I also think the initial jab damages any cognition the person has left.

It puts them in denial.

I have a well know statistician friend (from years ago).

She is pushing the limits of statistical manipulation to maintain her denial.

It is sad to see.

One of the catch phrases is "double-bind-peer-reviewed" --- then "double-bind-peer-reviewed-PUBLISHED" --- then "double-bind-peer-reviewed-PUBLISHED" by some hand picked publisher.

Other catch phrases, "anecdotal evidence", " that's only an observational study"....

No dear -- we don't need a peer-reviewed study to know that IT'S RAINING OUTSIDE.

THE DEFORMED BABIES' MOMS WERE TAKING Thalidomide.

I also think the initial jab damages any cognition the person has left.

I puts them in denial.

I have a well know statistician friend (from years ago).

She is pushing the limits of statistical manipulation to maintain her denial.

It is sad to see.

One of the catch phrases is "double-bind-peer-reviewed" --- then "double-bind-peer-reviewed-PUBLISHED" --- then "double-bind-peer-reviewed-PUBLISHED" by some hand picked publisher.

Other catch phrases, "anecdotal evidence", " that's only an observational study"....

No dear -- we don't need a peer-reviewed study to know that IT'S RAINING OUTSIDE.

THE DEFORMED BABIES' MOMS WERE TAKING Thalidomide.

I also think the initial jab damages any cognition the person has left.

I puts them in denial.

I have a well know statistician friend (from years ago).

She is pushing the limits of statistical manipulation to maintain her denial.

It is sad to see.

One of the catch phrases is "double-bind-peer-reviewed" --- then "double-bind-peer-reviewed-PUBLISHED" --- then "double-bind-peer-reviewed-PUBLISHED" by some hand picked publisher.

Other catch phrases, "anecdotal evidence", " that's only an observational study"....

No dear -- we don't need a peer-reviewed study to know that IT'S RAINING OUTSIDE.