I appreciate he may be afraid and that that fear may be a motive for his actions, however, being afraid is no excuse to delete information.

We live in The Matrix. While there is certainly false information around, The Matrix isn't created so much by false information, as by hidden information. I.e. it's the stuff that is memory holed that really creates our false views of the world. In addition, us being trained to trust reporting sources instead of looking for ourselves at primary sources is how the system perpetuates itself.

In other words, the whole reason we are in the place we are in is because information has been hidden, and primary sources are not sought out over an "expert" analysis of them. The credentials of the speaker is more important than the actual evidence of the argument.

While I don't think you have meant to, your posts show exactly what I mean. Instead of being able to see primary sources of data, on a data driven argument, I have received Mercola's credentials as argument as to why Mercola words (which I can't even read) are worth listening to. He is an "against the Cabal" "expert," thus his words have credence.

I just want to see the data that supports the claim, but I can't even see if the claims have data support unless I sign up, and that will never happen. This is exactly how "controlled opposition" operates. That doesn't mean Mercola is such, but it is a method that is employed for that purpose; to control "the other side."

I appreciate he may be afraid and that that fear may be a motive for his actions, however, being afraid is no excuse to delete information.

We live in The Matrix. While there is certainly false information around, The Matrix isn't created so much by false information, as by hidden information. I.e. it's the stuff that is memory holed that really creates our false views of the world. In addition, us being trained to trust reporting sources instead of looking for ourselves at primary sources is how the system perpetuates itself.

In other words, the whole reason we are in the place we are in is because information has been hidden, and primary sources are not sought out over an "expert" analysis of them. The credentials of the source is more important than the actual evidence of the argument.

While I don't think you have meant to, your posts show exactly what I mean. Instead of being able to see primary sources of data, on a data driven argument, I have received Mercola's credentials as argument as to why Mercola words (which I can't even read) are worth listening to. He is an "against the Cabal" "expert," thus his words have credence.

I just want to see the data that supports the claim, but I can't even see if the claims have data support unless I sign up, and that will never happen. This is exactly how "controlled opposition" operates. That doesn't mean Mercola is such, but it is a method that is employed for that purpose; to control "the other side."