% fog of war right now.

The thing I'm mostly certain of is that military intelligence and Trump are coordinating and have vaguely stated that they are addressing the situation and that the bad guys will be arrested.

That knowledge and all the proofs associated with it aren't actionable intel that the enemy can do anything with.

And to be clear, I cringe when anyone posts statements of fact like they know what's going on behind the scenes, as though they have an insider connection.

People are dumb. Criminals get caught leaving behind evidence all the time

Put yourself in Hunter's head. A laptop, with every email you've ever made in the last decade filled with incriminating evidence. Photos of you having sex with minors, even incest. Information that would absolutely cause your entire family to crash and burn.

And you leave it at a repair place and forget about it.

It went from the most valuable communication asset (he wrote or read over 128k emails that span over a decade if I remember properly), with a complete log of his decadence with photos of him having sex with minors ... to something he just forgot about? I don't see that being possible.

They weren't proven wrong. They just give up.

In the hypothetical future where arrests never happen, the only one who will care whether they were proven wrong or gave up is probably just you.

Respectfully, are you sure you want to commit to that assertion so completely? Every day or so, I see posts from non-handshake accounts expressing a desire for public arrests. Why public?

There's two misconceptions in your above statement. The first one, that ego is the only reason for public arrests, and the second one is that public arrests would even necessarily need be associated with Q.

Take for instance the 2000+ mules. If a bulk majority of them were arrested, wouldn't that provide the non-ego-related benefit that future potential mules would stop because the risk is too high?

And if the 2000+ mules were arrested, why would anyone even tie it to Q rather than just say it was Dinesh D'Souza who caused all the arrests to happen?

but do you feel that comfortable suggesting that members of the Q movement have "no motivation whatsoever" to enjoy the schadenfreude of the "I told you so" moment of the Storm and the sudden confirmed, public elevation to expert on current events?

I can't speak for others but I can give you many reasons people would want public arrests that have nothing to do with "I told you so".

• public confirmation is the only way to know for certain that justice is being served (you can want justice to be served without needing to prove a point to anyone)
• public arrests give pause to others who would commit the same crime
• if someone is concerned about human trafficking and 1000s of traffickers are publicly arrested, it eases concern for the victims (having nothing to do with public vindication)

And lastly, public arrests aren't publicly going to be associated with Q. If Durham leads to the arrest of thousands of individuals, Durham will be publicly credited for the arrests.

In other words, some imaginary nerd sitting in their mother's basement, outcast by his family because he dove too deeply into Q, hoping and praying for confirmation to be accepted by his family again ... is going to be disappointed when the arrests happen, because they won't even be attributed to Q.

So yes, I would very much say that if there is any legitimacy to Q whatsoever, this Cabal would know it better than any of you.

"Know it better than any of you". People around here are extremely confused, myself included.

If the cabalists know more than I do, that isn't saying much. I thought Trump was going to win in 2020. I thought arrests would have happened by now. I don't even know if the new Q posts are from the Q team. It's 100% fog of war right now.

The thing I'm mostly certain of is that military intelligence and Trump are coordinating and have stated in vague that they are addressing the situation and that the bad guys will be arrested.

That knowledge and all the proofs associated with it aren't actionable intel that the enemy can do anything with.

And to be clear, I cringe when anyone posts statements of fact like they know what's going on behind the scenes, as though they have an insider connection.

People are dumb. Criminals get caught leaving behind evidence all the time

Put yourself in Hunter's head. A laptop, with every email you've ever made in the last decade filled with incriminating evidence. Photos of you having sex with minors, even incest. Information that would absolutely cause your entire family to crash and burn.

And you leave it at a repair place and forget about it.

It went from the most valuable communication asset (he wrote or read over 128k emails that span over a decade if I remember properly), with a complete log of his decadence with photos of him having sex with minors ... to something he just forgot about? I don't see that being possible.

They weren't proven wrong. They just give up.

In the hypothetical future where arrests never happen, the only one who will care whether they were proven wrong or gave up is probably just you.