Sounds like you should write a post on this.

Not sure of the significance of Jonah and King Arthur in this context. Jonah is in the belly of the whale, which in the Aramaic seems interchangeable with "large fish". King Arthur is related to the Fisher King. All of it inside the Age of Pisces. Is this what you mean?

Tao does have the idea of Yin and Yang, but neither are presented as EVIL, so perhaps that might be why the Tao "gets a pass". Hindu has so many gods and permutations that I doubt even they can keep it all straight, let alone me. But in any case, I feel that their "Good v Evil" is actually not really there, and is instead a three-way affair, with Create (Brahma). Preserve (Vishnu), and Destroy (Shiva). And their "Destroy" is not "to lay waste". It is more like "Destroy, to Build", as what God told Jeremiah to do.

"See, today I appoint you over nations and kingdoms to uproot and tear down, to destroy and overthrow, to build and to plant.”

No EVIL, there. At least to my eye.

Sounds like you should write a post on this.

Not sure of the significance of Jonah and King Arthur. Jonah is in the belly of the whale, which in the Aramaic seems interchangeable with "large fish". King Arthur is related to the Fisher King. All of it inside the Age of Pisces. Is this what you mean?

Tao does have the idea of Yin and Yang, but neither are presented as EVIL, so perhaps that might be why the Tao "gets a pass". Hindu has so many gods and permutations that I doubt even they can keep it all straight, let alone me. But in any case, I feel that their "Good v Evil" is actually not really there, and is instead a three-way affair, with Create (Brahma). Preserve (Vishnu), and Destroy (Shiva). And their "Destroy" is not "to lay waste". It is more like "Destroy, to Build", as what God told Jeremiah to do.

"See, today I appoint you over nations and kingdoms to uproot and tear down, to destroy and overthrow, to build and to plant.”

No EVIL, there. At least to my eye.