I’m quite familiar with him, let me assure you. So both you and I are familiar with the author, but only I am familiar with the book. Yet you feel so confident telling me the book is bad. You think you actually ‘know’ the book is bad. As I said, you’re like a leftist who won’t watch a Trump speech. The funny thing is, it’s the very content of the book that would address that problem. But please don’t think I’m trying to persuade you to read it. I only want you to recognise one thing: that your refusal to read it is analogous to a leftist refusing to look at a Trump speech. You ‘know’ it’s bad without honestly knowing anything about it.

I’m quite familiar with him, let me assure you. So both you and I are familiar with the author, but only I am familiar with the book. Yet you feel so confident telling me the book is bad. You think you actually ‘know’ the book is bad. As I said, you’re like a leftist who won’t watch a Trump speech. The funny thing is, it’s the very content of the book that would address that problem. But please don’t think I’m trying to persuade you to read it. I only want you to recognise one thing: that your refusal to read it is analogous to a leftist refusing to look at a Trump supporter. You ‘know’ it’s bad without honestly knowing anything about it.

I’m quite familiar with him, let me assure you. So both you and I are familiar with the author, but only I am familiar with the book. Yet you feel so confident telling me the book is bad. You think you actually ‘know’ the book is bad. As I said, you’re like a leftist who won’t watch a Trump speech. The funny thing is, it’s the very content of the book that would address that problem.