Exactly. No wreckage anywhere that day. Only passports lol. Although 12 years later multiple news stories pop up about a 5 foot piece of landing gear wedged between two buildings (one’s even a mosque). If we entertain the theory that the kinetic energy carried the planes straight through those buildings surely there’d be more evidence than a rusty piece of apparent landing gear found over a decade later. Then there’s the Pennsylvania field and the Pentagon: not the tiniest scrap of plane parts to be found. Even if we entertain the theory that the nose cones contained bunker buster bombs are we meant to believe the planes simply vaporised?

Edit: I now remember they apparently found an engine not belonging to a 767.

Regardless, planes did not bring those 3 buildings down. Controlled demolition is clearly the best explanation.

Exactly. No wreckage anywhere that day. Only passports lol. Although 12 years later multiple news stories pop up about a 5 foot piece of landing gear wedged between two buildings (one’s even a mosque). If we entertain the theory that the kinetic energy carried the planes straight through those buildings surely there’d be more evidence than a rusty piece of apparent landing gear found over a decade later. Then there’s the Pennsylvania field and the Pentagon: not the tiniest scrap of plane parts to be found. Even if we entertain the theory that the nose cones contained bunker buster bombs are we meant to believe the planes simply vaporised?