Look for these clues:

1. Focus on one obscure part of a post in attempt to discredit
2. Forum sliding-injecting unrelated or tangential "bait" topics near the top for discussion to push all the relevant comments down
3. Long comments with largely opinion or un-sauced speculation countering legitimate points (also put high in thread to push good comments down) [good practice is to create separate post and provide link with large bits of info]
4. Use of phrase "poorly-sourced", usually as a projection by someone with zero sources
5. Use of the language "regurgitation of intelligence agency talking points" to attempt to discredit post or comments
6. Injection of "what has come of this place" concern trolls to disrupt quality discussion and accumulation of sauce; and to try to discredit whole community.

These two topics will be attacked immediately and relentlessly: A. ANY mention of adrenochrome, and B. ANY mention of "name stealing", people using fake IDs, or people taking over another persona for a mission (standard spy tactics)

Look for these clues:

1. Focus on one obscure part of a post in attempt to discredit
2. Forum sliding-injecting unrelated or tangential "bait" topics near the top for discussion to push all the relevant comments down
3. Long posts with largely opinion or un-sauced speculation countering legitimate points (also put high in thread to push good comments down) [good practice is to create separate post and provide link with large bits of info]
4. Use of phrase "poorly-sourced", usually as a projection by someone with zero sources
5. Use of the language "regurgitation of intelligence agency talking points" to attempt to discredit post or comments
6. Injection of "what has come of this place" concern trolls to disrupt quality discussion and accumulation of sauce; and to try to discredit whole community.

These two topics will be attacked immediately and relentlessly: A. ANY mention of adrenochrome, and B. ANY mention of "name stealing", people using fake IDs, or people taking over another persona for a mission (standard spy tactics)

Look for these clues:

1. Focus on one obscure part of a post in attempt to discredit
2. Forum sliding-injecting unrelated or tangential "bait" topics near the top for discussion to push all the relevant comments down
3. Long posts with largely opinion or un-sauced speculation countering legitimate points (also put high in thread to push good comments down)
4. Use of phrase "poorly-sourced", usually as a projection by someone with zero sources
5. Use of the language "regurgitation of intelligence agency talking points" to attempt to discredit post or comments
6. Injection of "what has come of this place" concern trolls to disrupt quality discussion and accumulation of sauce; and to try to discredit whole community.

These two topics will be attacked immediately and relentlessly: A. ANY mention of adrenochrome, and B. ANY mention of "name stealing", people using fake IDs, or people taking over another persona for a mission (standard spy tactics)