Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You can read the entire text here:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7900/text

Search "SEC. 222" to find the relevant text.

This is just a pilot study to offer the option for individuals to eat a non-meat burger.

(a) Establishment.--Not later than March 1, 2023, the Secretary of the Navy shall establish and carry out a pilot program to offer plant- based protein options at forward operating bases for consumption by members of the Navy.

I see no indication that these products will be forced into anyone's diet or are being substituted entirely in lieu of meat products.

In fact, Rep. Greene seems to have either missed or ignored this part of the text when she Tweeted:

(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent offering livestock-based protein options alongside plant- based protein options at naval facilities identified under subsection (b).

It is absolutely worth researching the original text rather than trusting any politician to tell you what things say.

All they're doing is trying out a new item on the menu for those that want it. There are already vegetarians in the military, and they’re already skipping burgers at chow. Now they might not have to.

So... per the title, what could go wrong?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You can read the entire text here:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7900/text

Search "SEC. 222" to find the relevant text.

This is just a pilot study to offer the option for individuals to eat a non-meat burger.

(a) Establishment.--Not later than March 1, 2023, the Secretary of the Navy shall establish and carry out a pilot program to offer plant- based protein options at forward operating bases for consumption by members of the Navy.

I see no indication that these products will be forced into anyone's diet or substituted entirely for meat products.

In fact, Rep. Greene seems to have either missed or ignored this part of the text when she Tweeted:

(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent offering livestock-based protein options alongside plant- based protein options at naval facilities identified under subsection (b).

It is absolutely worth researching the original text rather than trusting any politician to tell you what things say.

All they're doing is trying out a new item on the menu for those that want it. There are already vegetarians in the military, and they’re already skipping burgers at chow. Now they might not have to.

So... per the title, what could go wrong?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You can read the entire text here:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7900/text

Search "SEC. 222" to find the relevant text.

This is just a pilot study to offer the option for such individuals to eat a non-meat burger.

(a) Establishment.--Not later than March 1, 2023, the Secretary of the Navy shall establish and carry out a pilot program to offer plant- based protein options at forward operating bases for consumption by members of the Navy.

I see no indication that these products will be forced into anyone's diet or substituted entirely for meat products.

In fact, Rep. Greene seems to have either missed or ignored this part of the text when she Tweeted:

(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent offering livestock-based protein options alongside plant- based protein options at naval facilities identified under subsection (b).

It is absolutely worth researching the original text rather than trusting any politician to tell you what things say.

All they're doing is trying out a new item on the menu for those that want it. There are already vegetarians in the military, and they’re already skipping burgers at chow. Now they might not have to.

So... per the title, what could go wrong?

1 year ago
1 score