Instead of responding to my answer to your claim that I am working hard to negate Mike Lindell's credibility, you edited your original comment and added a second criticism to your original comment. See below:
Original comment:
The real question should be "Why are you working so hard to negate Mile Lindell's credibility?"
Edited Comment:
"And you started your rant off with "IMO", so you're only stating your opinion."
Yes, I did start my comment with "IMO" because I am only stating my opinion, and then provided the context of the material to back up that opinion with a transcript of the relevant portion of the Bannon / Lindell interview so that anyone reading my opinion could also read "for themselves" what I based that opinion on.
I also included a link to the video from which the transcription was made so that the transcript could be checked for accuracy against the primary source documenting the Bannon / Lindell exchange on the subject at hand and if possible, viewed first hand if time permitted.
My original comment was in reply to u/SilverWolf55 comment of how they interpreted the Bannon / Lindell interview, concurring with OP opinion that the gag order had been lifted (it had and has not - the USG/DOJ memorandum stated that the issue was moot as far as issues before the Nevada court was concerned) and in particular SilverWolf55's analysis regarding "Chinese" interference, see copy/paste below:
"But thankfully it is the 2020 election data that exposes Chinese interference (among others)..."
The intent was to engage with SilverWolf55 and discuss, not the fact of exposing the election interference appearing to originate from servers in China (highly likely but no one has put out concrete evidence as of yet), but that the 32 terabytes of PCAP data Lindell has acquired from Dennis Montgomery contained Scorecard software (Montgomery developed) with a unique electronic marker that Montgomery is alleged (Mary Fanning source) to have inserted into the source code of the Scorecard software (which is used in the packet harvesting portion of the collection of the data packets off the internet) but that the electronic marker present in the China based election hacking / interference (part of the 32 terabytes Lindell wants to use in evidence in his court case) is the same electronic marker in the source code which Dennis Montgomery had been forced to turn over to the FBI a few years back, and who (the FBI) claim to have then given that source code to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community for secure and safe keeping.
In other words, "FBI... you got some splainin to do!"
Hence Lindell's statements later on 10/08/22 at the Trump Rally site in Minden, NV to have subpeonaed Brennon, Clapper, Baker (former DOJ attorney) and others in connection with the Dominion v. Lindell defamation lawsuit. More shots across the bow of these (and other) deep state actors.
Trust the plan.
But, you, of course had other ideas since you are so well informed and up to date on the extremely nuanced Lawfare battles being fought to suppress Lindell's Montgomery originated 32 terabytes of 2020 election data.
Read the USG/DOJ memoradum and explain exactly what it means in regard to the release of the 2020 PCAP data in the Montgomery v. Trepp case and then consider what is going to happen if and when Lindell tries to submit the 32 terabytes as evidence in the Dominion v. Lindell case. The merry-go-round starts up all over again.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1232.0.pdf
Why take the time to transcribe the interview? Because a lot of people on GAW do not have the time to watch a video but do have the time to read the exchange between Bannon and Lindell and comprehend why I have come to the opinion based on my analysis. Perhaps I should have started with IMA (In My Analysis) and you would have not categorized my comment a "rant."
In addition to the Bannon / Lindell interview, I provided a link to the video of that segment of The Moment of Truth Summit which Lindell refers to during the interview when Lindell states he was on stage with lawyers and Jeff O'Donnell. If you had watched that video, then you would have a better comprehension of how Lindell is shaping the Dennis Montgomery narrative as a psyop to attack the opposition (witting and unwitting) and condition his followers (unwitting - the witting know what he is doing and why he is doing it.)
Not responding to my reply to your original comment, but editing your original comment to further elevate (through an unmarked edit) your "opinion" of my opinion, particularly not having reviewed any of the supporting material (reading a transcription of the Bannon / Lindell interview is like looking at a Jackson Pollock painting through an opaque grey piece of cellophane) or checking my post or comment history to see if there is a pattern of attacking Mike Lindell's (intentional) hyperbolic interpretation of events, like the USG/DOJ memorandum and the Lindell/Olsen/O'Donnell segment of The Moment of Truth Summit, is a coward's response.
Either engage in honest dialog and debate on the merits of the issue or find someone else to try and anonymously intimidate with baseless personal attacks.
Have a nice day.
Instead of responding to my answer to your claim that I am working hard to negate Mike Lindell's credibility, you edited your original comment and added a second criticism to your original comment. See below:
Original comment:
The real question should be "Why are you working so hard to negate Mile Lindell's credibility?"
Edited Comment:
"And you started your rant off with "IMO", so you're only stating your opinion."
Yes, I did start my comment with "IMO" because I am only stating my opinion, and then provided the context of the material to back up that opinion with a transcript of the relevant portion of the Bannon / Lindell interview so that anyone reading my opinion could also read "for themselves" what I based that opinion on.
I also included a link to the video from which the transcription was made so that the transcript could be checked for accuracy against the primary source documenting the Bannon / Lindell exchange on the subject at hand and if possible, viewed first hand if time permitted.
My original comment was in reply to u/SilverWolf55 comment of how they interpreted the Bannon / Lindell interview, concurring with OP opinion that the gag order had been lifted (it had and has not - the USG/DOJ memorandum stated that the issue was moot as far as issues before the Nevada court was concerned) and in particular SilverWolf55's analysis regarding "Chinese" interference, see copy/paste below:
"But thankfully it is the 2020 election data that exposes Chinese interference (among others)..."
The intent was to engage with SilverWolf55 and discuss, not the fact of exposing the election interference appearing to originate from servers in China (highly likely but no one has put out concrete evidence as of yet), but that the 32 terabytes of PCAP data Lindell has acquired from Dennis Montgomery contained Scorecard software (Montgomery developed) with a unique electronic marker that Montgomery is alleged (Mary Fanning source) to have inserted into the source code of the Scorecard software (which is used in the packet harvesting portion of the collection of the data packets off the internet) but that the electronic marker present in the China based election hacking / interference (part of the 32 terabytes Lindell wants to use in evidence in his court case) is the same electronic marker in the source code which Dennis Montgomery had been forced to turn over to the FBI a few years back, and who (the FBI) claim to have then given that source code to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community for secure and safe keeping.
In other words, "FBI... you got some splainin to do!"
Hence Lindell's statements later on 10/08/22 at the Trump Rally site in Minden, NV to have subpeonaed Brennon, Clapper, Baker (former DOJ attorney) and others in connection with the Dominion v. Lindell defamation lawsuit. More shots across the bow of these (and other) deep state actors.
Trust the plan.
But, you, of course had other ideas since you are so will informed and up to date on the extremely nuanced Lawfare battles being fought to suppress Lindell's Montgomery originated 32 terabytes of 2020 collection data.
Read the USG/DOJ memoradum and explain exactly what it means in regard to the release of the 2020 PCAP data in the Montgomery v. Trepp case and then consider what is going to happen if and when Lindell tries to submit the 32 terabytes as evidence in the Dominion v. Lindell case. The merry-go-round starts up all over again.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1232.0.pdf
Why take the time to transcribe the interview? Because a lot of people on GAW do not have the time to watch a video but do have the time to read the exchange between Bannon and Lindell and comprehend why I have come to the opinion based on my analysis. Perhaps I should have started with IMA (In My Analysis) and you would have not categorized my comment a "rant."
In addition to the Bannon / Lindell interview, I provided a link to the video of that segment of The Moment of Truth Summit which Lindell refers to during the interview when Lindell states he was on stage with lawyers and Jeff O'Donnell. If you had watched that video, then you would have a better comprehension of how Lindell is shaping the Dennis Montgomery narrative as a psyop to attack the opposition (witting and unwitting) and condition his followers (unwitting - the witting know what he is doing and why he is doing it.)
Not responding to my reply to your original comment, but editing your original comment to further elevate (through an unmarked edit) your "opinion" of my opinion, particularly not having reviewed any of the supporting material (reading a transcription of the Bannon / Lindell interview is like looking at a Jackson Pollock painting through an opaque grey piece of cellophane) or checking my post or comment history to see if there is a pattern of attacking Mike Lindell's (intentional) hyperbolic interpretation of events, like the USG/DOJ memorandum and the Lindell/Olsen/O'Donnell segment of The Moment of Truth Summit, is a coward's response.
Either engage in honest dialog and debate on the merits of the issue or find someone else to try and anonymously intimidate with baseless personal attacks.
Have a nice day.
Instead of responding to my answer to your claim that I am working hard to negate Mike Lindell's credibility, you edited your original comment and added a second criticism to your original comment. See below:
Original comment:
The real question should be "Why are you working so hard to negate Mile Lindell's credibility?"
Edited Comment:
"And you started your rant off with "IMO", so you're only stating your opinion."
Yes, I did start my comment with "IMO" because I am only stating my opinion, and then provided the context of the material to back up that opinion with a transcript of the relevant portion of the Bannon / Lindell interview so that anyone reading my opinion could also read "for themselves" what I based that opinion on.
I also included a link to the video from which the transcription was made so that the transcript could be checked for accuracy against the primary source documenting the Bannon / Lindell exchange on the subject at hand and if possible, viewed first hand if time permitted.
My original comment was in reply to u/SilverWolf55 comment of how they interpreted the Bannon / Lindell interview, concurring with OP opinion that the gag order had been lifted (it had and has not - the USG/DOJ memorandum stated that the issue was moot as far as issues before the Nevada court was concerned) and in particular SilverWolf55's analysis regarding "Chinese" interference, see copy/paste below:
"But thankfully it is the 2020 election data that exposes Chinese interference (among others)..."
The intent was to engage with SilverWolf55 and discuss, not the fact of exposing the election interference appearing to originate from servers in China (highly likely but no one has put out concrete evidence as of yet), but that the 32 terabytes of PCAP data Lindell has acquired from Dennis Montgomery contained Scorecard software (Montgomery developed) with a unique electronic marker that Montgomery is alleged (Mary Fanning source) to have inserted into the source code of the Scorecard software (which is used in the packet harvesting portion of the collection of the data packets off the internet) but that the electronic marker present in the China based election hacking / interference (part of the 32 terabytes Lindell wants to use in evidence in his court case) is the same electronic marker in the source code which Dennis Montgomery had been forced to turn over to the FBI a few years back, and who (the FBI) claim to have then given that source code to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community for secure and safe keeping.
In other words, "FBI... you got some splainin to do!"
Hence Lindell's statements later on 10/08/22 at the Trump Rally site in Minden, NV to have subpeonaed Brennon, Clapper, Baker (former DOJ attorney) and others the Dominion v. Lindell lawsuit. More shots across the bow of these (and other) deep state actors.
But, you, of course had other ideas since you are so will informed and up to date on the extremely nuanced Lawfare battles being fought to suppress Lindell's Montgomery originated 32 terabytes of 2020 collection data.
Read the USG/DOJ memoradum and explain exactly what it means in regard to the release of the 2020 PCAP data in the Montgomery v. Trepp case and then consider what is going to happen if and when Lindell tries to submit the 32 terabytes as evidence in the Dominion v. Lindell case. The merry-go-round starts up all over again.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1232.0.pdf
Why take the time to transcribe the interview? Because a lot of people on GAW do not have the time to watch a video but do have the time to read the exchange between Bannon and Lindell and comprehend why I have come to the opinion based on my analysis. Perhaps I should have started with IMA (In My Analysis) and you would have not categorized my comment a "rant."
In addition to the Bannon / Lindell interview, I provided a link to the video of that segment of The Moment of Truth Summit which Lindell refers to during the interview when Lindell states he was on stage with lawyers and Jeff O'Donnell. If you had watched that video, then you would have a better comprehension of how Lindell is shaping the Dennis Montgomery narrative as a psyop to attack the opposition (witting and unwitting) and condition his followers (unwitting - the witting know what he is doing and why he is doing it.)
Not responding to my reply to your original comment, but editing your original comment to further elevate (through an unmarked edit) your "opinion" of my opinion, particularly not having reviewed any of the supporting material (reading a transcription of the Bannon / Lindell interview is like looking at a Jackson Pollock painting through an opaque grey piece of cellophane) or checking my post or comment history to see if there is a pattern of attacking Mike Lindell's (intentional) hyperbolic interpretation of events, like the USG/DOJ memorandum and the Lindell/Olsen/O'Donnell segment of The Moment of Truth Summit, is a coward's response.
Either engage in honest dialog and debate on the merits of the issue or find someone else to try and anonymously intimidate with baseless personal attacks.
Have a nice day.