My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
You have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection. Making such a demand would be a felony for you to do so. Congress has passed no legislation giving you authority to do so. Even if Congress did, their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statute would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning). Furthermore, any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
The reason it is fraud is that there is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility. Since this is the basis for your demand, your demand is based on fraud.
There is no scientific evidence that this drug is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework. That would make you negligent in your duty.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
Even a director for Pfizer has recently stated before a European commission that Pfizer did not test for transmissiblity of their so-called "Covid vaccine." The head of the FDA's Vaccine Safety Board said there is "no data" on the effectiveness against transmission of these drugs. NO DATA.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
Check this out from Reuters, trying to spin the Pfizer director's statement:
... Pfizer executive, who is said to “admit” that the company and its partner BioNTech did not test whether their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine reduced virus transmission prior to rolling it out – which is something the companies were not required to do for initial regulatory approval, nor did they claim to have done.
They did not have to show that the vaccine would also prevent people from spreading the virus to others.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-idUSL1N31F20E
Thanks, Reuters!
THAT is the ENTIRE basis for MANDATORY vaccines! "To protect others."
(BTW, the other claims in that article about safe, effective, other researchers, etc. are all FALSE.)
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
You have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection. Making such a demand would be a felony for you to do so. Congress has passed no legislation giving you authority to do so. Even if Congress did, their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statute would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning). Furthermore, any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
The reason it is fraud is that there is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility. Since this is the basis for your demand, your demand is based on fraud.
There is no scientific evidence that this drug is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework. That would make you negligent in your duty.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
Even a director for Pfizer has recently stated before a European commission that Pfizer did not test for transmissiblity of their so-called "Covid vaccine." The head of the FDA's Vaccine Safety Board said there is "no data" on the effectiveness against transmission of these drugs. NO DATA.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
Check this out from Reuters, trying to spin the Pfizer director's statement:
... Pfizer executive, who is said to “admit” that the company and its partner BioNTech did not test whether their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine reduced virus transmission prior to rolling it out – which is something the companies were not required to do for initial regulatory approval, nor did they claim to have done.
They did not have to show that the vaccine would also prevent people from spreading the virus to others.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-idUSL1N31F20E
Thanks, Reuters!
(BTW, the other claims in that article about safe, effective, other researchers, etc. are all FALSE.)
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
You have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection. Making such a demand would be a felony for you to do so. Congress has passed no legislation giving you authority to do so. Even if Congress did, their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statute would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning). Furthermore, any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
The reason it is fraud is that there is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility. Since this is the basis for your demand, your demand is based on fraud.
There is no scientific evidence that this drug is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework. That would make you negligent in your duty.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
You have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection. Making such a demand would be a felony for you to do so. Congress has passed no legislation giving you authority to do so. Even if Congress did, their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statute would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning). Furthermore, any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
The reason it is fraud is that there is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility. Since this is the basis for your demand, your demand is based on fraud.
There is no scientific evidence that this drug is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
You have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection. Making such a demand would be a felony for you to do so. Congress has passed no legislation giving you authority to do so. Even if Congress did, their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statute would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning). Furthermore, any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
There is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility, which is the basis for your coercive demand. There is no scientific evidence that it is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
Not only do you have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection, and not only would it be a felony for you to engage in such an act, and not only has Congress passed no legislation giving you authority to do so, and even if they did their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statute would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning), but any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
There is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility, which is the basis for your coercive demand. There is no scientific evidence that it is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context. You are bound by the Constitution: both your department and you, personally.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
Not only do you have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection, and not only would it be a felony for you to engage in such an act, and not only has Congress passed no legislation giving you authority to do so, and even if they did their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statue would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning), but any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
There is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility, which is the basis for your coercive demand. There is no scientific evidence that it is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot
My response might include something along these lines (it's a tough response, though):
Dear General X:
You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not a pharmaceutical company nor an unlawful order passed down to you.
I, having also sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am prohibited from following any unlawful order, which is what you are attempting to force me to do.
The Constitution for the United States of America states:
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land. -- Article 6, US Constitution
“Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” -- First Amendment, US Constitution
The Supreme Court of the United States decided the law on this matter:
“... a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803)
Your department is an "other department” in this context.
I am not aware of any law passed by Congress granting the United States military to take the action against me that you purport to take. Therefore, if you were to take this action against me, in violation of my freedom of religion, you would be engaging in a criminal act, and issuing an unlawful order.
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
If you issue an unlawful order and demand that I follow it, you are committing coercion, and may be in violation of the federal statutes of Conspiracy Against Rights (18 USC 241) and/or Deprivation of Rights (18 USC 242).
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 241
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;” -- 18 USC 242
Not only do you have no legal authority to demand that I be subjected to a harmful injection, and not only would it be a felony for you to engage in such an act, and not only has Congress passed no legislation giving you authority to do so, and even if they did their own legislation would violate the Constitution and their statue would be null and void ad initio (from the beginning), but any authority you claim to have is based on fraud.
Fraud is also a criminal act.
There is no scientific basis for you to demand that I take an injection of an “emergency use” drug that has not been tested to prove effectiveness, safety, or transmissibility, which is the basis for your coercive demand. There is no scientific evidence that it is helpful to anyone. However, there is ample anecdotal evidence that it is seriously harmful to many.
The ingredients of this drug have not been disclosed to me, and all of the known harmful side effects have not been disclosed to me. The drug that was erroneously approved by the FDA is not the drug you are demanding that I take, because that drug is not available on the market. You are demanding that I take an experimental drug, and coercing me into becoming a guinea pig in an experimental drug trial.
If you, personally, do not know these to be facts, then you have not done your homework.
Because I have not been fully informed, I cannot give my informed consent. Coercing me to give my uninformed consent would be a further violation by you, in this case of the Neuremburg Code.
While I have not been informed of all the harmful effects, I am aware of serious problems with the so-called “Covid vaccine” drugs, to wit:
[List of harm]
You have not given me full disclosure. You do not have any legal authority to demand that I be injected with this unknown, experimental drug. Any claim you have as to effectiveness is based on fraud, and is null and void, because there are no valid scientific studies to validate the claims.
I have already told you, and I will re-state it here, that my religious beliefs do not allow me to take this unknown mystery drug, and I refuse to do so on religious grounds.
I hereby demand that you cease and desist from coercing me into any action that is against my will.
Signed,
Major Patriot