There's a lot to unpack here and much of it is wrong.
Martin Luther has absolutely nothing to do with the King James Version, for starters. Luther translated the Latin Vulgate into German because he did not know Greek or Hebrew.
Secondly, the King James Version contained all 15 books of the Apocrypha in 1611.
Thirdly, the Roman Catholic Church claims it is descended from the apostles and that Peter was the first Pope.
The insider elites even claim to the profane the Pope sits on a throne marked by an upside down cross because Peter was crucified upside down.
Concerning the manner of Peter's death, we possess a tradition—attested to by Tertullian at the end of the second century (see above) and by Origen (in Eusebius, " Hist. Eccl.", II, i)—that he suffered crucifixion. Origen says: "Peter was crucified at Rome with his head downwards, as he himself had desired to suffer".
https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/st-peter-prince-of-the-apostles-5142
Rather than answer my four questions about the Holy Spirit working through the Roman Catholic Church, you instead ranted about Pope Francis being unable to make changes to the dogma and attributed that to the Holy Spirit protecting the Roman Catholic Church from error.
Are you claiming Pope Francis is unable to speak ex cathedra and set any dogma he so desires? And if he did so, would you remain a Roman Catholic? In fact, you're a heretic according to the Council of Trent if you dare to question Pope Francis's authority.
What about the Pope's endorsement of the mRNA vaccines? Shouldn't that be enough to question what the hell is going on?
Maybe your position is that Francis is an antipope, which means you're a sedevacantist? If so, I congratulate you in taking the first step out of Babylon.
Why did the Roman Catholic Church remove the Book of Enoch? That's the question you should be asking.
There's a lot to unpack here and much of it is wrong.
Martin Luther has absolutely nothing to do with the King James Version, for starters. Luther translated the Latin Vulgate into German because he did not know Greek or Hebrew.
Secondly, the King James Version contained all 15 books of the Apocrypha in 1611.
Thirdly, the Roman Catholic Church claims it is descended from the apostles and that Peter was the first Pope.
The insider elites even claim to the profane the Pope sits on a throne marked by an upside down cross because Peter was crucified upside down.
Concerning the manner of Peter's death, we possess a tradition—attested to by Tertullian at the end of the second century (see above) and by Origen (in Eusebius, " Hist. Eccl.", II, i)—that he suffered crucifixion. Origen says: "Peter was crucified at Rome with his head downwards, as he himself had desired to suffer".
https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/st-peter-prince-of-the-apostles-5142
Instead, you ranted about Pope Francis being unable to make changes to the dogma and attributed that to the Holy Spirit protecting the Roman Catholic Church from error.
Are you claiming Pope Francis is unable to speak ex cathedra and set any dogma he so desires? And if he did so, would you remain a Roman Catholic? In fact, you're a heretic according to the Council of Trent if you dare to question Pope Francis's authority.
What about the Pope's endorsement of the mRNA vaccines? Shouldn't that be enough?
Why did the Roman Catholic Church remove the Book of Enoch? That's the question you should be asking.