science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even when applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would cease to exist. The power inherent in "trust the science" would immediately disappear, and it would be appreciated how laughable that statement is.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even when applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear. The power inherent in "trust the science" would immediately disappear, and it would be appreciated how laughable that statement is.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear. The power inherent in "trust the science" would immediately disappear, and it would be appreciated how laughable that statement is.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear. The power inherent in "trust the science" would be appreciated for how laughable that statement is.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, along with the fact that science, even applied correctly, can lead us further from the Truth, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.

science is the way to truth not truth in and of itself.

Science is a path that can bring us closer and closer to the Truth. It can never tell us the Truth. It is completely impossible for science to ever make statements of Truth. The fundamental nature of science is to not trust the science, AKA to question the science.

I assert this is an important concept. One that all too few understand. Implicit in these statements is that science can also NOT bring us closer to the Truth. In other words, even a proper application of the process of science can bring us further from the Truth of the nature of Reality, either some piece of it, or Reality in total. Science is only a process. It is a tool. It is a very, very useful tool, but it can never be Truth, because it is not designed to produce Truth.

to say science confirms nothing seems inaccurate or hyperbolic

Science can NEVER confirm anything. Science can't make any statements of certainty. It can only give better and better probabilities that a specific input to output program is correctly modelled. That is the function of science. It is a tool to create better and better models of Reality. The models are not Reality. Reality does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of our models. When the models disagree, which is all the time, Reality wins. Reality is the Truth. Science is the model creator. Science can never describe Reality, it can only describe the model.

Thus, science is not Truth, and can never "confirm" anything. That is the most accurate statement that can be made about science in this regard, and is not only not hyperbolic, but is an essential thing to understand about science. If people understood that, I suggest all the science fuckery would disappear.

Science is useful, it is not Truth.