See, I've looked into the whole Tartaria thing some time ago and I felt like there was a whole lot of jumping to wild conclusions based on little evidence. Maybe the documentary wasn't well done or I'm just daft but I simply couldn't understand what exactly the theory was beyond "there was mudfloods at some point therefore all of history is a lie and they actually wore wigs in the 18th century as a defense against energy weapons." I'm not even kidding.

I can understand that they lie about history, of course they do. We see them twist facts all the time. But does that suggest that literally nothing happened like they say it does? Does that mean there was no civil war (like that documentary claimed)? I think some people start to discover they've been lying to us and then use that as an excuse to toss out everything.

I'd need to see a lot more compelling evidence before I gave the Tartaria stuff any more credence.

See, I've looked into the whole Tartaria thing some time ago and I felt like there was a whole lot of jumping to wild conclusions based on little evidence. Maybe the documentary wasn't well done or I'm just daft but I simply couldn't understand what exactly the theory was beyond "there was mudfloods at some point therefore all of history is a lie and they actually wore wigs in the 17th century as a defense against energy weapons." I'm not even kidding.

I can understand that they lie about history, of course they do. We see them twist facts all the time. But does that suggest that literally nothing happened like they say it does? Does that mean there was no civil war (like that documentary claimed)? I think some people start to discover they've been lying to us and then use that as an excuse to toss out everything.

I'd need to see a lot more compelling evidence before I gave the Tartaria stuff any more credence.