I do not think Tartaria is involved in America. I have seen insufficient reasonable evidence that supports that assertion. I don't think the architecture attributed to Tartary (in America) is Tartarian. The assumption is that the people of that period couldn't have, or wouldn't have been motivated to build those things. I don't think that is true. I think they very well could have, and were motivated to do so. I suggest AEWAR's channel, especially his work the past couple months, that support those statements. He presents very good arguments/evidence. He is a former "American Tartaria" investigator that has taken a new turn in his research. His new research is more in alignment with what I have found by digging a little deeper than most "Tartarian truthers" go, and it looks like he is headed towards the Roman Catholic Church and the freemasons as the motivators and creators of 18th and 19th century American (believed to be Tartarian) architecture.
One of the biggest protests I have with the Tartarian narrative is the belief that they died out in the 19th century and were part of America at that time. While I think it's true that they were largely diminished by the 19th century, I think their final demise was in the 20th century, which I will show evidence for. I think they had substantially shrunk in the early 18th century, all but wiped out by that time (compared to their former glory), and would almost certainly not have possibly been any part of "America" in the 18th or 19th centuries, no matter what else may be true about their involvement here.
I do not think Tartaria is involved in America. I have seen insufficient reasonable evidence that supports that assertion. I don't think the architecture attributed to Tartary (in America) is Tartarian. The assumption is that the people of that period couldn't have, or wouldn't have been motivated to build those things. I don't think that is true. I think they very well could have, and were motivated to do so. I suggest AEWAR's channel, especially his work the past couple months, that support those statements. He presents very good arguments/evidence. He is a former "American Tartaria" investigator that has taken a new turn in his research. His new research is more in alignment with what I have found by digging a little deeper than most "Tartarian truthers" go, and it looks like he is headed towards the Roman Catholic Church and the freemasons as the motivators and creators of 18th and 19th century American (believed to be Tartarian) architecture.
One of the biggest protests I have with the Tartarian narrative is the belief that they died out in the 19th century and were part of America at that time. While I think it's true that they were largely diminished by the 19th century, I think their final demise was in the 20th century, which I will show evidence for. I think they had substantially shrunk in the early 18th century, all but wiped out by that time, and would almost certainly not have possibly been any part of "America" in the 18th or 19th centuries, no matter what else may be true about their involvement here.
I do not think Tartaria is involved in America. I have seen insufficient reasonable evidence that supports that assertion. I don't think the architecture attributed to Tartary (in America) is Tartarian. The assumption is that the people of that period couldn't have, or wouldn't have been motivated to build those things. I don't think that is true. I think they very well could have, and were motivated to do so. I suggest AEWAR's channel, especially his work the past couple months, that support those statements. He presents very good arguments/evidence. He is a former "American Tartaria" investigator that has taken a new turn in his research. His new research is more in alignment with what I have found by digging a little deeper than most "Tartarian truthers" go, and it looks like he is headed towards the Roman Catholic Church and the freemasons as the motivators and creators of 18th and 19th century American (believed to be Tartarian) architecture.
One of the biggest protests I have with the Tartarian narrative is the belief that they died out in the 19th century and were part of America at that time. While I think it's true that they were largely diminished by the 19th century, I think their final demise was in the 20th century, which I will show evidence for. I think they had substantially shrunk in the early 18th century, all by defeated by that time, and would almost certainly not have possibly been any part of "America" in the 18th or 19th centuries, no matter what else may be true about their involvement here.
I do not think Tartaria is involved in America. I have seen insufficient reasonable evidence that supports that assertion. I don't think the architecture attributed to Tartary (in America) is Tartarian. The assumption is that the people of that period couldn't have, or wouldn't have been motivated to build those things. I don't think that is true. I think they very well could have, and were motivated to do so. I suggest AEWAR's channel, especially his work the past couple months, that support those statements. He presents very good arguments/evidence. He is a former "American Tartaria" investigator that has taken a new turn in his research. His new research is more in alignment with what I have found by digging a little deeper than most "Tartarian truthers" go, and it looks like he is headed towards the Roman Catholic Church and the freemasons as the motivators and creators of 18th and 19th century American (believed to be Tartarian) architecture.
One of the biggest protests I have with the Tartarian narrative is the belief that they died out in the 19th century. While I think that's true, and in fact I think their final demise was in the 20th century, I think they had substantially shrunk in the early 18th century, all by defeated by that time.