I am going to do the Cain study in parts. I hope you don't mind that I post it here.

Part I

Thank you for your courteous answers.

I have the Biblical documentation of each tribe and the signs of the Zodiac corresponding to each, also the stones in the breast plate (what we call birthstones nowadays). The Bible truly is written in the stars and the standard of each tribe pointed to that story. A story for the whole world to see.

Now for the story of Cain.

Cain and Able are not in Adam's genealogy, Genesis chapter 5. Able being murdered produced no offspring-the murder of Able also killed his generations-that is why Able's "blood" (denoting posterity) cried out from the ground.

Cain had offspring but neither he, his offspring, or their deaths are mentioned in the genealogy of Adam.

There is a bifurcation in the family "tree".

In the Bible we are told who Cain was and who his father was:

1Jn 3:12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.

Like any verse in the Bible, you can try to spiritualize this one, and claim that it only means Cain was a follower of Satan.

But the word “of” (i.e., “of that wicked one”) in this verse destroys that premise. It’s not the usual word translated “of” in the New Testament. Instead, it’s translated from the Greek word ek, which is genitive of origin (meaning it relates to the actual physical origin or source of a thing). The word itself means “out from the interior of.” In other words, Cain was “of” (i.e., out from the interior of) that wicked one, who, of course, is the devil.

We know the story of the "shining one" in the garden and how Eve was seduced. At least we thought we did.

Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Subtil-crafty and cunning.

You’ll note the serpent asks Eve a simplistic question about eating from the trees in the garden. Of course, these would be fruit trees. But are we really talking about trees here?

Remember the various symbolisms in the parable of the tares, for example, how the wheat and the tares represented two different plantings of people?

And do you remember how, in Isaiah 61:3, our heavenly Father called His People “trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord”?

Trees (people/beings)

I am going to do the Cain study in parts. I hope you don't mind that I post it here.

Part I

Thank you for your courteous answers.

I have the Biblical documentation of each tribe and the signs of the Zodiac corresponding to each, also the stones in the breast plate (what we call birthstones nowadays). The Bible truly is written in the stars and the standard of each tribe pointed to that story. A story for the whole world to see.

Now for the story of Cain.

Cain and Able are not in Adam's genealogy, Genesis chapter 5. Able being murdered produced no offspring-the murder of Able also killed his generations-that is why Able's "blood" (denoting posterity) cried out from the ground.

Cain had offspring but neither he, his offspring, or their deaths are mentioned in the genealogy of Adam.

There is a bifurcation in the family "tree".

In the Bible we are told who Cain was and who his father was:

1Jn 3:12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.

Like any verse in the Bible, you can try to spiritualize this one, and claim that it only means Cain was a follower of Satan.

But the word “of” (i.e., “of that wicked one”) in this verse destroys that premise. It’s not the usual word translated “of” in the New Testament. Instead, it’s translated from the Greek word ek, which is genitive of origin (meaning it relates to the actual physical origin or source of a thing). The word itself means “out from the interior of.” In other words, Cain was “of” (i.e., out from the interior of) that wicked one, who, of course, is the devil.

We know the story of the "shining one" in the garden and how Eve was seduced. At least we thought we did.

Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Subtil-crafty and cunning.

You’ll note the serpent asks Eve a simplistic question about eating from the trees in the garden. Of course, these would be fruit trees. But are we really talking about trees here?

Remember the various symbolisms in the parable of the tares, for example, how the wheat and the tares represented two different plantings of people?

And do you remember how, in Isaiah 61:3, our heavenly Father called His People “trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord”?

Trees (people/beings)

I am going to do the Cain study in parts. I hope you don't mind that I post it here.

Part I

Thank you for your courteous answers.

I have the Biblical documentation of each tribe and the signs of the Zodiac corresponding to each, also the stones in the breast plate (what we call birthstones nowadays). The Bible truly is written in the stars and the standard of each tribe pointed to that story. A story for the whole world to see.

Now for the story of Cain. Cain and Able are not in Adam's genealogy, Genesis chapter 5. Able being murdered produced no offspring-the murder of Able also killed his generations-that is why Able's "blood" (denoting posterity) cried out from the ground. Cain had offspring but neither he, his offspring, or their deaths are mentioned in the genealogy of Adam.

There is a bifurcation in the family "tree".
In the Bible we are told who Cain was and who his father was: 1Jn 3:12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.

Like any verse in the Bible, you can try to spiritualize this one, and claim that it only means Cain was a follower of Satan.

But the word “of” (i.e., “of that wicked one”) in this verse destroys that premise. It’s not the usual word translated “of” in the New Testament. Instead, it’s translated from the Greek word ek, which is genitive of origin (meaning it relates to the actual physical origin or source of a thing). The word itself means “out from the interior of.” In other words, Cain was “of” (i.e., out from the interior of) that wicked one, who, of course, is the devil.

We know the story of the "shining one" in the garden and how Eve was seduced. At least we thought we did.
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Subtil-crafty and cunning.

You’ll note the serpent asks Eve a simplistic question about eating from the trees in the garden. Of course, these would be fruit trees. But are we really talking about trees here? Remember the various symbolisms in the parable of the tares, for example, how the wheat and the tares represented two different plantings of people? And do you remember how, in Isaiah 61:3, our heavenly Father called His People “trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord”?

I am going to do the Cain study in parts. I hope you don't mind that I post it here.

Part I

Thank you for your courteous answers.

I have the Biblical documentation of each tribe and the signs of the Zodiac corresponding to each, also the stones in the breast plate (what we call birthstones nowadays). The Bible truly is written in the stars and the standard of each tribe pointed to that story. A story for the whole world to see.

Now for the story of Cain. Cain and Able are not in Adam's genealogy, Genesis chapter 5. Able being murdered produced no offspring-the murder of Able also killed his generations-that is why Able's "blood" (denoting posterity) cried out from the ground. Cain had offspring but neither he, his offspring, or their deaths are mentioned in the genealogy of Adam.

There is a bifurcation in the family "tree".
In the Bible we are told who Cain was and who his father was: 1Jn 3:12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.

Like any verse in the Bible, you can try to spiritualize this one, and claim that it only means Cain was a follower of Satan.

But the word “of” (i.e., “of that wicked one”) in this verse destroys that premise. It’s not the usual word translated “of” in the New Testament. Instead, it’s translated from the Greek word ek, which is genitive of origin (meaning it relates to the actual physical origin or source of a thing). The word itself means “out from the interior of.” In other words, Cain was “of” (i.e., out from the interior of) that wicked one, who, of course, is the devil.

We know the story of the "shining one" in the garden and how Eve was seduced. At least we thought we did.
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Subtil-crafty and cunning.
You’ll note the serpent asks Eve a simplistic question about eating from the trees in the garden. Of course, these would be fruit trees. But are we really talking about trees here? Remember the various symbolisms in the parable of the tares, for example, how the wheat and the tares represented two different plantings of people? And do you remember how, in Isaiah 61:3, our heavenly Father called His People “trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord”?