Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Why wouldn't that be just? "I am God. I judge all. End of story". By definition of the word "God" that fits as it should.

It seems most aren't even aware of the Trinity is. It was added 70 years after Jesus death and had nothing to do with him or his words lol. Nothing.

Rome created it.

We is a term to describe magnificence and more importantly, it's royal. In Islam Allah is reference with a "we" as well. This is not evidence of plurality lol

The queen of England referenced herself (singular) as "we" but it doesn't mean she's describing 3 entities. She's speaking as royalty.

I've seen all the resources brother. The point of questioning it was to make others think about how ridiculous it is to try and justify a 3-1 but 1 God.

A God that is subject to "spiritual laws" (another anon actually wrote that.

Whatever, it is what it is lol

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Why wouldn't that be just? "I am God. I judge all. End of story". By definition of the word "God" that fits as it should.

It seems most aren't even aware of the Trinity is. It was added 70 years after Jesus death and had nothing to do with him or his words lol. Nothing.

Rome created it.

We is a term to describe magnificence and more importantly, it's royal. In Islam Allah is reference with a "we" as well. This is not evidence of plurality lol

The queen of England referenced herself (singular) as "we" but it doesn't mean she's describing 3 entities. She's speaking as royalty.

2 years ago
1 score