It seems readily predictable by assuming that Donald Trump denies the existence of problems he can't solve, and then assuming he would readily and happily take credit for the solution (the vaccine) once it became available to him.

In the beginning, before Trump won in 2016, I started following a guy named Scott Adams, the creator of the Dilbert cartoons. He has his own issues, but what I gained from listening to him is that he's a professionally trained hypnotist who was an expert in various persuasion techniques.

He began breaking down Trump's speeches, tweets, interviews etc. and explained the persuasion power behind Trump's public interactions.

Scott Adams is highly against Q, and treats it like its far worse than BLM. But he considered Trump to be a master of persuasion. I think Trump's persona, which certainly can rub some people the wrong way, is highly calculated. His repetition and dumbed-down vocabulary serve a purpose. You can watch older videos of Trump where he is far more fluent and uses higher word choices. Knowing what to look for, I see the strategies, the pace-and-lead, the Sun Tzu (he even named his book similar to the Art of War).

"Denies the existence of problems he can't solve, happily taking credit for the solution" ... reads like you think he's a bumbling idiot with no strategy who just inexplicably stumbled into being elected president.

Trump was highly against vaccinations in the past. He knows his base better than anyone, and fully realizes how much we loathe forced vaccinations. He knows better than anyone how covid has completely destroyed our economy.

Why did he push it? I don't know for certain, but the "turn the sub into the torpedo to disarm it" sounds plausible to me. Medical tyranny is a worldwide coordinated phenomenon (implying there is a coordinating cabal and it not just being 10's of 1000's of individual criminals). If it was going to happen anyway, perhaps the best strategy was to have it happen under his oversight so there's a limit to how destructive it could be.

Do you have a lot of experience hanging out with hardcore drug addicts?

You're framing Hunter as the worst kind of drug addict who is so debilitated that he cannot function in society. I don't think that's accurate.

It's clear he was a high performing bagman for his father, who flew around the world collecting money on Joe's behalf for at least a decade. He wouldn't be capable of that if he were as bad as you framed him.

Well, I will care, because I'm not entirely sure what happens with you guys if the future you believe saves us from a world that is utterly catastrophic never happens.

I think you already described what happens. " In the other direction, we're just waiting for believers to lose faith on their own accord. They weren't proven wrong. They just give up."

If Trump's 2nd term comes and goes and Hillary is never actually arrested or any other significant happenings in terms of justice with trafficking, I personally will simply focus more on the local level and ignore the more global problems that are apparently unfixable.

As a note, I'll state openly that I'm not a child and won't consider retiring this conversation as a "forfeit" by either side.

The only reason I continue is because your points are plausible. I don't deny they are possible, I just don't think they're probable. You don't strike me as a concern troll and I don't get offended at people who merely see things differently.

If you have any other questions I don't mind answering.

It seems readily predictable by assuming that Donald Trump denies the existence of problems he can't solve, and then assuming he would readily and happily take credit for the solution (the vaccine) once it became available to him.

In the beginning, before Trump won in 2016, I started following a guy named Scott Adams, the creator of the Dilbert cartoons. He has his own issues, but what I gained from listening to him is that he's a professionally trained hypnotist who was an expert in various persuasion techniques.

He began breaking down Trump's speeches, tweets, interviews etc. and explained the persuasion power behind Trump's public interactions.

Scott Adams is highly against Q, and treats it like its far worse than BLM. But he considered Trump to be a master of persuasion.

"Denies the existence of problems he can't solve, happily taking credit for the solution" ... reads like you think he's a bumbling idiot with no strategy who just inexplicably stumbled into being elected president.

Trump was highly against vaccinations in the past. He knows his base better than anyone, and fully realizes how much we loathe forced vaccinations. He knows better than anyone how covid has completely destroyed our economy.

Why did he push it? I don't know for certain, but the "turn the sub into the torpedo to disarm it" sounds plausible to me. Medical tyranny is a worldwide coordinated phenomenon (implying there is a coordinating cabal and it not just being 10's of 1000's of individual criminals). If it was going to happen anyway, perhaps the best strategy was to have it happen under his oversight so there's a limit to how destructive it could be.

Do you have a lot of experience hanging out with hardcore drug addicts?

You're framing Hunter as the worst kind of drug addict who is so debilitated that he cannot function in society. I don't think that's accurate.

It's clear he was a high performing bagman for his father, who flew around the world collecting money on Joe's behalf for at least a decade. He wouldn't be capable of that if he were as bad as you framed him.

Well, I will care, because I'm not entirely sure what happens with you guys if the future you believe saves us from a world that is utterly catastrophic never happens.

I think you already described what happens. " In the other direction, we're just waiting for believers to lose faith on their own accord. They weren't proven wrong. They just give up."

If Trump's 2nd term comes and goes and Hillary is never actually arrested or any other significant happenings in terms of justice with trafficking, I personally will simply focus more on the local level and ignore the more global problems that are apparently unfixable.

As a note, I'll state openly that I'm not a child and won't consider retiring this conversation as a "forfeit" by either side.

The only reason I continue is because your points are plausible. I don't deny they are possible, I just don't think they're probable. You don't strike me as a concern troll and I don't get offended at people who merely see things differently.

If you have any other questions I don't mind answering.