Science is not an example of a fallacy, because the point of science is to argue against itself before concluding it's results. Meaning the results were already challenged by the scientists themselves.

You would be better off with something like Sunk-Cost Fallacy and Putin. He has put so much effort into invading Ukraine, that he now feels it is too important to back away (even though it is not more important than it was before). It's a perfect example of sunk-cost.

Climate science is not an example of a fallacy, because the point of science is to argue against itself before concluding it's results. Meaning the results were already challenged by the scientists themselves.

You would be better off with something like Sunk-Cost Fallacy and Putin. He has put so much effort into invading Ukraine, that he now feels it is too important to back away (even though it is not more important than it was before). It's a perfect example of sunk-cost.

Climate science is not an example of a fallacy, because the point of science is to argue against itself before concluding it's results. Meaning the results were already challenged by the scientists themselves.

You would be better off with something like Sunk-Cost Fallacy and Putin. He has put so much effort into invading Ukraine, that he now feels it is too important to back away (even though it is not more important than it was before). It's a perfect example of sunk-cost.

Climate science is not an example of a fallacy, because the point of science is to argue against itself before concluding it's results. Meaning the results were already challenged by the scientists themselves.

You would be better off with something like Sunk-Cost Fallacy and Putin. He has put so much effort into invading Ukraine, that he now feels it is too important to back away (even though it is not more important than it was before). It's a perfect example of sunk-cost.

Climate science is not an example of a fallacy, because the point of science is to argue against itself before concluding it's results. Meaning the results were already challenged by the scientists themselves.

You would be better off with something like Sunk-Cost Fallacy and Putin. He has put so much effort into invading Ukraine, that he now feels it is too important to back away (even though it is not more important than it was before). It's a perfect example of sunk-cost.