Challenging everything is a stretch. That's just analysis paralysis. It's being able to entertain contradictory evidence when presented. No form of intelligence should have someone constantly reevaluating everything they know, thats how you end up knowing nothing. See flat earth for example. No new model is bring developed, just criticism of the old.

Challenging everything is a stretch. That's just analysis paralysis. It's being able to entertain contradictory evidence when presented. No form of intelligence should have someone constantly reevaluating everything they know, thats how you end up knowing nothing. See flat earth for example.

Challenging everything is a stretch. That's just analysis paralysis. It's being able to entertain contradictory evidence when presented. No form of intelligence should have someone constantly reevaluating everything they know, thats how you end up knowing nothing.