He was sickened and was deeply affected by what he saw.
What SPECIFICALLY did he claim to see? And was he a jew?
I know many people who's entire immediate and extended families were wiped out and only they survived.
That means the entire family was NOT wiped out. Typhoid killed a lot of people in Europe at that time, and starvation at the end of the war (with no food supplies) probably killed some more. Sad, but let's be real about what happened.
Many Jews were still kept in camps alongside their German overlords.
Many Germans were held in camps by Americans (Eisenhower). There may have been some German jews in that mix.
So, I think we need to approach this whole issue of the denial of wartime atrocities carefully. I put more stock in those that were actually there and saw what happened. Are they all lying?
Many of them have been liars, yes. Many jews have ADMITTED it on camera that they lied. And why would that be?
Because the jewish religion teaches that it is ok to lie IF it promotes a "good cause" in the jew's eyes. They have used this as their excuse, such as "Sure it was not true, but people must remember the horror." Never mind that the horror was a made-up fantasy, which is why they had to lie about it in the first place.
There is no one living that can refute what appears to be new evidence. How convenient.
Yes, that tends to happen when you sumarily execute people without a trial, or provide only a kangaroo court hearing for those who were tortured into confession. You tend to be left with no one who can refute what the surviving liars have to say.
What benefit can be derived by trying to downplay the extent of the extermination?
If there was no extermination, then there is no benefit, and only harm, by believing lies.
The truth is the ONLY thing that matters.
If people can be led to believe that such a thing did not happen, then they would be less likely to think it could happen in our day?
And that is EXACTLY what many jews who admitted to lying about it said. They said they lied so that it would never happen again (nevermind that "it" didn't happen in the first place).
Look at all the vaxxine injury deniers. They wouldn't kill thousands of people, if not millions, like that - now would they? They would then be less likely to believe that we can be rounded up and killed in quarantine camps now.
You have GOT to be fucking kidding me. The people who believe the bullshit Holocaust story ... are the EXACT people who INSISTED that non-vaxxers BE ROUNDED UP and put into quarantine camps.
They are a strange breed because they deny that anyone is going to round up people ... and then when the Coof hits ... they INSIST that people be rounded up.
These people are NOT thinking rationally. Maybe if they understood the lies surrounding 1930's Germany, they would be better equipped to think it through.
Maybe the lies are a part of the reason why they tend to not think critically. If you believe in lies, you are bound to be a little off in your thinking.
It amazes me how people can discount the testimony of millions that were actually there and basically call them liars.
Now, THAT is a lie.
There were NOT "millions" of people who testified to gas chambers and mass murder AND were there to see it (but somehow, these "eye witnesses" were the only ones who did NOT get such treatment).
Nobody denies there were prison camps. There were also prison camps in America for the Japanese.
But as far as a program to exterminate jews in German and Polish prison camps, via gas chambers, there are NOT "millions" of eye witness accounts.
There MIGHT be dozens. And many of those have ADMITTED that they were NOT there and were NOT eye witnesses, though they CLAIMED to be. And they specifically say they lied because they BELIEVED the stories and they wanted to preserve the stories.
IOW, it is ok to lie if it promotes a "good" cause.
That is EXACTLY what the jews are taught by their Talmud, so it should not be a surprise when they follow their religion.
And ... this is WHY so many people have hated jews throughout history. It is not merely because of their religion. It is because of their BEHAVIOR, which is influenced by their religion.
Not ALL jews act this way. But ALL jews BENEFIT from other jews who DO, and so most jews are not honest enough to acknowledge it.
Jews, more than anyone else, need to WAKE THE FUCK UP about the history of WHY so many people hated their ancestors. Maybe they can change the world, if they do. Just like this rabbi explains:
He was sickened and was deeply affected by what he saw.
What SPECIFICALLY did he claim to see? And was he a jew?
I know many people who's entire immediate and extended families were wiped out and only they survived.
That means the entire family was NOT wiped out. Typhoid killed a lot of people in Europe at that time, and starvation at the end of the war (with no food supplies) probably killed some more. Sad, but let's be real about what happened.
Many Jews were still kept in camps alongside their German overlords.
Many Germans were held in camps by Americans (Eisenhower). There may have been some German jews in that mix.
So, I think we need to approach this whole issue of the denial of wartime atrocities carefully. I put more stock in those that were actually there and saw what happened. Are they all lying?
Many of them have been liars, yes. Many jews have ADMITTED it on camera that they lied. And why would that be?
Because the jewish religion teaches that it is ok to lie IF it promotes a "good cause" in the jew's eyes. They have used this as their excuse, such as "Sure it was not true, but people must remember the horror." Never mind that the horror was a made-up fantasy, which is why they had to lie about it in the first place.
There is no one living that can refute what appears to be new evidence. How convenient.
Yes, that tends to happen when you sumarily execute people without a trial, or provide only a kangaroo court hearing for those who were tortured into confession. You tend to be left with no one who can refute what the surviving liars have to say.
What benefit can be derived by trying to downplay the extent of the extermination?
If there was no extermination, then there is no benefit, and only harm, by believing lies.
The truth is the ONLY thing that matters.
If people can be led to believe that such a thing did not happen, then they would be less likely to think it could happen in our day?
And that is EXACTLY what many jews who admitted to lying about it said. They said they lied so that it would never happen again (nevermind that "it" didn't happen in the first place).
Look at all the vaxxine injury deniers. They wouldn't kill thousands of people, if not millions, like that - now would they? They would then be less likely to believe that we can be rounded up and killed in quarantine camps now.
You have GOT to be fucking kidding me. The people who believe the bullshit Holocaust story ... are the EXACT people who INSISTED that non-vaxxers BE ROUNDED UP and put into quarantine camps.
They are a strange breed because they deny that anyone is going to round up people ... and then when the Coof hits ... they INSIST that people be rounded up.
These people are NOT thinking rationally. Maybe if they understood the lies surrounding 1930's Germany, they would be better equipped to think it through.
Maybe the lies are a part of the reason why they tend to not think critically. If you believe in lies, you are bound to be a little off in your thinking.
It amazes me how people can discount the testimony of millions that were actually there and basically call them liars.
Now, THAT is a lie.
There are NOT "millions" of people who testified to gas chambers and mass murder AND were there to see it (but somehow, they were the ones who did NOT get such treatment).
Nobody denies there were prison camps. There were also prison camps in America for the Japanese.
But as far as a program to exterminate jews in German and Polish prison camps, via gas chambers, there are NOT "millions" of eye witness accounts.
There MIGHT be dozens. And many of those have ADMITTED that they were NOT there and were NOT eye witnesses, though they CLAIMED to be. And they specifically say they lied because they BELIEVED the stories and they wanted to preserve the stories.
IOW, it is ok to lie if it promotes a "good" cause.
That is EXACTLY what the jews are taught by their Talmud, so it should not be a surprise when they follow their religion.
And ... this is WHY so many people have hated jews throughout history. It is not merely because of their religion. It is because of their BEHAVIOR, which is influenced by their religion.
Not ALL jews act this way. But ALL jews BENEFIT from other jews who DO, and so most jews are not honest enough to acknowledge it.
Jews, more than anyone else, need to WAKE THE FUCK UP about the history of WHY so many people hated their ancestors. Maybe they can change the world, if they do. Just like this rabbi explains:
He was sickened and was deeply affected by what he saw.
What SPECIFICALLY did he claim to see? And was he a jew?
I know many people who's entire immediate and extended families were wiped out and only they survived.
That means the entire family was NOT wiped out. Typhoid killed a lot of people in Europe at that time, and starvation at the end of the war (with no food supplies) probably killed some more. Sad, but let's be real about what happened.
Many Jews were still kept in camps alongside their German overlords.
Many Germans were held in camps by Americans (Eisenhower). There may have been some German jews in that mix.
So, I think we need to approach this whole issue of the denial of wartime atrocities carefully. I put more stock in those that were actually there and saw what happened. Are they all lying?
Many of them have been liars, yes. Many jews have ADMITTED it on camera that they lied. And why would that be?
Because the jewish religion teaches that it is ok to lie IF it promotes a "good cause" in the jew's eyes. They have used this as their excuse, such as "Sure it was not true, but people must remember the horror." Never mind that the horror was a made-up fantasy, which is why they had to lie about it in the first place.
There is no one living that can refute what appears to be new evidence. How convenient.
Yes, that tends to happen when you sumarily execute people without a trial, or provide only a kangaroo court hearing for those who were tortured into confession. You tend to be left with no one who can refute what the surviving liars have to say.
What benefit can be derived by trying to downplay the extent of the extermination?
If there was no extermination, then there is no benefit, and only harm, by believing lies.
The truth is the ONLY thing that matters.
If people can be led to believe that such a thing did not happen, then they would be less likely to think it could happen in our day?
And that is EXACTLY what many jews who admitted to lying about it said. They said they lied so that it would never happen again (nevermind that "it" didn't happen in the first place).
Look at all the vaxxine injury deniers. They wouldn't kill thousands of people, if not millions, like that - now would they? They would then be less likely to believe that we can be rounded up and killed in quarantine camps now.
You have GOT to be fucking kidding me. The people who believe the bullshit Holocaust story ... are the EXACT people who INSISTED that non-vaxxers BE ROUNDED UP and put into quarantine camps.
They are a strange breed because they deny that anyone is going to round up people ... and then when the Coof hits ... they INSIST that people be rounded up.
These people are NOT thinking rationally. Maybe if they understood the lies surrounding 1930's Germany, they would be better equipped to think it through.
Maybe the lies are a part of the reason why they tend to not think critically. If you believe in lies, you are bound to be a little off in your thinking.
It amazes me how people can discount the testimony of millions that were actually there and basically call them liars.
Now, THAT is a lie.
There are NOT "millions" of people who testified to gas chambers and mass murder AND were there to see it (but somehow, they were the ones who did NOT get such treatment).
Nobody denies there were prison camps. There were also prison camps in America for the Japanese.
But as far as a program to exterminate jews in German and Polish prison camps, via gas chambers, there are NOT "millions" of eye witness accounts.
There MIGHT be dozens. And many of those have ADMITTED that they were NOT there and were NOT eye witnesses, though they CLAIMED to be. And they specifically say they lied because they BELIEVED the stories and they wanted to preserve the stories.
IOW, it is ok to lie if it promotes a "good" cause.
That is EXACTLY what the jews are taught by their Talmud, so it should not be a surprise when they follow their religion.