How is it not usury even if you have a choice to get into it or not? I think what makes the debt system (whether we call it usury or not) so heinous is the fact that we create a whole class of wealthy people who contribute nothing to society but spending significant wealth to indirectly influence culture to take on debt to "have what they want". This has been going on for centuries (albeit with respect to living standards) and I would argue that that is the main point of the Khazarian narrative.

These people (Khazarian in descent or not) are literally living off the backs of everyone, they influence through the media and culture to keep the system instead of our culture being rooted in financial responsibility being you only take on what you can pay for at the moment. There are of course cases out there to pull on the heartstrings and point at to say "see this is why you sometimes need debt!!1!" But at the end of the day, do we really if we did not have a debt/inflation premised financial system? My interpretation would be that yes we do have a usury based financial system.

To me the Khazarian narrative dispells all the "muh joos" arguments to hit closer to the root of the problem and to show the way the world has been orchestrated since at least Babylon. The Cabal that dominates us today is descended from namestealers who have no nation but seek money and the power that comes with it. They infiltrate and make connections worldwide with the most influential and powerful people. They know the game better than any of us and the Khazarian narrative seems to communicate that to us whether you get caught up on tangents or not.

Furthermore, it just seems like the "Khazarian" narrative further expands upon the Phonecian/Caananite one: https://rumble.com/v1nle3u-the-occult-hidden-world-they-secretly-built-around-us.html

How is it not usury even if you have a choice to get into it or not? I think what makes the debt system (whether we call it usury or not) so heinous is the fact that we create a whole class of wealthy people who contribute nothing to society but spending significant wealth to indirectly influence culture to take on debt to "have what they want". This has been going on for centuries (albeit with respect to living standards) and I would argue that that is the main point of the Khazarian narrative.

These people (Khazarian in descent or not) are literally living off the backs of everyone, they influence through the media and culture to keep the system instead of our culture being rooted in financial responsibility being you only take on what you can pay for at the moment. There are of course cases out there to pull on the heartstrings and point at to say "see this is why you sometimes need debt!!1!" But at the end of the day, do we really if we did not have a debt/inflation premised financial system? My interpretation would be that yes we do have a usury based financial system.

To me the Khazarian narrative dispells all the "muh joos" arguments to hit closer to the root of the problem and to show the way the world has been orchestrated since at least Babylon. The Cabal that dominates us today is descended from namestealers who have no nation but seek money and the power that comes with it. They infiltrate and make connections worldwide with the most influential and powerful people. They know the game better than any of us and the Khazarian narrative seems to communicate that to us whether you get caught up on tangents or not.