It’s not. You made a statement that you can PROVE (emphasis yours) your claim. I’m inviting you to fulfil only what you said you could.

For the record, I well believe that he could be too and that he and his brother match the Maddy McCann suspect photofits.

Proving a claim is another matter though and I await your proof. PROOF, mind, not conjecture.

Unless you’re now going to demote your original statement to being a merely rhetorical one?

It’s not. You made a statement that you can PROVE (emphasis yours) your claim. I’m inviting you to fulfil only what you said you could.

For the record, I well believe that he could be too and that he and his brother match the Maddy McCann photofits too.

Proving a claim is another matter though and I await your proof. PROOF, mind, not conjecture.

Unless you’re now going to demote your original statement to being a merely rhetorical one?

It’s not. You made a statement that you can PROVE (emphasis yours) your claim. I’m inviting you to fulfil only what you said you could.

For the record, I well believe that he is too and that he and his brother match the Maddy McCann photofits too.

Proving a claim is another matter though and I await your proof. PROOF, mind, not conjecture.

Unless you’re now going to demote your original statement to being a merely rhetorical one?

It’s not. You made a statement that you can PROVE (emphasis yours) your claim. I’m inviting you to fulfil only what you said you could.

For the record, I well believe that he is too and that he and his brother match the Maddy McCann photofits too.

Proving a claim is another matter though and I await your proof. PROOF, mind, not conjecture

It’s not. You made a statement that you can PROVE (emphasis yours) your claim. I’m inviting you to do what you say you can.

For the record, I well believe that he is too and that he and his brother match the Maddy McCann photofits too.

Proving a claim is another matter though and I await your proof. PROOF, mind, not conjecture