The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data. This is called being wrong.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions are correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data. This is called being wrong.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions are correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data. This is called being wrong.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions are correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data. This is called being wrong.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions are correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data. This is called being wrong.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions are correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions/information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions/information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

In case you're unaware: anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

In case you're unaware: anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.

The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot

No, it's not. Here's another possible explanation: the article is based on faulty data, or the author is making faulty assumptions.

Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their information is correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.

Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.