I would propose a decentralized registry on a blockchain. It's the most secure way to track information we have to date and land usage registry could be readily done on the blockchain with nfts and smart contract.
No easily corrupted humans need be involved.
The system could be fully and completely automated with open source, publicly audited code.
I'm confused as to why you would think a minimum land allotment is welfare/communism. You don't get taken care of in what I'm suggesting.
If you don't build your house, you freeze, if you don't farm you starve, if you don't have other skills to trade in return for food, you starve.
Furthermore, if you don't build the house, you forfeit your land usage registry.
There is no communism or welfare in that, it's actually pretty harsh it just doesn't require that you have money to "purchase" land from some organisation that has an army and will kill you.
I'm not suggesting welfare at all:
Merely the integration of the inalienable humans rights to adequate food, shelter and water.
That doesn't mean I think people need to give it to you. That means that the robber barrens need to get the fuck out of the way and let people live as the free citizens they are.
Land ownership creates land barren, land barrens create gangs (standing armies) and extort the people on "their" land. Land barrens rules for a few generations, then they call themselves kings and queens.
No one else has the ability to aquire real wealth because the barren just sets the rent high enough that no one can compete with him financially.
If someone moves out of the barrens jurisdiction, the barrens jurisdiction magically expands to recapture the dissident unless another robber barren psychopath narcissist thinks it's his jurisdiction, the it's war
Eventually the robber barrens control the majority of wealth and are spreading propaganda about how God has chosen them to lead all the other people because they are special.
Land ownership and territorial demarcation are 100% natural, that doesn't make it right, that doesn't make it moral.
We only think it's normal to own land because of 1000s of years of robber barrens, many native American tribes didn't even understand what they were signing because land ownership was a completely foreign concept to them.
They had territorial disputes, but that was over food and resources, they considered the actual physical land to be owner less and the concept of owning it to be insane because the land belong to the creator.
Let that sink in, the land belong to the creator.
What did the creator tell you?
That the land, animals, plants and rocks are all for your use as a human.
No one in history ever had the ability to buy land from God.
The land belongs to him. Even the promised land wasnt given to the Jews, it was just set aside for their exclusive use, God still very much claims ownership over that land.
Any one claiming they own land is claiming they own gods property, you wanna explain to the big guy why you murdered people who are using land he explicitly gave permission to all humans to use?
I would propose a decentralized registry on a blockchain. It's the most secure way to track information we have to date and land usage registry could be readily done on the blockchain with nfts and smart contract.
No easily corrupted humans need be involved.
The system could be fully and completely automated with open source, publicly audited code.
I'm confused as to why you would think a minimum land allotment is welfare/communism. You don't get taken care of in what I'm suggesting.
If you don't build your house, you freeze, if you don't farm you starve, if you don't have other skills to trade in return for food, you starve.
Furthermore, if you don't build the house, you forfeit your land usage registry.
There is no communism or welfare in that, it's actually pretty harsh it just doesn't require that you have money to "purchase" land from some organisation that has an army and will kill you.
I'm not suggesting welfare at all:
Merely the integration of the inalienable humans rights to adequate food, shelter and water.
That doesn't mean I think people need to give it to you. That means that the robber barrens need to get the fuck out of the way and let people live as the free citizens they are.
Land ownership creates land barren, land barrens create gangs (standing armies) and extort the people on "their" land. Land barrens rules for a few generations, then they call themselves kings and queens.
No one else has the ability to aquire real wealth because the barren just sets the rent high enough that no one can compete with him financially.
If someone moves out of the barrens jurisdiction, the barrens jurisdiction magically expands to recapture the dissident unless another robber barren psychopath narcissist thinks it's his jurisdiction, the it's war
Eventually the robber barrens control the majority of wealth and are spreading propaganda about how God has chosen them to lead all the other people because they are special.
Land ownership and territorial demarcation are 100% natural, that doesn't make it right, that doesn't make it moral.
We only think it's normal to own land because of 1000s of years of robber barrens, many native American tribes didn't even understand what they were signing because land ownership was a completely foreign concept to them.
They had territorial disputes, but that was over food and resources, they considered the actual physical land to be owner less and the concept of owning it to be insane because the land belong to the creator.
Let that sink in, the land belong to the creator.
What did the creator tell you?
That the land, animals, plants and rocks are all for your use as a human.
No one in history ever had the ability to buy land from God.
The land belongs to him. Even the promised land want given to the Jews, it was just set aside for their exclusive use, God still very much claims ownership over that land.
Any one claiming they own land is claiming they own gods property, you wanna explain to the big guy why you murdered people who are using land he explicitly gave permission to all humans to use?
I would propose a decentralized registry on a blockchain. It's the most secure way to track information we have to date and land usage registry could be readily done on the blockchain with nfts and smart contract.
No easily corrupted humans need be involved.
The system could be fully and completely automated with open source, publicly audited code.
I'm confused as to why you would think a minimum land allotment is welfare/communism. You don't get taken care of in what I'm suggesting.
If you don't build your house, you freeze, if you don't farm you starve, if you don't have other skills to trade in return for food, you starve.
Furthermore, if you don't build the house, you forfeit your land usage registry.
There is no communism or welfare in that, it's actually pretty harsh it just doesn't require that you have money to "purchase" land from some organisation that has an army and will kill you.
I'm not suggesting welfare at all:
Merely the integration of the inalienable humans rights to adequate food, shelter and water.
That doesn't mean I think people need to give it to you. That means that the robber barrens need to get the fuck out of the way and let people live as the free citizens they are.
Land ownership creates land barren, land barrens create gangs (standing armies) and extort the people on "their" land. Land barrens rules for a few generations, then they call themselves kings and queens.
No one else has the ability to aquire real wealth because the barren just sets the rent high enough that no one can compete with him financially.
If someone moves out of the barrens jurisdiction, the barrens jurisdiction magically expands to recapture the dissident unless another robber barren psychopath narcissist thinks it's his jurisdiction, the it's war
Eventually the robber barrens control the majority of wealth and are spreading propaganda about how God has chosen them to lead all the other people because they are special.
Land ownership and territorial demarcation are 100% natural, that doesn't make it right, that doesn't make it moral.
We only think it's normal to own land because of 1000s of years of robber barrens, many native American tribes didn't even understand what they were signing because land ownership was a completely foreign concept to them.
They had territorial disputes, but that was over food and resources, they considered the actual physical land to be owner less and the concept of owning it to be insane because the land belong to the creator.
Let that sink in, the land belong to the creator.
What did the creator tell you?
That the land, animals, plants and rocks are all for your use as a human.
No one in history ever had the ability to buy land from God.
The land belongs to him.
Any one claiming they own land it's claiming they own gods property.
I would propose a decentralized registry on a blockchain. It's the most secure way to track information we have to date and land usage registry could be readily done on the blockchain with nfts and smart contract.
No easily corrupted humans need be involved.
The system could be fully and completely automated with open source, publicly audited code.
I'm confused as to why you would think a minimum land allotment is welfare/communism. You don't get taken care of in what I'm suggesting.
If you don't build your house, you freeze, if you don't farm you starve, if you don't have other skills to trade in return for food, you starve.
Furthermore, if you don't build the house, you forfeit your land usage registry.
There is no communism or welfare in that, it's actually pretty harsh it just doesn't require that you have money to "purchase" land from some organisation that has an army and will kill you.
I'm not suggesting welfare at all:
Merely the integration of the inalienable humans rights to adequate food, shelter and water.
That doesn't mean I think people need to give it to you. That means that the robber barrens need to get the fuck out of the way and let people live as the free citizens they are.
Land ownership creates land barren, land barrens create gangs (standing armies) and extort the people on "their" land. Land barrens rules for a few generations, then they call themselves kings and queens.
No one else has the ability to aquire real wealth because the barren just sets the rent high enough that no one can compete with him financially.
If someone moves out of the barrens jurisdiction, the barrens jurisdiction magically expands to recapture the dissident unless another robber barren psychopath narcissist thinks it's his jurisdiction, the it's war
Eventually the robber barrens control the majority of wealth and are spreading propaganda about how God has chosen them to lead all the other people because they are special.
Land ownership and territorial demarcation are 100% natural, that doesn't make it right, that doesn't make it moral.
We only think it's normal to own land because of 1000s of years of robber barrens, many native American tribes didn't even understand what they were signing because land ownership was a completely foreign concept to them.
They had territorial disputes, but that was over food and resources, they considered the actual physical land to be owner less and the concept of owning it to be insane.
I would propose a decentralized registry on a blockchain. It's the most secure way to track information we have to date and land usage registry could be readily done on the blockchain with nfts and smart contract.
No easily corrupted humans need be involved.
The system could be fully and completely automated with open source, publicly audited code.
I'm confused as to why you would think a minimum land allotment is welfare/communism. You don't get taken care of in what I'm suggesting.
If you don't build your house, you freeze, if you don't farm you starve, if you don't have other skills to trade in return for food, you starve.
Furthermore, if you don't build the house, you forfeit your land usage registry.
There is no communism or welfare in that, it's actually pretty harsh it just doesn't require that you have money to "purchase" land from some organisation that has an army and will kill you.
I'm not suggesting welfare at all:
Merely the integration of the inalienable humans rights to adequate food, shelter and water.
That doesn't mean I think people need to give it to you. That means that the robber barrens need to get the fuck out of the way and let people live as the free citizens they are.
Land ownership creates land barren, land barrens create gangs (standing armies) and extort the people on "their" land. Land barrens rules for a generation few generations, then they call themselves kings and queens.
No one else has the ability to sweetie real wealth because the barren just sets the rent high enough that no one can compete with him financially.
Eventually the robber barrens control the majority of wealth and are spreading propaganda about how God has chosen them to lead all the other people because they are special.