Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I clearly outline 150 years of ecliscal war between The Holy Roman Catholic Church & Masons. Anything that happened Post Pius XII is not surprising, considering that Masons took over - that would include all Popes from 1958 & beyond (Except the one that died 33 days into his Papacy in 1978, he may have been a honest reformer). We have had endure Masonic imposters since 1958.

I outlined earlier that I believe the Satanic Tudors, Martin Luther & Rosecrutian Gnostic order may have colluded during the 15th to undermine the Homogeny of Christiondom - they all stood to benefit from Weakening Christian Rome by breaking the religion up. Similar to how the Russian Orthodox Monarchy endured the Liberal Communist revolution in 1917, I believe the same Hiegalian dialectic was used by Gnostic agent Martin Luther, to perform his rebellious act on October 17th, 1517. The Media at the time, (the printing press) was part of his multi-pronged attack against the Holy Roman Empire. Contrary to what Protestants say, the lay people did have access to read the Gospels in 1517. However back then, most agrarian peasants did not know how to read their own language, much less Latin & Greek. It was the Catholic Church’s duty to protect the sacred scriptures from heresy & corruption. Luther translating the Bible, he weakened, Christianity & the fruit of his rebellion has led to some dozen different watered down version of the Bibles. Luther is the father of heresy & the 4,000 different Protestant denominations his rebellion birthed has caused confusion & possible damnation of millions & millions of souls outside of the original church that Jesus & the Apostles founded. Luther’s actions led to civil war, it diluted the Bible & convoluted the faith.

He proposed editing & re-organizing it (wait, who assembled the Bible? That’s right the Holy Catholic Church). Luther broke his vows as a Priest, married a nun & took it upon himself to create a new religion - how can anyone look up to that rebellion? That is the cold, Harsh truth. If he WAS a Gnostic as his crest indicates, the man is likely burning in HELL.

Thanks for letting me get that off my chest, that was fun!

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I clearly outline 150 years of ecliscal war between The Holy Roman Catholic Church & Masons. Anything that happened Post Pius XII is not surprising, considering that Masons took over - that would include all Popes from 1958 & beyond (Except the one that died 33 days into his Papacy in 1978, he may have been a honest reformer). We have had endure Masonic imposters since 1958.

I outlined earlier that I believe the Satanic Tudors, Martin Luther & Rosecrutian Gnostic order may have colluded during the 15th to undermine the Homogeny of Christiondom - they all stood to benefit from Weakening Christian Rome by breaking the religion up. Similar to how the Russian Orthodox Monarchy endured the Liberal Communist revolution in 1917, I believe the same Hiegalian dialectic was used by Gnostic agent Martin Luther, to perform his rebellious act on October 17th, 1517. The Media at the time, (the printing press) was part of his multi-pronged approach against the Holy Roman Empire. Contrary to what Protestants say, lay people did have access to read the Gospels in 1517, but most did not know how to read Latin & Greek. The Catholic Church considered its duty to protect the sacred scriptures from protect from heresy & corruption. By Luther translating the Bible, he weakened, Christianity & some dozen different watered down version of the Bible have been produced. Luther is the father of heresy & the 4,000 different Protestant denominations has only caused confusion & possible damnation of souls. Luther diluted the Bible & convoluted the faith. He proposed editing & re-organizing it (wait, who assembled the Bible? That’s right the Holy Catholic Church). Luther broke his vows as a Priest, married a nun & took it upon himself to create a new religion - how can anyone look up to that rebellion?

That is the cold, Harsh truth. If he WAS a Gnostic as his crest indicates, the man is likely burning in HELL. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest, that was fun!

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I clearly outline 150 years of ecliscal war between The Holy Roman Catholic Church & Masons. Anything that happened Post Pius XII is not surprising, considering that Masons took over - that would include all Popes from 1958 & beyond (Except the one that died 33 days into his Papacy in 1978, he may have been a honest reformer). We have had endure Masonic imposters since 1958.

I outlined earlier that I believe the Satanic Tudors, Martin Luther & Rosecrutian Gnostic order may have colluded during the 15th to undermine the Homogeny of Christiondom - they all stood to benefit from Weakening Christian Rome by breaking the religion up. Similar to how the Russian Orthodox Monarchy endured the Liberal Communist revolution in 1917, I believe the same Hiegalian dialectic was used my Gnostic agent Martin Luther, to perform his rebellious act on October 17th, 1517. The Media at the time, (the printing press) was part of his multi-pronged approach against the Holy Roman Empire. Contrary to what Protestants say, lay people did have access to read the Gospels in 1517, but most did not know how to read Latin & Greek. The Catholic Church considered its duty to protect the sacred scriptures from protect from heresy & corruption. By Luther translating the Bible, he weakened, Christianity & some dozen different watered down version of the Bible have been produced. Luther is the father of heresy & the 4,000 different Protestant denominations has only caused confusion & possible damnation of souls. Luther diluted the Bible & convoluted the faith. He proposed editing & re-organizing it (wait, who assembled the Bible? That’s right the Holy Catholic Church). Luther broke his vows as a Priest, married a nun & took it upon himself to create a new religion - how can anyone look up to that rebellion?

That is the cold, Harsh truth. If he WAS a Gnostic as his crest indicates, the man is likely burning in HELL. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest, that was fun!

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I clearly outline 150 years of ecliscal war between The Holy Roman Catholic Church & Masons. Anything that happened Post Pius XII is not surprising, considering that Masons took over - that would include all Popes from 1958 & beyond (Except the one that died 33 days into his Papacy in 1978, he may have been a reformer). He have had imposters since 1958.

I outlined earlier that I believe the Tudors, Luther & Rosecrutian Gnostic order may have colluded in the 15th to undermine the Homogeny of Christiondom. Like Russia had suffered the Liberal Communist revolution in 1917, I believe the same Hiegalian dialectic was used my Gnostic agent Martin Luther, to perform his act. Media (the printing press) was part of his pronged approach. People did have access to read the Gospels in 1517, but most did not know how to read Latin & Greek. The Catholic Church considered its duty to protect the sacred scriptures from corruption. By Luther translating it , he didn’t do Christianity (he’s the father of heresy & 4,000 different Protestant denominations) he diluted the Bible & convoluted the faith. He proposed editing & re-organizing it (wait, who assembled the Bible? That’s right the Holy Catholic Church). Luther broke his vows as a Priesr, married a nun & took it upon himself to create a new religion (how can anyone look up to that?). That is the cold. Harsh truth. If he WAS a Gnostic as his crest indicates, the man is likely burning in HELL.

Thanks for letting me get that off my chest, that was fun!

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I clearly outline 150 years of ecliscal war between The Holy Roman Catholic Church & Masons. Anything that happened Post Pius XII is not surprising, considering that Masons took over - that would include all Popes from 1958 & beyond (Except the one that died 33 days into his Papacy in 1978, he may have been a reformer). He have had imposters since 1958.

I outlined earlier that I believe the Tudors, Luther & Rosecrutian Gnostic order may have colluded in the 15th to undermine the Homogeny of Christiondom. Like Russia had suffered the Liberal Communist revolution in 1917, I believe the same Hiegalian dialectic was used my Gnostic agent Martin Luther, to perform his act. Media (the printing press) was part of his pronged approach. People did have access to read the gods oils in 1517, but most did not know Latin & Greek. The Catholic Church considered its duty to protect the sacred scriptures from corruption. By Luther translating it , he didn’t do Christianity, he diluted the Bible. He proposed editing & re-organizing it (wait, who assembled the Bible? That’s right the Holy Catholic Church). Luther broke his vows, married a nun & took it upon himself to create a new religion. That is the cold. Harsh truth. If he WAS a Gnostic as his crest indicates, the man is likely burning in HELL.

Thanks for letting me get that off my chest, that was fun!

2 years ago
1 score