Au & Ag have been viable for commerce for millennia. Up until 1971, that is, when the process started back in 1781 to remove these barbaric relics from the economy as a means to settle contracts. That process ended in 1971.

Before that, an innovation on the physical was introduced: letters of credit and letters of deposit.

In this sense, a digital message echos the paper original. Exchanges echo the old institution of exchange bank. The most trusted exchange bank was the Old exchange bank of Amsterdam. And, for 200 years, it was a very successful enterprise, as it was the only institution with a full reserve position. That changed in the late 1770' s when the politics came in the way, as opposed to sound economics.

In any system, therefor, there is a point of sale, a collection point if you will, where the physical has to be exchanged for lesser iterations of physicality up until the point of being hashes existing in cyberspace powered by electricity.

There are two ways in which a payment object can be obtained.

1. the exchange of goods and services for that payment object.
2. the exchange of physical payment methods for this digital-object.

By definition, there will always be "places", where accumulation of these items exist, especially the physical.

Personally, I very much like this idea of bitcoin as a concept, as the amount of bitcoin is finite, though the fungible aspect is without limit. In a way this favors the ones early in. consider the price of a pizza at the beginning vs today. 10.000 bitcoin or so vs today. The system, from a value development perspective, has been set up smartly and it is dependent on its use. The more people use it in everyday transactions, the higher its value, because more coins are needed to support the growing number of transactions.

And since the number itself is finite, all it can do is appreciate against the physically produced items.

This means that production and the fruits of production are the only issue underlying a payment method.

Technically, each and every person has a production capacity, be it that this differs from person to person. So, every one can have their own coin. And it is your reputation that makes your coin of value. Do you produce well? Your coin will be accepted elsewhere. Do you make a shit show of your life? You will have difficulty in augmenting that value.

To me, here lies the rub in the system. What is physical, immediately pertains to our lives. It provides for consumables, be it food, water, storage, clothing, protection, agriculture, hunt, or the augmentation of our living conditions by items of art. And art, may very well improve on all kinds of products. A wood stove vs gas stove/gas heating vs electrical, just to name one item.

Services, like internet and all that comes with it, including protection, are just means to convey messages. Nothing in there can support our physical life, although it can help in acquiring the means to support that physical life.

Without government, it probably would be a system that works to elevate the human condition. However, governments do exist. And here we meet the actual purpose and effect of government.

In essence, governments are here to protect our rights. In a way, it creates by the potential of force, a safe space, for you to enjoy your birth rights. There are basically 4 elements that are used to trample on these rights.

1. Public health
2. Public morals
3. Public order
4. National security.

In a digital system with governments as they are now, there is one right that is absolute: to be recognized as a person before the law. And to fuck you sideways, governments have created a switcheroo where your private person, your physical living body through which your explicit will is expressed, is augmented with a public dead entity: natural person. This is important to the government and the UPU, the Universal Postal Union and its sister organization: ITU: the International Telecommunication Union.

When you read carefully their plans, it is to hook up more and more people into the postal code system, so those people can enjoy government services i.e. become tax payers. Being tax payer is equal to the position of a debt slave. And by graft, governments have turned this into a generational debt slavery in perpetuation.

Digitization is a means by which governments funnel all peoples into their version of reality.

Given the current balance of power, I personally am very very reluctant to be hooked up into systems that divorce me from physical reality and replaces that with a digital one.

Bitcoin is not a public good, or a public payment system. It is a private one, divorced from the public entities that control your life. Fiat currency is a public good. And taxes can only be paid in fiat currency, or legal tender.

Take careful note of the term: legal tender. Originally, the word tender meant: " formal offer for acceptance".

If you take careful note of civil or common law, you will find that the requirement to execute contracts in fiat currency does not exist. Which means, that under private contract, you can tender anything lawful, except for certain services and items that are against the Law of Nature. The expression: your money or your life, is such a private contract void by nature ab initio, for reasons of violating your birth rights.

Because each and everyone of us, by force and graft, is equipped with a public entity, the question for government is: how can be obtain control of a system that is not yet in our hands. for if we can, we control more. Since you act in the capacity of a public body, existing only on paper, your choices become subject to the rules and regulations issued by government.

This is where the word legal comes in.

This whole discussion boils down the issue to one single question: freedom or debt slavery?

Freedom is both physical and spiritual. And for the years I have been thinking about this subject, I can see the value of a digital dimension, but with a government that stays within the bounds of our birth rights. Since we are far from that position in this day and age, I find digitization quite concerning and actually: a trap.

Au & Ag have been viable for commerce for millennia. Up until 1971, that is, when the process started back in 1781 to remove these barbaric relics from the economy as a means to settle contracts. That process ended in 1971.

Before that, an innovation on the physical was introduced: letters of credit and letters of deposit.

In this sense, a digital message echos the paper original. Exchanges echo the old institution of exchange bank. The most trusted exchange bank was the Old exchange bank of Amsterdam. And, for 200 years, it was a very successful enterprise, as it was the only institution with a full reserve position. That changed in the late 1770' s when the politics came in the way, as opposed to sound economics.

In any system, therefor, there is a point of sale, a collection point if you will, where the physical has to be exchanged for lesser iterations of physicality up until the point of being hashes existing in cyberspace powered by electricity.

There are two ways in which a payment object can be obtained.

1. the exchange of goods and services for that payment object.
2. the exchange of physical payment methods for this digital-object.

By definition, there will always be "places", where accumulation of these items exist, especially the physical.

Personally, I very much like this idea of bitcoin as a concept, as the amount of bitcoin is finite, though the fungible aspect is without limit. In a way this favors the ones early in. consider the price of a pizza at the beginning vs today. 10.000 bitcoin or so vs today. The system, from a value development perspective, has been set up smartly and it is dependent on its use. The more people use it in everyday transactions, the higher its value, because more coins are needed to support the growing number of transactions.

And since the number itself is finite, all it can do is appreciate against the physically produced items.

This means that production and the fruits of production are the only issue underlying a payment method.

Technically, each and every person has a production capacity, be it that this differs from person to person. So, every one can have their own coin. And it is your reputation that makes your coin of value. Do you produce well? Your coin will be accepted elsewhere. Do you make a shit show of your life? You will have difficulty in augmenting that value.

To me, here lies the rub in the system. What is physical, immediately pertains to our lives. It provides for consumables, be it food, water, storage, clothing, protection, agriculture, hunt, or the augmentation of our living conditions by items of art. And art, may very well improve on all kinds of products. A wood stove vs gas stove/gas heating vs electrical, just to name one item.

Services, like internet and all that comes with it, including protection, are just means to convey messages. Nothing in there can support our physical life, although it can help in acquiring the means to support that physical life.

Without government, it probably would be a system that works to elevate the human condition. However, governments do exist. And here we meet the actual purpose and effect of government.

In essence, governments are here to protect our rights. In a way, it creates by the potential of force, a safe space, for you to enjoy your birth rights. There are basically 4 elements that are used to trample on these rights.

1. Public health
2. Public morals
3. Public order
4. National security.

In a digital system with governments as they are now, there is one right that is absolute: to be recognized as a person before the law. And to fuck you sideways, governments have created a switcheroo where your private person, your physical living body through which your explicit will is expressed, is augmented with a public dead entity: natural person. This is important to the government and the UPU, the Universal Postal Union and its sister organization: ITU: the International Telecommunication Union.

When you read carefully their plans, it is to hook up more and more people into the postal code system, so those people can enjoy government services i.e. become tax payers. Being tax payer is equal to the position of a debt slave. And by graft, governments have turned this into a generational debt slavery in perpetuation.

Digitization is a means by which governments funnel all peoples into their version of reality.

Given the current balance of power, I personally am very very reluctant to be hooked up into systems that divorce me from physical reality and replaces that with a digital one.

Bitcoin is not a public good, or a public payment system. It is a private one, divorced from the public entities that control your life. Fiat currency is a public good. And taxes can only be paid in fiat currency, or legal tender.

Take careful note of the term: legal tender. Originally, the word tender meant: " formal offer for acceptance".

If you take careful note of civil or common law, you will find that the requirement to execute contracts in fiat currency does not exist. Which means, that under private contract, you can tender anything lawful, except for certain services and items that are against the Law of Nature. The expression: your money or your life, is such a private contract void by nature ab initio, for reasons of violating your birth rights.

Because each and everyone of us, by force and graft, is equipped with a public entity, the question for government is: how can be obtain control on a system that is not yet in our hands. for if we can, we control more. Since you act in the capacity of a public body, existing only on paper, your choices become subject to the rules and regulations issued by government.

This is where the word legal comes in.

This whole discussion boils down the issue to one single question: freedom or debt slavery?

Freedom is both physical and spiritual. And for the years I have been thinking about this subject, I can see the value of a digital dimension, but with a government that stays within the bounds of our birth rights. Since we are far from that position in this day and age, I find digitization quite concerning and actually: a trap.

Au & Ag have been viable for commerce for millennia. Up until 1971, that is, when the process started back in 1781 to remove these barbaric relics from the economy as a means to settle contracts. That process ended in 1971.

Before that, an innovation on the physical was introduced: letters of credit and letters of deposit.

In this sense, a digital message echos the paper original. Exchanges echo the old institution of exchange bank. The most trusted exchange bank was the Old exchange bank of Amsterdam. And, for 200 years, it was a very successful enterprise, as it was the only institution with a full reserve position. That changed in the late 1770' s when the politics came in the way, as opposed to sound economics.

In any system, therefor, there is a point of sale, a collection point if you will, where the physical has to be exchanged for lesser iterations of physicality up until the point of being hashes existing in cyberspace powered by electricity.

There are two ways in which a payment object can be obtained.

1. the exchange of goods and services for that payment object.
2. the exchange of physical payment methods for this digital-object.

By definition, there will always be "places", where accumulation of these items exist, especially the physical.

Personally, I very much like this idea of bitcoin as a concept, as the amount of bitcoin is finite, though the fungible aspect is without limit. In a way this favors the ones early in. consider the price of a pizza at the beginning vs today. 10.000 bitcoin or so vs today. The system, from a value development perspective, has been set up smartly and it is dependent on its use. The more people use it in everyday transactions, the higher its value, because more coins are needed to support the growing number of transactions.

And since the number itself is finite, all it can do is appreciate against the physically produced items.

This means that production and the fruits of production are the only issue underlying a payment method.

Technically, each and every person has a production capacity, be it that this differs from person to person. So, every one can have their own coin. And it is your reputation that makes your coin of value. Do you produce well? Your coin will be accepted elsewhere. Do you make a shit show of your life? You will have difficulty in augmenting that value.

To me, here lies the rub in the system. What is physical, immediately pertains to our lives. It provides for consumables, be it food, water, storage, clothing, protection, agriculture, hunt, or the augmentation of our living conditions by items of art. And art, may very well improve on all kinds of products. A wood stove vs gas stove/gas heating vs electrical, just to name one item.

Services, like internet and all that comes with it, including protection, are just means to convey messages. Nothing in there can support our physical life, although it can help in acquiring the means to support that physical life.

Without government, it probably would be a system that works to elevate the human condition. However, governments do exist. And here we meet the actual purpose and effect of government.

In essence, governments are here to protect our rights. In a way, it creates by the potential of force, a safe space, your you to enjoy your birth rights. There are basically 4 elements that are used to trample on these rights.

1. Public health
2. Public morals
3. Public order
4. National security.

In a digital system with governments as they are now, there is one right that is absolute: to be recognized as a person before the law. And to fuck you sideways, governments have created a switcheroo where your private person, your physical living body through which your explicit will is expressed, is augmented with a public dead entity: natural person. This is important to the government and the UPU, the Universal Postal Union and its sister organization: ITU: the International Telecommunication Union.

When you read carefully their plans, it is to hook up more and more people into the postal code system, so those people can enjoy government services i.e. become tax payers. Being tax payer is equal to the position of a debt slave. And by graft, governments have turned this into a generational debt slavery in perpetuation.

Digitization is a means by which governments funnel all peoples into their version of reality.

Given the current balance of power, I personally am very very reluctant to be hooked up into systems that divorce me from physical reality and replaces that with a digital one.

Bitcoin is not a public good, or a public payment system. It is a private one, divorced from the public entities that control your life. Fiat currency is a public good. And taxes can only be paid in fiat currency, or legal tender.

Take careful note of the term: legal tender. Originally, the word tender meant: " formal offer for acceptance".

If you take careful note of civil or common law, you will find that the requirement to execute contracts in fiat currency does not exist. Which means, that under private contract, you can tender anything lawful, except for certain services and items that are against the Law of Nature. The expression: your money or your life, is such a private contract void by nature ab initio, for reasons of violating your birth rights.

Because each and everyone of us, by force and graft, is equipped with a public entity, the question for government is: how can be obtain control on a system that is not yet in our hands. for if we can, we control more. Since you act in the capacity of a public body, existing only on paper, your choices become subject to the rules and regulations issued by government.

This is where the word legal comes in.

This whole discussion boils down the issue to one single question: freedom or debt slavery?

Freedom is both physical and spiritual. And for the years I have been thinking about this subject, I can see the value of a digital dimension, but with a government that stays within the bounds of our birth rights. Since we are far from that position in this day and age, I find digitization quite concerning and actually: a trap.

Au & Ag have been viable for commerce for millennia. Up until 1971, that is, when the process started back in 1781 to remove these barbaric relics from the economy as a means to settle contracts. That process ended in 1971.

Before that, an innovation on the physical was introduced: letters of credit and letters of deposit.

In this sense, a digital message echos the paper original. Exchanges echo the old institution of exchange bank. The most trusted exchange bank was the Old exchange bank of Amsterdam. And, for 200 years, it was a very successful enterprise, as it was the only institution with a full reserve position. That changed in the late 1770' s when the politics came in the way, as opposed to sound economics.

In any system, therefor, there is a point of sale, a collection point if you will, where the physical has to be exchanged for lesser iterations of physicality up until the point of being hashes existing in cyberspace powered by electricity.

There are two ways in which a payment object can be obtained.

1. the exchange of goods and services for that payment object.
2. the exchange of physical payment methods for this digital-object.

By definition, there will always be "places", where accumulation of these items exist, especially the physical.

Personally, I very much like this idea of bitcoin as a concept, as the amount of bitcoin is finite, though the fungible aspect is without limit. In a way this favors the ones early in. consider the price of a pizza at the beginning vs today. 10.000 bitcoin or so vs today. The system, from a value development perspective, has been set up smartly and it is dependent on its use. The more people use it in everyday transactions, the higher its value, because more coins are needed to support the growing number of transactions.

And since the number itself is finite, all it can do is appreciate against the physically produced items.

This means that production and the fruits of production are the only issue underlying a payment method.

Technically, each and every person has a production capacity, be it that this differs from person to person. So, every one can have their own coin. And it is your reputation that makes your coin of value. Do you produce well? your coin will be accepted elsewhere. Do you make a shit show of your life? You will have difficulty in augmenting that value.

To me, here lies the rub in the system. What is physical, immediately pertains to our lives. It provides for consumables, be it food, water, storage, clothing, protection, agriculture, hunt, or the augmentation of our living conditions by items of art. And art, may very well improve on all kinds of products. A wood stove vs gas stove/gas heating vs electrical, just to name one item.

Services, like internet and all that comes with it, including protection, are just means to convey messages. Nothing in there can support our physical life, although it can help in acquiring the means to support that physical life.

Without government, it probably would be a system that works to elevate the human condition. However, governments do exist. And here we meet the actual purpose and effect of government.

in essence, governments are here to protect our rights. In a way, it creates by the potential of force, a safe space, your you to enjoy your birth rights. There are basically 4 elements that are used to trample on these rights.

1. Public health
2. Public morals
3. Public order
4. National security.

In a digital system with governments as they are now, there is one right that is absolute: to be recognized as a person before the law. And to fuck you sideways, governments have created a switcheroo where your private person, your physical living body through which your explicit will is expressed, is augmented with a public dead entity: natural person. This is important to the government and the UPU, the Universal Postal Union and its sister organization: ITU: the International Telecommunication Union.

When you read carefully their plans, it is to hook up more and more people into the postal code system, so those people can enjoy government services i.e. become tax payers. Being tax payer is equal to the position of a debt slave. And by graft, governments have turned this into a generational debt slavery in perpetuation.

Digitization is a means by which governments funnel all peoples into their version of reality.

Given the current balance of power, I personally am very very reluctant to be hooked up into systems that divorce me from physical reality and replaces that with a digital one.

Bitcoin is not a public good, or a public payment system. It is a private one, divorced from the public entities that control your life. Fiat currency is a public good. And taxes can only be paid in fiat currency, or legal tender.

Take careful note of the term: legal tender. Originally, the word tender meant: " formal offer for acceptance".

If you take careful note of civil or common law, you will find that the requirement to execute contracts in fiat currency does not exist. Which means, that under private contract, you can tender anything lawful, except for certain services and items that are against the Law of Nature. The expression: your money or your life, is such a private contract void by nature ab initio, for reasons of violating your birth rights.

Because each and everyone of us, by force and graft, is equipped with a public entity, the question for government is: how can be obtain control on a system that is not yet in our hands. for if we can, we control more. Since you act in the capacity of a public body, existing only on paper, your choices become subject to the rules and regulations issued by government.

This is where the word legal comes in.

This whole discussion boils down the issue to one single question: freedom or debt slavery?

Freedom is both physical and spiritual. And for the years I have been thinking about this subject, I can see the value of a digital dimension, but with a government that stays within the bounds of our birth rights. Since we are far from that position in this day and age, I find digitization quite concerning and actually: a trap.

Au & Ag have been viable for commerce for millennia. Up until 1971, that is, when the process started back in 1781 to remove these barbaric relics from the economy as a means to settle contracts. That process ended in 1971.

Before that, an innovation on the physical was introduced: letters of credit and letters of deposit.

In this sense, a digital message echos the paper original. Exchanges echo the old institution of exchange bank. The most trusted exchange bank was the Old exchange bank of Amsterdam. And, for 200 years, it was a very successful enterprise, as it was the only institution with a full reserve position. That changed in the late 1770' s when the politics came in the way, as opposed to sound economics.

In any system, therefor, there is a point of sale, a collection point if you will, where the physical has to be exchanged for lesser iterations of physicality up until the point of being hashes existing in cyberspace powered by electricity.

There are two ways in which a payment object can be obtained.

1. the exchange of goods and services for that payment object.
2. the exchange of physical payment methods for this digital-object.

By definition, there will always be "places", where accumulation of these items exist, especially the physical.

Personally, I very much like this idea of bitcoin as a concept, as the amount of bitcoin is finite, though the fungible aspect is without limit. In a way this favors the ones early in. consider the price of a pizza at the beginning vs today. 10.000 bitcoin or so vs today. The system, from a value development perspective, has been set up smartly and it is dependent on use. The more people use it in everyday transactions, the higher its value, because more coins are needed to support the growing number of transactions.

And since the number itself is finite, all it can do is appreciate against the physically produced items.

This means that production and the fruits of production are the only issue underlying a payment method.

Technically, each and every person has a production capacity, be it that this differs from person to person. So, every one can have their own coin. And it is your reputation that makes your coin of value. Do you produce well? your coin will be accepted elsewhere. Do you make a shit show of your life? You will have difficulty in augmenting that value.

To me, here lies the rub in the system. What is physical, immediately pertains to our lives. It provides for consumables, be it food, water, storage, clothing, protection, agriculture, hunt, or the augmentation of our living conditions by items of art. And art, may very well improve on all kinds of products. A wood stove vs gas stove/gas heating vs electrical, just to name one item.

Services, like internet and all that comes with it, including protection, are just means to convey messages. Nothing in there can support our physical life, although it can help in acquiring the means to support that physical life.

Without government, it probably would be a system that works to elevate the human condition. However, governments do exist. And here we meet the actual purpose and effect of government.

in essence, governments are here to protect our rights. In a way, it creates by the potential of force, a safe space, your you to enjoy your birth rights. There are basically 4 elements that are used to trample on these rights.

1. Public health
2. Public morals
3. Public order
4. National security.

In a digital system with governments as they are now, there is one right that is absolute: to be recognized as a person before the law. And to fuck you sideways, governments have created a switcheroo where your private person, your physical living body through which your explicit will is expressed, is augmented with a public dead entity: natural person. This is important to the government and the UPU, the Universal Postal Union and its sister organization: ITU: the International Telecommunication Union.

When you read carefully their plans, it is to hook up more and more people into the postal code system, so those people can enjoy government services i.e. become tax payers. Being tax payer is equal to the position of a debt slave. And by graft, governments have turned this into a generational debt slavery in perpetuation.

Digitization is a means by which governments funnel all peoples into their version of reality.

Given the current balance of power, I personally am very very reluctant to be hooked up into systems that divorce me from physical reality and replaces that with a digital one.

Bitcoin is not a public good, or a public payment system. It is a private one, divorced from the public entities that control your life. Fiat currency is a public good. And taxes can only be paid in fiat currency, or legal tender.

Take careful note of the term: legal tender. Originally, the word tender meant: " formal offer for acceptance".

If you take careful note of civil or common law, you will find that the requirement to execute contracts in fiat currency does not exist. Which means, that under private contract, you can tender anything lawful, except for certain services and items that are against the Law of Nature. The expression: your money or your life, is such a private contract void by nature ab initio, for reasons of violating your birth rights.

Because each and everyone of us, by force and graft, is equipped with a public entity, the question for government is: how can be obtain control on a system that is not yet in our hands. for if we can, we control more. Since you act in the capacity of a public body, existing only on paper, your choices become subject to the rules and regulations issued by government.

This is where the word legal comes in.

This whole discussion boils down the issue to one single question: freedom or debt slavery?

Freedom is both physical and spiritual. And for the years I have been thinking about this subject, I can see the value of a digital dimension, but with a government that stays within the bounds of our birth rights. Since we are far from that position in this day and age, I find digitization quite concerning and actually: a trap.

Au & Ag have been viable for commerce for millennia. Up until 1971, that is, when the process started back in 1781 to remove these barbaric relics from the economy as a means to settle contracts. That process ended in 1971.

Before that, an innovation on the physical was introduced: letters of credit and letters of deposit.

In this sense, a digital message echos the paper original. Exchanges echo the old institution of exchange bank. The most trusted exchange bank was the Old exchange bank of Amsterdam. And, for 200 years, it was a very successful enterprise, as it was the only institution with a full reserve position. That changed in the late 1770' s when the politics came in the way, as opposed to sound economics.

In any system, therefor, there is a point of sale, a collection point if you will, where the physical has to be exchanged for lesser iterations of physicality up until the point of being hashes existing in cyberspace powered by electricity.

There are two ways in which a payment object can be obtained.

1. the exchange of goods and services for that payment object.
2. the exchange of physical payment methods for this digital-object.

By definition, there will always be "places", where accumulation of these items exist, especially the physical.

Personally, I very much like this idea of bitcoin as a concept, as the amount of bitcoin is finite, though the fungible aspect is without limit. In a way this favors the ones early in. consider the price of a pizza at the beginning vs today. 10.000 bitcoin or so vs today. The system, from a value development perspective, has been set up smartly and it dependent on use. The more people use it in everyday transactions, the higher its value, because more coins are needed to support the growing number of transactions.

And since the number itself is finite, all it can do is appreciate against the physically produced items.

This means that production and the fruits of production are the only issue underlying a payment method.

Technically, each and every person has a production capacity, be it that this differs from person to person. So, every one can have their own coin. And it is your reputation that makes your coin of value. Do you produce well? your coin will be accepted elsewhere. Do you make a shit show of your life? You will have difficulty in augmenting that value.

To me, here lies the rub in the system. What is physical, immediately pertains to our lives. It provides for consumables, be it food, water, storage, clothing, protection, agriculture, hunt, or the augmentation of our living conditions by items of art. And art, may very well improve on all kinds of products. A wood stove vs gas stove/gas heating vs electrical, just to name one item.

Services, like internet and all that comes with it, including protection, are just means to convey messages. Nothing in there can support our physical life, although it can help in acquiring the means to support that physical life.

Without government, it probably would be a system that works to elevate the human condition. However, governments do exist. And here we meet the actual purpose and effect of government.

in essence, governments are here to protect our rights. In a way, it creates by the potential of force, a safe space, your you to enjoy your birth rights. There are basically 4 elements that are used to trample on these rights.

1. Public health
2. Public morals
3. Public order
4. National security.

In a digital system with governments as they are now, there is one right that is absolute: to be recognized as a person before the law. And to fuck you sideways, governments have created a switcheroo where your private person, your physical living body through which your explicit will is expressed, is augmented with a public dead entity: natural person. This is important to the government and the UPU, the Universal Postal Union and its sister organization: ITU: the International Telecommunication Union.

When you read carefully their plans, it is to hook up more and more people into the postal code system, so those people can enjoy government services i.e. become tax payers. Being tax payer is equal to the position of a debt slave. And by graft, governments have turned this into a generational debt slavery in perpetuation.

Digitization is a means by which governments funnel all peoples into their version of reality.

Given the current balance of power, I personally am very very reluctant to be hooked up into systems that divorce me from physical reality and replaces that with a digital one.

Bitcoin is not a public good, or a public payment system. It is a private one, divorced from the public entities that control your life. Fiat currency is a public good. And taxes can only be paid in fiat currency, or legal tender.

Take careful note of the term: legal tender. Originally, the word tender meant: " formal offer for acceptance".

If you take careful note of civil or common law, you will find that the requirement to execute contracts in fiat currency does not exist. Which means, that under private contract, you can tender anything lawful, except for certain services and items that are against the Law of Nature. The expression: your money or your life, is such a private contract void by nature ab initio, for reasons of violating your birth rights.

Because each and everyone of us, by force and graft, is equipped with a public entity, the question for government is: how can be obtain control on a system that is not yet in our hands. for if we can, we control more. Since you act in the capacity of a public body, existing only on paper, your choices become subject to the rules and regulations issued by government.

This is where the word legal comes in.

This whole discussion boils down the issue to one single question: freedom or debt slavery?

Freedom is both physical and spiritual. And for the years I have been thinking about this subject, I can see the value of a digital dimension, but with a government that stays within the bounds of our birth rights. Since we are far from that position in this day and age, I find digitization quite concerning and actually: a trap.