There are indeed peculiarities to solve here. I am still going over this, in the confidence that eventually the truth will show itself.

In my view, people in Europe, with it's different tribes, have certain ways of living in common and there are differences.

The struggle for hegemony has been object of study by the founding fathers. And it is interesting to contemplate these events.

During the period 300 AD till about 1300 AD the Netherlands was under water. When people started to drain swamps, new land was created. Often in remote areas, people started to work together. Then the Lords and Ladies started to try to exert power of these areas, and exacting tolls and taxes, with the aim to bring these people away from their free state into bondage.

Because these Lords and ladies came from several families vying for the same piece of land, thus creating a paradox between them, the same object was aimed for. This left many in limbo towards the choice of what kind of Lord instead of freedom vs bondage of varying degrees.

In this sense, the process of the emergence of the of cities in Europe can also be categorized in this struggle. Often, cities we're capable of exacting privileges from the higher ups. Think Hanze League and their relationship to the Holy Roman Emperor.

However, it was still a choice between Lord one, Lord two, Lord three, etc with varying degrees of bondage.

The working together between people happened on different foundations. Some were lax, other were more oriented towards the maintenance of a social arrangement.

In this sense, I appreciate the emergence of communism, socialism, fascism etc, all frames of political thought with varying degrees of bondage, but bondage nonetheless.

And, we also see the positing of the argument that such systems can provide a greater degree of freedom, because of x,y,z. Of course this is bul-lcrap, whether on plain sight, or deeper analysis.

It panders to the direct needs in expense of the birth -state: freedom and pursuit of happiness. And if push comes to shove: the life of the lovers of freedom.

These people pushing these agendas are all part of the same cloth, the same hand, invariably pursuing the same object: to reduce every single man, woman and child under absolute despotism.

And it can only exist when people surrender their ability to think freely. That is why you see programming and brainwashing all around in these systems.

That is why we see the combination of corrupt politicians, the press and tech companies. Very smartly and sneakily have they inserted themselves into our lives.

It is there for to be expected that the fingers of the same hand, enjoy each other's company. And as an added bonus, under secrecy and with graft, create a Hegelian dialectic. Whereas the real choice is escaping attention.

Gehlen's organization was very well informed on the Soviet Union. Especially the military intelligence. From a usefulness perspective, this was simply a smart move. Why invent the wheel, when the wheel has already been invented, under the guise of the Free world against tyranny, yet those organizations were already infiltrated with the corruption from the same hand that has for centuries wreaked havoc on people.

There are indeed peculiarities to solve here. I am still going over this, in the confidence that eventually the truth will show itself.

In my view, people in Europe, with it's different tribes, have certain ways of living in common and there are differences.

The struggle for hemogeny has been object of study by the founding fathers. And it is interesting to contemplate these events.

During the period 300 AD till about 1300 AD the Netherlands was under water. When people started to drain swamps, new land was created. Often in remote areas, people started to work together. Then the Lords and Ladies started to try to excert power of these areas, and exacting tolls and taxes, with the aim to bring these people away from their free state into bondage.

Because these Lords and ladies came from several families vying for the same piece of land, thus creating a paradox between them, the same object was aimed for. This left many in limbo towards the choice of what kind of Lord instead of freedom vs bondage of varying degrees.

In this sense, the process oemergencef the of cities in Ecanurope can also be categorized in this struggle. Often, cities we're capable of exacting privileges from the higher ups. Think Hanze League and their relationship to the Holy Roman Emperor.

However, it was still a choice between Lord one, Lord two, Lord three, etc with varying degrees of bondage.

The working together between people happened on different fundaments. Some were lax, other were more oriented towards the maintenance of a social arrangement.

In this sense, I appreciate the emergence of communism, socialism, fascism etc, all frames of political thought with varying degrees of bondage, but bondage nontheless.

And, we also see the positing of the argument dat such systems can provide a greater degree of freedom, because of x,y,z. Of course this is bullcrap, whether on plain sight, or deeper analysis.

It panders to the direct needs in expense of the birth -state: freedom and pursuit of happiness. And if push comes to shove: the life of the lovers of freedom.

These people pushing these agendas are all part of the same cloth, the same hand, invariably pursuing the same object: to reduce every single man, woman and child under absolute despotism.

And it can only exist when people surrender their ability to think freely. That is why you see programming and brainwashing all around in these systems.

That is why we see the combination of corrupt politicians, the press and tech companies. Very smartly and sneakily have they inserted themselves into our lives.

It is there for to be expected that the fingers of the same hand, enjoy each other's company. And as an added bonus, under secrecy and with graft, create a hegelian dialectic. Whereas the real choice is escaping attention.

Gehlens organisation was very well informed on the Soviet Union. Especially the military intelligence. From a usefulness perspective, this was simply a smart move. Why invent the wheel, when the wheel has already been invented, under the guise of the Free world against tyranny, yet those organizations were already infiltrated with the corruption from the same hand that has for centuries wreaked havoc on people.