Is anybody else wondering if this naming names in the casual “special friends/I feel bad for/I really care about” comments is comms? Maybe she’s beginning to confirm individuals in the client list by talking about them in interviews - starting with those who were most intimately involved? Or those she has real dirt on? I just find it odd that she’s taking time to talk about how victimized these men were by their association with Epstein. You’d think if she had anything to say, it would be in her own defence. I just think it’s weird she’s talking about other people - especially when she hasn’t yet revealed ANY of his accomplices and she always said she would if they didn’t help her get acquitted AND she has til June 2023 to work with investigators in exchange for a reduced sentence? I don’t think this is just casual talk. I think she’s literally confirming - naming names, but making it seem like she’s defending them and maintaining their innocence (they are “victims”) so she’s protected.

Is anybody else wondering if this naming names in the casual “special friends/I feel bad for/I really care about” comments is comms? Maybe she’s beginning to confirm individuals in the client list by talking about them in interviews - starting with those who were most intimately involved? Or those she has real dirt on? I just find it odd that she’s taking time to talk about how victimized these men were by their association with Epstein. You’d think if she had anything to say, it would be in her own defence. I just think it’s weird she’s talking about other people - especially when she hasn’t yet revealed ANY of his accomplices and she always said she would if they didn’t help her get acquitted AND she has til June 2023 to work with investigators in exchange for a reduced sentence. I don’t think this is just casual talk. I think she’s literally confirming - naming names, but making it seem otherwise so she can stay alive.