What made the tests positive?

ALL the tests are/were fake. Both 100% false positives, and 100% false negatives.

PCR is a duplication tool, like a copy machine. It is NOT a diagnostic tool. It cannot tell you if the thing being replicated can or did make you sick.

MOST "Covid positives" are nothing more than a false positive of a fake test. MOST of those people did NOT have any symptoms of sickness -- because they were not sick.

The genetic material being looked at is the person's own genetic material and/or other assorted genetic material used in the fake process that is used for evaluatoin. The computer model used to generate the so-called genetic sequence is also fake, and nothing more than a guess by the computer programmer.

what exactly made people sick

Same thing that happens EVERY year. The flu statistics went down to almost zero in 2020. Those people who DID show symptoms of sickness ("flu") were going through the same detox process that happens EVERY year, when natural vitamin D levels are low (Winter). It was simply called "Covid" instead of "Flu." Old people in nursing homes, who were in ill health, are the ones who died -- same as EVERY year.

Watch the video again. The scientists found no Covid, but were told by CDC to call it Covid anyway. THERE is your answer.

Everybody ELSE who was a "Covid case" (meaning, a false positive of a fake PCR test) but were NOT sick, were simply declared to be a "Covid case" due to the false positive. It was a POLITICAL diagnosis, and NOT a medical diagnosis.

EVERY bit of it is a scam. That goes for the non-existent variants, too.

This is why more than 100 labs and government institutions around the world, via FOIA type requests, (a) have NEVER provided a sample of the "virus," (b) have stated ON THE RECORD that they cannot identify ANY lab in the world that has a sample of the "virus," and (c) has NO paper in their possession that shows any experiment done anywhere in the world of any lab that has really isolated AND purified the "virus."

ALL papers that claim to have done so, are using a DIFFERENT definition of "isolate" to mean nothing more than taking a sample of bodily fluid from a single individual, and not the true definition of "isolate", which is to separate one thing from everything else.

What made the tests positive?

ALL the tests are/were fake. Both 100% false positives, and 100% false negatives.

PCR is a duplication tool, like a copy machine. It is NOT a diagnostic tool. It cannot tell you if the thing being replicated can or did make you sick.

MOST "Covid positives" are nothing more than a false positive of a fake test. MOST of those people did NOT have any symptoms of sickness -- because they were not sick.

The genetic material being looked at is the person's own genetic material and/or other assorted genetic material used in the fake process that is used for evaluatoin. The computer model used to generate the so-called genetic sequence is also fake, and nothing more than a guess by the computer programmer.

what exactly made people sick

Same thing that happens EVERY year. The flu statistics went down to almost zero in 2020. Those people who DID show symptoms of sickness ("flu") were going through the same detox process that happens EVERY year, when natural vitamin D levels are low (Winter). It was simply called "Covid" instead of "Flu." Old people in nursing homes, who were in ill health, are the ones who died -- same as EVERY year.

Watch the video again. The scientists found no covid, but were told by CDC to call it covid anyway. THERE is your answer.

Everybody ELSE who was a "Covid case" (meaning, a false positive of a fake PCR test) but were NOT sick, were simply declared to be a "Covid case" due to the false positive. It was a POLITICAL diagnosis, and NOT a medical diagnosis.

EVERY bit of it is a scam. That goes for the non-existent variants, too.

This is why more than 100 labs and government institutions around the world, via FOIA type requests, (a) have NEVER provided a sample of the "virus," (b) have stated ON THE RECORD that they cannot identify ANY lab in the world that has a sample of the "virus," and (c) has NO paper in their possession that shows any experiment done anywhere in the world of any lab that has really isolated AND purified the "virus."

ALL papers that claim to have done so, are using a DIFFERENT definition of "isolate" to mean nothing more than taking a sample of bodily fluid from a single individual, and not the true definition of "isolate", which is to separate one thing from everything else.

What made the tests positive?

ALL the tests are/were fake. Both 100% false positives, and 100% false negatives.

PCR is a duplication tool, like a copy machine. It is NOT a diagnostic tool. It cannot tell you if the thing being replicated can or did make you sick.

MOST "Covid positives" are nothing more than a false positive of a fake test. MOST of those people did NOT have any symptoms of sickness -- because they were not sick.

The genetic material being looked at is the person's own genetic material and/or other assorted genetic material used in the fake process that is used for evaluatoin. The computer model used to generate the so-called genetic sequence is also fake, and nothing more than a guess by the computer programmer.

what exactly made people sick

Same thing that happens EVERY year. The flu statistics went down to almost zero in 2020. Those people who DID show symptoms of sickness ("flu") were going through the same detox process that happens EVERY year, when natural vitamin D levels are low (Winter). It was simply called "covid" instead of "flu."

Watch the video again. The scientists found no covid, but were told by CDC to call it covid anyway. THERE is your answer.

Everybody ELSE who was a "Covid case" (meaning, a false positive of a fake PCR test) but were NOT sick, were simply declared to be a "Covid case" due to the false positive. It was a POLITICAL diagnosis, and NOT a medical diagnosis.

EVERY bit of it is a scam. That goes for the non-existent variants, too.

This is why more than 100 labs and government institutions around the world, via FOIA type requests, (a) have NEVER provided a sample of the "virus," (b) have stated ON THE RECORD that they cannot identify ANY lab in the world that has a sample of the "virus," and (c) has NO paper in their possession that shows any experiment done anywhere in the world of any lab that has really isolated AND purified the "virus."

ALL papers that claim to have done so, are using a DIFFERENT definition of "isolate" to mean nothing more than taking a sample of bodily fluid from a single individual, and not the true definition of "isolate", which is to separate one thing from everything else.

What made the tests positive?

ALL the tests are/were fake. Both 100% false positives, and 100% false negatives.

PCR is a duplication tool, like a copy machine. It is NOT a diagnostic tool. It cannot tell you if the thing being replicated can or did make you sick.

MOST "Covid positives" are nothing more than a false positive of a fake test. MOST of those people did NOT have any symptoms of sickness -- because they were not sick.

The genetic material being looked at is the person's own genetic material and/or other assorted genetic material used in the fake process that is used for evaluatoin. The computer model used to generate the so-called genetic sequence is also fake, and nothing more than a guess by the computer programmer.

what exactly made people sick

Same thing that happens EVERY year. The flu statistics went down to almost zero in 2020. Those people who DID show symptoms of sickness ("flu") were going through the same detox process that happens EVERY year, when natural vitamin D levels are low (Winter).

Everybody ELSE who was a "Covid case" (meaning, a false positive of a fake PCR test) were NOT sick, but declared to be so due to the false positive.

EVERY bit of it is a scam. That goes for the non-existent variants, too.

This is why more than 100 labs and government institutions around the world, via FOIA type requests, (a) have NEVER provided a sample of the "virus," (b) have stated ON THE RECORD that they cannot identify ANY lab in the world that has a sample of the "virus," and (c) has NO paper in their possession that shows any experiment done anywhere in the world of any lab that has really isolated AND purified the "virus."

ALL papers that claim to have done so, are using a DIFFERENT definition of "isolate" to mean nothing more than taking a sample of bodily fluid from a single individual, and not the true definition of "isolate", which is to separate one thing from everything else.