The problem is the modern Bibles are not based on Hebrew Masoretic OT and Textus Receptus Koine Greek New Testament.

They're based on the "oldest" manuscripts, which were edited by the Alexandrian Gnostic scholars.

Codex Alexandrinus ended up in the hands of Charles I of England, who just happened to be a Roman Catholic. Codex Vaticanus was stored away in the Vatican for centuries. Codex Sinaiticus was "discovered" by Tischendorf, a supposed Protestant, who just happened to have an audience in Rome before taking a trip to a Roman Catholic convent on Mt. Sinai in Egypt, where he found the manuscript in a wastepaper basket where it had sat for centuries.

When your Old Testament translation is based on the Septuagint, a Greek translation and Vatican/Alexandrian manuscripts, instead of the original Hebrew, that's a problem.

If your Bible has a footnote for Acts 8:37, or if Acts 8:37 is missing completely, it's a sure sign it's corrupted.

The problem is the modern Bibles are not based on Hebrew Masoretic OT and Textus Receptus Koine Greek New Testament.

They're based on the "oldest" manuscripts, which were edited by the Alexandrian Gnostic scholars.

Codex Alexandrinus ended up in the hands of Charles I of England, who just happened to be a Roman Catholic. Codex Vaticanus was stored away in the Vatican for centuries. Codex Sinaiticus was "discovered" by Tischendorf, a supposed Protestant, who just happened to have an audience in Rome before taking a trip to a Roman Catholic convent on Mt. Sinai in Egypt, where he found the manuscript in a wastepaper basket where it had sat for centuries.

If your Bible has a footnote for Acts 8:37, it's corrupted.