My point is: the photo is from 2019. I thought that would be clear.

Note: the second link you posted uses the SAME photo. ????

Ref: https://www.anp.nl/blog/48/boerenprotesten-ogen-fotografen

My point is: the photo is from 2019. I thought that would be clear.

Note: the second link you posted uses the SAME photo. ????

Ref: https://www.anp.nl/blog/48/boerenprotesten-ogen-fotografen

Tineye returns around 53 examples of the photo you've posted here. About ten of them are used in the then current time frame. About 70% of them are being used out of context, giving people false information. About 15% of the returns are posted in recent months.

If that doesn't tell you that there is a problem with how information is being shared, what does?

My point is, the photo is from 2019. I thought that would be clear.

Note: the second link you posted uses the SAME photo.

Ref: https://www.anp.nl/blog/48/boerenprotesten-ogen-fotografen

Someone else posted a random photo of a vehicle with iron cladding and stated: Dutch Farmers are putting armor on their tractors. The photo was from something else completely.

It's just the downside of having a lot of citizen journalists and folks who are sharing info; false info comes through.

Not a big deal, but something to keep tabs on, imo.

My point is, the photo is from 2019. I thought that would be clear.

Someone else posted a random photo of a vehicle with iron cladding and stated: Dutch Farmers are putting armor on their tractors. The photo was from something else completely.

It's just the downside of having a lot of citizen journalists and folks who are sharing info; false info comes through.

Not a big deal, but something to keep tabs on, imo.