Here's another hypothesis you should consider. And since there is little evidence to suggest otherwise, we are making educated guesses (erg, hypothesizing).
Let's broaden the scope of Intelligence agencies to which this information could have originated and let's consider 5-Eyes. Are we to believe white hats are confined to the United States only? My belief is the answer is -- No. Could there be WH involved in 5-Eyes? It's plausible this may be true. Since 5-Eyes share Intel and we have already seen how the black hats like John Clapper and others used 5-Eyes as a legal loop hole to spy on Americans for the Obama Administration, it is very possible that Gregg Phillips' connections could have come from WH sources external to the United States.
What did Greg Phillips mean by stating this:
“…We participated in the op. We were part of the op. We were in communication with the target at the behest of the government. We, we were involved deeply in this, in this CI op. I think what’s going to frighten people when they understand the gravity of what it is we’re telling them, and then when we tell them that, in the end, we were betrayed by the United States government, and they turned it on us, and went and told the enemy that it was us that did it. That it was our fault. AND THAT WE HAD PENETRATED THEIR SYSTEMS.”
This sounds like the standard political damage control that we are already familiar with when Seth Rich released to the world the DNC records. The immediate response was the information was "hacked" by Guccifer 2.0 and Russia. The wording Phillips uses are in the past tense. I think this is key to understanding what Phillips is referring to. It is something that has already occurred. Even if it was a future scenario, why wouldn't Greg Phillips not be prescient enough to see the same political response as with Seth Rich? I believe this is what Greg Phillips is referring to. The NSA will always use plausible deniability to maintain an arms distance from being entangled in political theater.
I tend to believe Greg Phillips is acting as a figurehead. The 'goods' are not in his hands and may never have. Evidently from the devastating revelations already publicized (i.e. 2000 Mules), Phillips has maintained his personal protection. Is someone protecting him and TTV? Most likely. Is there a contingency plan if Phillips is somehow removed? Most likely. Q said -- 'Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.'
Here's another hypothesis you should consider. And since there is little evidence to suggest otherwise, we are making educated guesses (erg, hypothesizing).
Let's broaden the scope of Intelligence agencies to which this information could have originated and let's consider 5-Eyes. Are we to believe white hats are confined to the United States only? My belief is the answer is -- No. Could there be WH involved in 5-Eyes? It's plausible this may be true. Since 5-Eyes share Intel and we have already seen how the black hats like John Clapper and others used 5-Eyes as a legal loop hole to spy on Americans, it is very possible that Gregg Phillips' connections could have come from WH sources external to the United States.
What did Greg Phillips mean by stating this:
“…We participated in the op. We were part of the op. We were in communication with the target at the behest of the government. We, we were involved deeply in this, in this CI op. I think what’s going to frighten people when they understand the gravity of what it is we’re telling them, and then when we tell them that, in the end, we were betrayed by the United States government, and they turned it on us, and went and told the enemy that it was us that did it. That it was our fault. AND THAT WE HAD PENETRATED THEIR SYSTEMS.”
This sounds like the standard political damage control that we are already familiar with when Seth Rich released to the world the DNC records. The immediate response was the information was "hacked" by Guccifer 2.0 and Russia. The wording Phillips uses are in the past tense. I think this is key to understanding what Phillips is referring to. It is something that has already occurred. Even if it was a future scenario, why wouldn't Greg Phillips not be prescient enough to see the same political response as with Seth Rich? I believe this is what Greg Phillips is referring to. The NSA will always use plausible deniability to maintain an arms distance from being entangled in political theater.
I tend to believe Greg Phillips is acting as a figurehead. The 'goods' are not in his hands and may never have. Evidently from the devastating revelations already publicized (i.e. 2000 Mules), Phillips has maintained his personal protection. Is someone protecting him and TTV? Most likely. Is there a contingency plan if Phillips is somehow removed? Most likely. Q said -- 'Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.'
Here's another hypothesis you should consider. And since there is little evidence to suggest otherwise, we are making educated guesses (erg, hypothesizing).
Let's broaden the scope of Intelligence agencies to which this information could have originated and let's consider 5-Eyes. Are we to believe white hats are confined to the United States only? My belief is the answer is -- No. Could there be WH involved in 5-Eyes? It's plausible this may be true. Since 5-Eyes share Intel and we have already seen how the black hats like John Clapper and others used 5-Eyes as a legal loop hole to spy on Americans, it is very possible that Gregg Phillips' connections could have come from WH sources external to the United States.
What did Greg Phillips mean by stating this:
“…We participated in the op. We were part of the op. We were in communication with the target at the behest of the government. We, we were involved deeply in this, in this CI op. I think what’s going to frighten people when they understand the gravity of what it is we’re telling them, and then when we tell them that, in the end, we were betrayed by the United States government, and they turned it on us, and went and told the enemy that it was us that did it. That it was our fault. AND THAT WE HAD PENETRATED THEIR SYSTEMS.”
This sounds like the standard political damage control that we are already familiar with when Seth Rich released to the world the DNC records. The immediate response was the information was "hacked" by Guccifer 2.0 and Russia. So why wouldn't Greg Phillips not be prescient enough to see the same here? The NSA will always use plausible deniability to maintain an arms distance from being entangled in political theater.
I tend to believe Greg Phillips is acting as a figurehead. The 'goods' are not in his hands and may never have. Evidently from the devastating revelations already publicized (i.e. 2000 Mules), Phillips has maintained his personal protection. Is someone protecting him and TTV? Most likely. Is there a contingency plan if Phillips is somehow removed? Most likely. Q said -- 'Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.'