I call BS to this article. There is NO reference to a SCOTUS ruling. If anything the article alludes to a failure to a FOIA request submitted by ICANN (Informed Consent Action Network) to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to provide records for vaccine safety and efficacy.
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 it compels DHHS to take responsibility for improving efficacy and safety of vaccines; and charges them with continuous monitoring and improving of adverse event reporting. The DHHS is also tasked with providing a report on improvements by the Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccine clause to the Congress at least every 2 years.
The DHHS stonewalled, so ICANN brought a lawsuit forth to compel DHHS to provide these records. In court DHHS admitted there was NO RECORDS and that they have been in violation of US federal law for over 30 years. Can an government agency leadership be guilty of being an accessory to a crime? Can the legislature leadership, who made the law violate the law?
This only proves there is no evidence of vaxxxine safety and efficacy provided to Congress for over 30 years. This lawsuit was in 2018. So this means, that the vaxxxine industry has violated the law since 1988 (and Congress permitted them to do so). It was in 1990 that the astronomical rise of autism started.
There is NO SCOTUS ruling on this that I can find.
I call BS to this article. There is NO reference to a SCOTUS ruling. If anything the article alludes to a failure to a FOIA request submitted by ICANN (Informed Consent Action Network) to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to provide records for vaccine safety and efficacy.
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 it compels DHHS to take responsibility for improving efficacy and safety of vaccines; and charges them with continuous monitoring and improving of adverse event reporting. The DHHS is also tasked with providing a report on improvements by the Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccine clause to the Congress at least every 2 years.
The DHHS stonewalled, so ICANN brought a lawsuit forth to compel DHHS to provide these records. In court DHHS admitted there was NO RECORDS and that they have been in violation of US federal law for over 30 years. Can an government agency leadership be guilty of being an accessory to a crime?
This only proves there is no evidence of vaxxxine safety and efficacy provided to Congress for over 30 years. This lawsuit was in 2018. So this means, that the vaxxxine industry has violated the law since 1988 (and Congress permitted them to do so). It was in 1990 that the astronomical rise of autism started.
There is NO SCOTUS ruling on this that I can find.