Aside from the multiple facet approach ( I believe this is the case also)
How you come to the concept is compelling and inspired a couple of thoughts.
First, the idea of Zero as the trickster. Bringing all to the zero sum balance. (see tarot).A Great Reset, so to speak.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss. lol
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory'. With sets of potential futures.
However, that theory twists potential future realities into seeing them as actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down..... futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So is the NEXT coin toss still 50/50 after it has come up heads 5 times in a row? Why or why not?
Why was the 'law of probability' broken so badly in that run?
What can explain my sister-in-law praying for a miracle, going into a casino and with one pull win 90k on a slot?
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.
One can try to control the whole by creating a system out of the gamble, but when you least expect it, that trickster will find a way to zero the balance, and this is why the Joker/Trickster is so huge right now.
The Stars That Play With Laughing Sam's Dice are fickle. Don't bet the house or the house will win. Just don't tell that to my sister-in-law. kek
The concept is compelling.
First, the idea of Zero as the trickster. Bringing all to the zero sum balance. (see tarot)
A Great Reset, so to speak.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss. lol
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory'. With sets of potential futures.
However, that theory twists potential future realities into seeing them as actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down..... futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So is the NEXT coin toss still 50/50 after it has come up heads 5 times in a row? Why or why not?
Why was the 'law of probability' broken so badly in that run?
What can explain my sister-in-law praying for a miracle, going into a casino and with one pull win 90k on a slot?
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.
One can try to control the whole by creating a system out of the gamble, but when you least expect it, that trickster will find a way to zero the balance, and this is why the Joker/Trickster is so huge right now.
The Stars That Play With Laughing Sam's Dice are fickle. Don't bet the house or the house will win. Just don't tell that to my sister-in-law. kek
The concept is compelling.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss.
LOL
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory'. With sets of potential futures.
However, that theory twists potential future realities into seeing them as actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down..... futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So is the NEXT coin toss still 50/50 after it has come up heads 5 times in a row? Why or why not?
Why was the 'law of probability' broken so badly in that run?
What can explain my sister-in-law praying for a miracle, going into a casino and with one pull win 90k on a slot?
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.
The concept is compelling.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss.
LOL
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory' that twists potential future realities into actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down.......future decision futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So is the NEXT coin toss still 50/50 after it has come up heads 5 times in a row? Why or why not?
Why was the 'law of probability' broken so badly in that run?
What can explain my sister-in-law praying for a miracle, going into a casino and with one pull win 90k on a slot?
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.
The concept is compelling.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss.
LOL
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory' that twists actual potential future realities into actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down.......future decision futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So is the NEXT coin toss still 50/50 after it has come up heads 5 times in a row? Why or why not?
Why was the 'law of probability' broken so badly in that run?
What can explain my sister-in-law praying for a miracle, going into a casino and with one pull win 90k on a slot?
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.
The concept is compelling.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss.
LOL
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory' that twists actual potential future realities into actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down.......future decision futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.