Being in the YGL program absolutely implies being part of the NWO objective. It is absolutely evidence of that, and having "evidence of something" is what "implies" means in the vernacular use of that word. (It means something different in mathematics or formal logic.)

What it is not is "proof." This of course is the misunderstanding of what the word "proof" means.

Just because there is evidence of something, doesn't mean that the conclusions one draws from what the evidence implies are correct.

"Proof" is a decision. It is the decision, different for each individual, that the evidence is sufficient to support the conclusion. That is why in formal investigations we use terms like "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt," or "Preponderance of the evidence," etc..

In the first case, "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a statement that the evidence seen is sufficient, that no doubt based on reason still remains. You may still have doubts based on fear, or even intuition, but none based on the process of reason (logic, evidence, etc.). In the second case, "preponderance of the evidence" means that there may still remain some reasonable doubts, but the evidence is sufficiently convincing that you are leaning towards a specific conclusion.

Thus we have many levels of "proof," all based on how much evidence there is, and what any one person thinks about the evidence.

Being part of the YGL program is evidence of NWO. I have yet to see a single person involved with the WEF in any way, that upon further investigation, doesn't have many other ties to NWO activities. That would be corroborating evidence to support the implied NWO-YGL connection.

Does Tulsi have such additional evidence? Of course, there is a ton. She is obviously an insider. But so is Trump, Elon, Gen. Flynn, De Santis, blah, blah, blah, everyone. The evidence, once you get past the cognitive dissonance and actually look, suggests that EVERYONE who is ANYONE is an insider. The question is, are they working towards We The People understanding the fraud of government, or are they working towards strengthening our enslavement.

Determining that for anyone (including Q) is non-trivial and requires honest investigation, taken on by many people, always keeping an open mind, with the sole desire of getting to the Truth, no matter what that Truth may be.

Being in the YGL program absolutely implies being part of the NWO objective. It is absolutely evidence of that, and having "evidence of something" is what "implies" means in the vernacular use of that word. (It means something different in mathematics or formal logic.)

What it is not is "proof." This of course is the misunderstanding of what the word "proof" means.

Just because there is evidence of something, doesn't mean that the conclusions one draws from what the evidence implies are correct.

"Proof" is a decision. It is the decision, different for each individual, that the evidence is sufficient to support the conclusion. That is why in formal investigations we use terms like "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt," or "Preponderance of the evidence," etc..

In the first case, "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a statement that the evidence seen is sufficient, that no doubt based on reason still remains. You may still have doubts based on fear, or even intuition, but none based on the process of reason (logic, evidence, etc.). In the second case, "preponderance of the evidence" means that there may still remain some reasonable doubts, but the evidence is sufficiently convincing that you are leaning towards a specific conclusion.

Thus we have many levels of "proof," all based on how much evidence there is, and what any one person thinks about the evidence.

Being part of the YGL program is evidence of NWO. I have yet to see a single person involved with the WEF in any way, that upon further investigation, doesn't have many other ties to NWO activities. That would be corroborating evidence to support the implied NWO-YGL connection.

Does Tulsi have such additional evidence? Of course, there is a ton. She is obviously an insider. But so is Trump, Elon, Gen. Flynn, De Santis, blah, blah, blah, everyone. The evidence, once you get past the cognitive dissonance and actually look, suggests that EVERYONE who is ANYONE is an insider. The question is, are they working towards We The People understanding the fraud of government, or are they working towards strengthening our enslavement in The Matrix.

Determining that for anyone (including Q) is non-trivial and requires honest investigation, taken on by many people, always keeping an open mind, with the sole desire of getting to the Truth, no matter what that Truth may be.

Being in the YGL program absolutely implies being part of the NWO objective. It is absolutely evidence of that, and having "evidence of something" is what "implies" means in the vernacular use of that word. (It means something different in mathematics or formal logic.)

What it is not is "proof." This of course is the misunderstanding of what the word "proof" means.

Just because there is evidence of something, doesn't mean that the conclusions one draws from what the evidence implies are correct.

"Proof" is a decision. It is the decision, different for each individual, that the evidence is sufficient to support the conclusion. That is why in formal investigations we use terms like "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt," or "Preponderance of the evidence," etc..

In the first case, "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a statement that the evidence seen is sufficient, that no doubt based on reason still remains. You may still have doubts based on fear, or even intuition, but none based on the process of reason (logic, evidence, etc.). In the second case, "preponderance of the evidence" means that there may still remain some reasonable doubts, but the evidence is sufficiently convincing that you are leaning towards a specific conclusion.

Thus we have many levels of "proof," all based on how much evidence there is.

Being part of the YGL program is evidence of NWO. I have yet to see a single person involved with the WEF in any way, that upon further investigation, doesn't have many other ties to NWO activities. That would be corroborating evidence to support the implied NWO-YGL connection.

Does Tulsi have such additional evidence? Of course, there is a ton. She is obviously an insider. But so is Trump, Elon, Gen. Flynn, De Santis, blah, blah, blah, everyone. The evidence, once you get past the cognitive dissonance and actually look, suggests that EVERYONE who is ANYONE is an insider. The question is, are they working towards We The People understanding the fraud of government, or are they working towards strengthening our enslavement in The Matrix.

Determining that for anyone (including Q) is non-trivial and requires honest investigation, taken on by many people, always keeping an open mind, with the sole desire of getting to the Truth, no matter what that Truth may be.

Being in the YGL program absolutely implies being part of the NWO objective. It is absolutely evidence of that, and having "evidence of something" is what "implies" means in the vernacular use of that word. (It means something different in mathematics or formal logic.)

What it is not is "proof." This of course is the misunderstanding of what the word "proof" means.

Just because there is evidence of something, doesn't mean that the conclusions one draws from what the evidence implies are correct.

"Proof" is a decision. It is the decision, different for each individual, that the evidence is sufficient to support the conclusion. That is why in formal investigations we use terms like "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt," or "Preponderance of the evidence," etc..

In the first case, "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a statement that the evidence seen is sufficient, that no doubt based on reason still remains. In the second case, "preponderance of the evidence" means that there may still remain some reasonable doubts, but the evidence is sufficiently convincing that you are leaning towards a specific conclusion.

Thus we have many levels of "proof," all based on how much evidence there is.

Being part of the YGL program is evidence of NWO. I have yet to see a single person involved with the WEF in any way, that upon further investigation, doesn't have many other ties to NWO activities. That would be corroborating evidence to support the implied NWO-YGL connection.

Does Tulsi have such additional evidence? Of course, there is a ton. She is obviously an insider. But so is Trump, Elon, Gen. Flynn, De Santis, blah, blah, blah, everyone. The evidence, once you get past the cognitive dissonance and actually look, suggests that EVERYONE who is ANYONE is an insider. The question is, are they working towards We The People understanding the fraud of government, or are they working towards strengthening our enslavement in The Matrix.

Determining that for anyone (including Q) is non-trivial and requires honest investigation, taken on by many people, always keeping an open mind, with the sole desire of getting to the Truth, no matter what that Truth may be.

Being in the YGL program absolutely implies being part of the NWO objective. It is absolutely evidence of that, and having "evidence of something" is what "implies" means in the vernacular use of that word. (It means something different in mathematics or formal logic.)

What it is not is "proof." This of course is the misunderstanding of what the word "proof" means.

Just because there is evidence of something, doesn't mean that the conclusions one draws from what the evidence implies are correct.

"Proof" is a decision. It is the decision, different for each individual, that the evidence is sufficient to support the conclusion. That is why in formal investigations we use terms like "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt," or "Preponderance of the evidence," etc.. In the first case, "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a statement that the evidence seen is sufficient, that no doubt based on reason still remains. In the second case, "preponderance of the evidence" means that there may still remain some reasonable doubts, but the evidence is sufficiently convincing that you are leaning towards a specific conclusion.

Thus we have many levels of "proof," all based on how much evidence there is.

Being part of the YGL program is evidence of NWO. I have yet to see a single person involved with the WEF in any way, that upon further investigation, doesn't have many other ties to NWO activities. That would be corroborating evidence to support the implied NWO-YGL connection.

Does Tulsi have such additional evidence? Of course, there is a ton. She is obviously an insider. But so is Trump, Elon, Gen. Flynn, De Santis, blah, blah, blah, everyone. The evidence, once you get past the cognitive dissonance and actually look, suggests that EVERYONE who is ANYONE is an insider. The question is, are they working towards We The People understanding the fraud of government, or are they working towards strengthening our enslavement in The Matrix.

Determining that for anyone (including Q) is non-trivial and requires honest investigation, taken on by many people, always keeping an open mind, with the sole desire of getting to the Truth, no matter what that Truth may be.