OK ... let's see how much you understand.

Go to "Materials and Methods."

A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used

Do you know what that means? Explain.

to express codon optimized versions

Do you know what that means? Explain.

of the Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2 proteins

Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"

Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?

Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.

So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know.

The nsp8L7 fusion proteins were made by adding ...

Making proteins, not studying a virus.

They are supposedly (according to you) studying RNA virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which has anything at all to do with a "virus."

RNA is in a lot of things. In this case, bacteria.

See the problem?

It is all ASSUMED to be somehow related to RNA virus -- and that ain't science.

All proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus cells (Agilent Technologies) and grown

Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.

It is studying a mixture of genetic material.

A MIXTURE.

Harvested cells were lysed [broken apart] ... using a ... microfluidizer [machine] ... in a buffer containing [chemicals] ...

So ...

They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.

E Coli is bacteria, not virus.

They claim they can CREATE something "SIMILAR TO" SARS-CoV-2 from this method.

Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.

Why jump through all these hoops? Why not just get a sample of SARS-CoV-2 virus and go from there?

Oh ... because they CAN'T. More than 100 agencies and laboratories around the world ALL have stated on the record that ... NO SUCH SAMPLE EXISTS, ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.

THAT ... is why they jump through these ridiculous hoops.

Then, they break what they have apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.

Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.

Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.

And they do it all with bacteria, no virus even included.

You are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).

In reality, it has nothing to do with the science of so-called virus.

Proteins from bacteria and other materials. So what?

You call it an "awesome paper."

It is garbage.

OK ... let's see how much you understand.

Go to "Materials and Methods."

A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used

Do you know what that means? Explain.

to express codon optimized versions

Do you know what that means? Explain.

of the Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2 proteins

Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"

Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?

Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.

So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know.

The nsp8L7 fusion proteins were made by adding ...

Making proteins, not studying a virus.

They are supposedly (according to you) studying RNA virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which has anything at all to do with a "virus."

RNA is in a lot of things. In this case, bacteria.

See the problem?

It is all ASSUMED to be somehow related to RNA virus -- and that ain't science.

All proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus cells (Agilent Technologies) and grown

Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.

It is studying a mixture of genetic material.

A MIXTURE.

Harvested cells were lysed [broken apart] ... using a ... microfluidizer [machine] ... in a buffer containing [chemicals] ...

So ...

They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.

E Coli is bacteria, not virus.

They claim they can CREATE something SIMILAR TO SARS-CoV-2 from this method.

Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.

Then, they break it apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.

Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.

Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.

And they do it all with bacteria, no virus even included.

You are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).

In reality, it has nothing to do with the science of so-called virus.

Proteins from bacteria and other materials. So what?

You call it an "awesome paper."

It is garbage.

OK ... let's see how much you understand.

Go to "Materials and Methods."

A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used

Do you know what that means? Explain.

to express codon optimized versions

Do you know what that means? Explain.

of the Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2 proteins

Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"

Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?

Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.

So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know.

The nsp8L7 fusion proteins were made by adding ...

Making proteins, not studying a virus.

They are supposedly studying a virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which is KNOWN to be a "virus."

See the problem?

It is all ASSUMED -- and that ain't science.

All proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus cells (Agilent Technologies) and grown

Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.

It is studying a mixture of genetic material.

A MIXTURE.

Harvested cells were lysed [broken apart] ... using a ... microfluidizer [machine] ... in a buffer containing [chemicals] ...

So ...

They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.

E Coli is bacteria, not virus.

They claim they can CREATE something SIMILAR TO SARS-CoV-2 from this method.

Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.

Then, they break it apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.

Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.

Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.

And they do it all with bacteria, no virus even included.

You are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).

In reality, it has nothing to do with the science of so-called virus.

Proteins from bacteria and other materials. So what?

You call it an "awesome paper."

It is garbage.

OK ... let's see how much you understand.

Go to "Materials and Methods."

A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used

Do you know what that means? Explain.

to express codon optimized versions

Do you know what that means? Explain.

of the Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2 proteins

Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"

Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?

Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.

So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know. And since they are claiming "viral proteins" the question is ... HOW DO THEY KNOW THIS?

The nsp8L7 fusion proteins were made by adding ...

Making proteins, not studying a virus.

They are supposedly studying a virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which is KNOWN to be a "virus."

See the problem?

It is all ASSUMED -- and that ain't science.

All proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus cells (Agilent Technologies) and grown

Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.

It is studying a mixture of genetic material.

A MIXTURE.

Harvested cells were lysed [broken apart] ... using a ... microfluidizer [machine] ... in a buffer containing [chemicals] ...

So ...

They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.

E Coli is bacteria, not virus.

They claim they can CREATE something SIMILAR TO SARS-CoV-2 from this method.

Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.

Then, they break it apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.

Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.

Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.

And they do it all with bacteria, no virus even included.

You are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).

In reality, it has nothing to do with the science of so-called virus.

Proteins from bacteria and other materials. So what?

You call it an "awesome paper."

It is garbage.

OK ... let's see how much you understand.

Go to "Materials and Methods."

A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used

Do you know what that means? Explain.

to express codon optimized versions

Do you know what that means? Explain.

of the Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2 proteins

Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"

Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?

Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.

So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know. And since they are claiming "viral proteins" the question is ... HOW DO THEY KNOW THIS?

The nsp8L7 fusion proteins were made by adding ...

Making proteins, not studying a virus.

They are supposedly studying a virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which is KNOWN to be a "virus."

See the problem?

It is all ASSUMED -- and that ain't science.

All proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus cells (Agilent Technologies) and grown

Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.

It is studying a mixture of genetic material.

A MIXTURE.

Harvested cells were lysed [broken apart] ... using a ... microfluidizer [machine] ... in a buffer containing [chemicals] ...

So ...

They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.

E Coli is bacteria, not virus.

They claim they can CREATE something SIMILAR TO SARS-CoV-2 from this method.

Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.

Then, they break it apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.

Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.

Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.

And you are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).

In reality, it is non-science.

You call it an "awesome paper."

It is garbage.