Exactly. Brand monopolization. Competitors were unwelcome. The church of racketeering. The same racketeers that racketeer everything under the sun today too.
The concept of a purposefully vague understanding of blasphemy as an unforgivable sin in a world where a church authority would be the only credentialed judge of what is or is not blasphemy due to how vaguely it is understandable... it is a barely disguised licence to kill opposing voices. What other groups of people do we know of today are master practitioners of censorship and racketeering? And wearing a false flag for that matter. Same playbook, same adversary.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
The Q Source, though not formatted into nearly as neat and coherent a narrative as the Bible we have instead, paints a picture of a much more disruptive God fearing, world rejecting people. It is a people that is utterly contemptible and contemptuous of worldly authority.
Sorry about the link, it looks like shit coming from a Google search link.
Exactly. Brand monopolization. Competitors were unwelcome. The church of racketeering. The same racketeers that racketeer everything under the sun today too.
The concept of a purposefully vague understanding of blasphemy as an unforgivable sin in a world where a church authority would be the only credentialed judge of what is or is not blasphemy due to how vaguely it is understandable... it is a barely disguised licence to kill opposing voices. What other groups of people do we know of today are master practitioners of censorship and racketeering? Same playbook, same adversary.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
The Q Source, though not formatted into nearly as neat and coherent a narrative as the Bible we have instead, paints a picture of a much more disruptive God fearing, world rejecting people. It is a people that is utterly contemptible and contemptuous of worldly authority.
Sorry about the link, it looks like shit coming from a Google search link.
Exactly. Brand monopolization. Competitors were unwelcome. The church of racketeering. The same racketeers that racketeer everything under the sun today too.
The concept of a purposefully vague understanding of blasphemy as an unforgivable sin in a world where a church authority would be the only credentialed judge of what is or is not blasphemy due to how vaguely it is understandable... it is a barely disguised licence to kill opposing voices. What other groups of people do we know of today are master practitioners of censorship and racketeering? Same playbook, same adversary.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
The Q Source, though not formatted into nearly as neat and coherent a narrative as the Bible we have instead, paints a picture of a much more disruptive God fearing, world rejecting people. It is a people that is utterly contemptible and contemptuous of worldly authority.
Sorry about the link, it looks like shit coming from a Google search.
Exactly. Brand monopolization. Competitors were unwelcome. The church of racketeering. The same racketeers that racketeer everything under the sun today too.
The concept of a purposefully vague understanding of blasphemy as an unforgivable sin in a world where a church authority would be the only credentialed judge of what is or is not blasphemy due to how vaguely it is understandable... it is a barely disguised licence to kill opposing voices. What other groups of people do we know of today are master practitioners of censorship and racketeering? Same playbook, same adversary.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
The Q Source, though not formatted into nearly as neat and coherent a narrative as the Bible we have instead, paints a picture of a much more disruptive God fearing, world rejecting people. It is a people that is utterly contemptible and contemptuous of worldly authority.
Exactly. Brand monopolization. Competitors were unwelcome. The church of racketeering. The same racketeers that racketeer everything under the sun today too.
The concept of a purposefully vague understanding of blasphemy as an unforgivable sin in a world where a church authority would be the only credentialed judge of what is or is not blasphemy due to how vaguely it is understandable... it is a barely disguised licence to kill opposing voices. What other groups of people do we know of today are master practitioners of censorship and racketeering? Same playbook, same adversary.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
The Q Source, though not formatted into nearly as neat and coherent a narrative as the Bible we have instead, paints a picture of a much more disruptive God fearing, world rejecting people. It is a people that is utterly contemptible and contemptuous of worldly authority.
PDF OF Q Source: ndeinfo.wmthost.com https://ndeinfo.wmthost.com › ...PDF The Lost Gospel of Q.pdf
Exactly. Brand monopolization. Competitors were unwelcome. The church of racketeering. The same racketeers that racketeer everything under the sun today too.
The concept of a purposefully vague understanding of blasphemy as an unforgivable sin in a world where a church authority would be the only credentialed judge of what is or is not blasphemy due to how vaguely it is understandable... it is a barely disguised licence to kill opposing voices. What other groups of people do we know of today are master practitioners of censorship and racketeering? Same playbook, same adversary.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
The Q Source, though not formatted into nearly as neat and coherent a narrative as the Bible we have instead, paints a picture of a much more disruptive God fearing, world rejecting people. It is a people that is utterly contemptible and contemptuous of worldly authority.