Still following this thread by any chance?

Interesting update: I won my case.

Traffic ticket for speeding. Used general principles of Robert Fox and Richard Cornforth.

I believe I put them into a legal bind that they could not figure out how to (a) railroad me and (b) still make it "look good" in case I appealed.

So, they dismissed.

It is unfortunate that Fox did not leave a "paint by numbers" things-to-do plan of action for court cases, but I do believe he had the right general approach.

The system is corrupt. But because of that, they think they can "cut corners" and violate the law willfully and openly, while giving it a cloak of "justice" via the pomp and circumstance.

But the truth is, in most cases: The emperor has no clothes.

As Gerry Spence, the famous trial lawyer, said: "In 61 years trying cases all across the country, I never had a case where the government did not lie or cheat. Not one time!"

And THAT is their weakness. They cut corners because most attorneys are playing the "game," too and won't call them out, and most pro se/pro per litigants have no idea what to do -- or use "internet theories" that the courts can shoot down with ease.

But when you get at the heart and soul of THE LAW (as it really is, not as they are trying to make it seem, due to wanting to cut corners), then they are revealed as a paper tiger.

No time for more now, but talk later if you are interested.

Still following this thread by any chance?

Interesting update: I won my case.

Traffic ticket for speeding. Used general principles of Robert Fox and Richard Cornforth.

I believe I put them into a legal bind that they could not figure out how to (a) railroad me and (b) still make it "look good" in case I appealed.

So, they dismissed.

It is unfortunate that Fox did not leave a "paint by numbers" things-to-do plan of action for court cases, but I do believe he had the right general approach.

The system is corrupt. But because of that, they think they can "cut corners" and violate the law willfully and openly, while giving it a cloak of "justice" via the pomp and circumstance.

But the truth is, in most cases: The emperor has no clothes.

As Gerry Spence, the famous trial lawyer, said: "In 61 years trying cases all across the country, I never had a case where the government did not cheat or lie. Not one time!"

And THAT is their weakness. They cut corners because most attorneys are playing the "game," too and won't call them out, and most pro se/pro per litigants have no idea what to do -- or use "internet theories" that the courts can shoot down with ease.

But when you get at the heart and soul of THE LAW (as it really is, not as they are trying to make it seem, due to wanting to cut corners), then they are revealed as a paper tiger.

No time for more now, but talk later if you are interested.

Still following this thread by any chance?

Interesting update: I won my case.

Traffic ticket for speeding. Used general principles of Robert Fox and Richard Cornforth.

I believe I put them into a legal bind that they could not figure out how to (a) railroad me and (b) still make it "look good" in case I appealed.

So, they dismissed.

It is unfortunate that Fox did not leave a "paint by numbers" things-to-do plan of action for court cases, but I do believe he had the right general approach.

The system is corrupt. But because of that, they think they can "cut corners" and violate the law willfully and openly, while giving it a cloak of "justice" via the pomp and circumstance.

But the truth is, in most cases: The emperor has no clothes.

As Gerry Spence, the famous trial lawyer, said: "In 61 years trying cases all across the country, I have never had a case where the government did not cheat or lie. Not one time!"

And THAT is their weakness. They cut corners because most attorneys are playing the "game," too and won't call them out, and most pro se/pro per litigants have no idea what to do -- or use "internet theories" that the courts can shoot down with ease.

But when you get at the heart and soul of THE LAW (as it really is, not as they are trying to make it seem, due to wanting to cut corners), then they are revealed as a paper tiger.

No time for more now, but talk later if you are interested.