The sheer number of NT manuscript copies (over 25k) makes your point completely irrelevant. The more copies of something you have, the better your ability to work back to what the originals said.

On top of this, your position is self refuting. The only way for you to "know" that the text was "changed" is if you have an unchanged text to compare it with.

Regarding your worship of the KJV. The discovery of manuscripts didn't stop when that translation was written. There have been 100's of additional manuscripts discovered which shed light on older translations. Translations written 400 years after the KJV have the benefit of these additional manuscripts, thereby becoming a little more "accurate" in their renditions. This is the reason why we even have a NEW King James Version (NKJV) - to take into consideration the discovery of the additional copies.

The sheer number of NT manuscript copies (over 25k) makes your point completely irrelevant. The more copies of something you have, the better your ability to work back to what the originals said.

On top of this, your position is self refuting. The only way for you to "know" that the text was "changed" is if you have an unchanged text to compare it with.