Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I saw a liberal friend yesterday. It had been 9 years since we visited. She told me she has had cancer four times and was about ready to participate in a mRNA study to edit out the gene responsible for creating cancer. She praised the vaccine, saying it saved her. Then she equated the value of the mRNA vaccine technology with the cancer editing mRNA technology.

Later, I texted her this:

I am highly in favor of mRNA gene therapy.

I am so glad you are getting into this trial. How lucky! ❤️ God bless these brilliant scientists!

MRNA treatments are perfect for editing a damaging or malfunctioning gene. It can fix the error.

Just so you will still respect me, since I refuse the vax...I would like to explain a distinction... Even the inventor of the MRNA technology (Dr Malone) warned against it being used to alter our DNA to produce poisonous spike proteins as a means of building antibodies.

See the difference? One great mRNA application (like for cancer and genetic diseases) fixes DNA; but the vax mRNA application makes healthy DNA create poisons (to which we create antibodies).

That distinction makes sense now, right? You might not have heard the position I hold explained before... because of all the censorship. Even the inventor Dr Malone got censored and smeared! And all the brave doctors successfully treating hundreds of covid patients every day with Ivermectin and HCQ got censored and legally punished. So, how would the public know?

Censorship divides, but sharing of facts clarifies and unifies.

Love ya.

She replied: "Love you. I always loved our conversations."

Hmmm. I hope she gathered my meaning. I had to be gentle in her case.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I saw a liberal friend yesterday. It had been 9 years since we visited. She told me she has had cancer four times and was about ready to participate in a mRNA study to edit out the gene responsible for creating cancer. She praised the vaccine, saying it saved her. Then she equated the value of the mRNA vaccine technology with the cancer editing mRNA technology.

Later, I texted her this:

I am highly in favor of mRNA gene therapy.

I am so glad you are getting into this trial. How lucky! ❤️ God bless these brilliant scientists!

MRNA treatments are perfect for editing a damaging or malfunctioning gene. It can fix the error.

Just so you will still respect me, since I refuse the vax...I would like to explain a distinction... Even the inventor of the MRNA technology (Dr Malone) warned against it being used to alter our DNA to produce poisonous spike proteins as a means of building antibodies.

See the difference? One great mRNA application (like for cancer and genetic diseases) fixes DNA; but the vax mRNA application makes healthy DNA create poisons (to which we create antibodies).

That distinction makes sense now, right? You might not have heard the position I hold explained before... because of all the censorship. Even the inventor Dr Malone got censored and smeared! And all the brave doctors successfully treating hundreds of covid patients every day with Ivermectin and HCQ got censored and legally punished. So, how would the public know?

Censorship divides, but sharing of facts clarifies and unifies.

Love ya.

She replied: Loye you. I always loved our conversations.

Hmmm. I hope she gathered my meaning. I had to be gentle in her case.

2 years ago
1 score